Cases

OPINION Justice BAER. Appellants seek a new trial in this medical battery/lack-of-consent ease on the ground that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the technical elements of battery, particularly the intent to cause a harmful or offensive contact. They further maintain that the charge was erroneous because it instructed the jury that Appellants/Plaintiffs were required to prove

06/03/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 22, 2025 Session AMANDA COOPER HEARN, AS TRUSTEE OF THE COOPER FAMILY TRUST v. SHARON THOMAS F/K/A SHARON W. COOPER AS TRUSTEE OF THE COOPER FAMILY TRUST Appeal from the Chancery Court for Chester County No. 2021-C

OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee Sharon K. Cooper appeals the decision of Greene County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, adopting in part and modifying in part a decision of the magistrate regarding the division of defendant-appellee/cross-appellant *Page 2 Danny L. Cooper's retirement benefits, as well as certain financial accounts specified in the

617 F.3d 307 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis Efrain COOPER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-7131. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: January 26, 2010. Decided: August 16, 2010. *308 ARGUED: Brendan S. Leary, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Wheeling,

Appellant Sharon Lee (Moore) Cooper appeals from the trial court's order denying issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the District Clerk of Randall County to issue a judicial wage withholding order to the employer of appellee Sammy Wayne Moore.1 By three issues, she contends the trial court erred by 1) failing to file findings of fact and conclusions of law, 2) failing to issue a writ of mandamus to the District Clerk of Randall C

OPINION SHARON G. LEE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ„ joined. A jury convicted the defendant of premeditated first degree murder for shoot-

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED Richard Gravely, November 17, 2017 Plaintiff Below, Petitioner EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEA

kCANNELLA, Judge. Defendant, Sharon Jordan Cooper, appeals from the district court judgment in favor of her former husband, Rickey Laverne Cooper, ordering the Clerk of Court for the Parish of Jefferson to cancel the mortgage inscription on property which the parties formerly owned together. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. Sharon Cooper and Rickey Cooper were granted a divorce on July 8,1981.

RENDERED: MARCH 22, 2018 TO BE PUBLISHED ~upmut ~fourf nf ~t~~~ l 2016-SC-000677-DG [5) ffi\lJ. ~'f/rl/lt Kr&. Ouf,...,,,, be.. HARRY L. SEEGER APPELLANT ON· REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. CASE NOS. 2013-CA-001591-DG

KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on four pending motions to dismiss: (1) Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC's ("MBUSA['s]" and, collectively with Defendant Daimler AG,1 "Mercedes Benz['s]") FRCP 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss (DE 78; Response DE 97; Reply DE 104); (2) Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc.'s ("Honda['s]" and, co

536 Pa. 134 (1994) 638 A.2d 208 Harvey M. OAKS and Eleanor Cooper, Administrators of the Estate of James L. Cooper, Deceased, Appellants, v. Donna Jean COOPER, Appellee. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 20, 1993. Decided March 11, 1994. *135 *136 Murray S

OPINION FUTEY,Judge. This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). In his complaint, plaintiff seeks reimbursement of funds paid to Portuguese authorities allegedly as a result of negligence on the part of defendant. Defendant argues that plaintiffs cause of action sounds in tort and is, therefore, beyond

PER CURIAM: A jury convicted appellant of willfully failing to appear before the Superior Court in violation of D.C.Code § 23-1327(a) (1995 Supp.) (Bail Reform Act). Appellant argues on appeal that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction; (2) the court erred in ruling that appellant’s drug use was an improper argument in support of her defense; (3) the prosecutor improperly impeached appellant with eviden

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-06-169-CV JEFFREY D. WESTBROOK APPELLANT V. DANNY R. H

NO. 12-19-00001-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS HUTCH AVIATION, INC., § APPEAL FROM THE 159TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT SHARON L. TEAL AND MIKE TEMPLETON, § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEES

427 Pa. Superior Ct. 430 (1993) 629 A.2d 944 Eleanor COOPER, Appellee, v. Harvey OAKES as Administrator of the Estate of James L. Cooper, Appellees. Appeal of Christine RICHMOND, Karen Douthett and Sharon Braden, Appellants. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued February 9, 1993. Filed June 21, 1993. Reargument Denied August 30, 199

Karen King Mitchell, Judge National General Insurance Online, Inc. (Insurer), appeals from the denial of its motion to intervene as a matter of right in an underlying personal injury lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Wunderlich (Husband) *435 against Sharon Wunderlich (Wife). Insurer argues that the trial co

By the Court, STIGLICH, J.: The use of a peremptory challenge to remove a potential juror on the basis of race is a violation of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court of the United States has outlined a three-part test to help courts determine whether a peremptory challenge is improperly based on race, see *204Batson v.

13 P.3d 68 (2000) 129 N.M. 710 2000-NMCA-100 Jimmie T. COOPER, Individually and as Trustee for the Jimmie T. Cooper and Betty P. Cooper Revocable Trust and Betty P. Cooper, Individually and as Trustee for the Jimmie T. Cooper and Betty P. Cooper Revocable Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION; Chevron U.S.A., Inc.; Dynegy Corporation f/k/a NGC Corporation, f/k/a Warren Petroleum