Cases

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS LARRY L. HARRIS, Appellant, v. SHARON HARRIS, Appellee. <

Opinion issued January 30, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00822-CV —————————— SHARON YASIN, Appellant V. HARRIS COUNTY CIVIL COURTS AT LARGE

*152 CARLTON, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Sharon Harris appeals the Jones County Chancery Court’s order denying her request for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a preliminary injunction and dismissing her complaint against the National Oak Park High School Alumni Association (NOPHS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 20-0819 IN RE STEVEN HOTZE, M.D., HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY, HON. KEITH NIELSEN, AND SHARON HEMPHILL, RELATORS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS JUSTICE DEVINE dissenting from the Court’s order denying the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay. “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial depar

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 26, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00219-CV SHARON YASIN, Appellant V. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS; ARTURO JACKSON; MICHAEL ANDRADE; JEREMY SCHOECH; MICHAEL HONER; AND RHONDA RUSSELL, Appellees On Appeal from the County Civil C

Opinion issued July 12, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00507-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT 368, ROY LACKEY, TIFFANY BISHOP, SHARON COOK, ALLISON DUNN, AND ERIC DANIEL, Appellant

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER OF ABATEMENT Appellate case name: Harris County Municipal Utility District 368, Roy Lackey, Tiffany Bishop, Sharon Cook, Allison Dunn and Eric Daniel v. Klein Independent School District Appellate case number: 01-21-00507-CV Trial court case number: 2021-08284 T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 20-0751 IN RE STEVEN HOTZE, M.D., HARRIS COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY, HON. KEITH NIELSEN, WENDELL CHAMPION, SHARON HEMPHILL, AND AL HARTMAN, RELATORS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS JUSTICE DEVINE dissenting from the Court’s order denying the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay.

Per Curiam. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (M. Walsh, J.), entered August 13, 2012, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody and visitation. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of two sons (born in 1996 and 1999). In July 2010, Family Court en

Per Curiam. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (M. Walsh, J.), entered August 13, 2012, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody and visitation. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of two sons (born in 1996 and 1999). In July 2010, Family Court en

CRAHAN, Judge. Appellant Pauwell’s Transformers, Inc. appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s final award affirming an award of permanent total disability in favor of respondent Sharon Harris. Because the notice of appeal fails to comply with the requirements of section 287.495 RSMo 2000, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.1 The essential facts are

JUDGMENT, MEMORANDUM, AND ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: I. Introduction... 94 II. Facts... 95 A. Initial Proceedings... 95 B. Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment.. .96 III. Law... 97

Ray Thornton, Justice. The issue in this case is whether the statute of limitations bars the action for child-support arrearages brought by appellant Sharon Harris Cole on behalf of her child, Brian Lynn Harris. Brian was born on July 11, 1972. On July 9, 1974, the chancery court granted appellant a divorce from appellee Olen Dale Harris and awarded her weekly child support of $15.00.

852 N.E.2d 474 (2006) In re SHARENA H., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Sharon H., Respondent-Appellant). No. 1-05-4012. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. June 30, 2006. *476 Cook County Public Defender, Chicago (Andrea Monsees, of counsel), Office of the Cook Count

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-Appellant Audra Lynn Harris is a former inmate of Bedford Hills Correctional Facility. She testified at her deposition that, while incarcerated at Bed-ford Hills, a male officer and three female officers entered her room to take down cotton that she had removed from her mattress and pasted to her room’s windows. The male officer then demanded to know if Harris had any more cotton. According to Harris’s test

ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIY. P. 12(b)(1) (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) (3) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE NEW ARGUMENTS AND EVIDENCE IN DEFENDANT’S REPLY BRIEF [ECF Nos. 49, 50.]

907 N.E.2d 939 (2009) The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 5-07-0205. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. May 11, 2009. *940 E. Joyce Randolph, Deputy Defender, Paige Clark Strawn, Assistant Defender, Office of the State Appellate Defender, Fifth Judicial Dis

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO DISMISS LEWIS M. KILLIAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court on the LPS Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiffs notice of voluntary dismissal and alternative motion for leave to dismiss voluntarily pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). After due consideration of the record and plea

OPINION KM-Timbercreek, LLC ("Timber-creek"), appeals from the trial court's order granting Harris County Appraisal District's ("HCAD") plea to the jurisdiction and denying a Rule 28 motion filed by the initial plaintiff, KMI Yorktown, LP ("Yorktown"), to substitute the "true name" of Timbercreek for that of Yorktown as plaintiff. After pursuing an administrative protest of HCAD's 2007 valuation of the property, Yorktown sued to challenge the Appraisa

This is an appeal from a judgment allowing a credit against a child-support arrearage for direct payments made to adult children. Facts and Procedural History Christy Harris ("the mother") and William Scott Weaver ("the father") divorced in 1995; they had three children. As part of the settlement agreement incorporated into the divorce judgment, the father was ordered to pay $850 per month in child support. The agreement stated, in pertinent part: