Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sharon Durham”
Cnty. of Durham v. Burnettepublic domain
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of January 2019 by Defendant to Strike Appellant's Second Argument:*405"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
Cnty. of Durham v. Burnettepublic domain
*399The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of February 2019 by Plaintiff to Amend Table of Cases and Authorities:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
STROUD, Judge. *17Trial courts have a responsibility to enforce the law and to order relief or punishment for willful disobedience of its orders. But courts are not just collection agencies. Trial courts also have a responsibility to consider the basic subsistence needs of an alleged contemnor before determining he has the ability to pay child sup
Cnty. of Durham v. Burnettepublic domain
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of February 2019 by Plaintiff for Permission to Provide Supplemental Authority:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of March 2019."
County of Durham by and Through Durham DSS v. Hodgespublic domain
STROUD, Judge. *288 Defendant Omega Hodges ("defendant") appeals from the trial court's civil contempt commitment order entered 14 June 2016 and petitions for certiorari as to the trial court's order entered 17 June 2016. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by finding that
Cnty. of Durham v. Burnettepublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Justice DAVIS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Glover, Sharon v. Vanderbilt Medical Centerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT COOKEVILLE BY INTERCHANGE Sharon Glover, ) Docket No.: 2015-06-0165 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 92319-2014 ) Vanderbilt Medical Center ) Judge Rob
329 B.R. 899 (2005) In the Matter of Sharon L. DURHAM, Debtor. Americredit Financial Services, Movant, v. Sharon Durham, Debtor, and Camille Hope, Trustee, Respondents. No. 02-54569 RFH. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. January 21, 2005. *900 Robert M. Matson, Macon, GA, for Debtor. Philip
ACCEPTED 12-15-00169CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/31/2015 4:17:18 PM
NO. 12-15-00169-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS EARL ANDERSON, CARRIE BELL § APPEAL FROM THE 173RD SCOTT, SHARON ANDERSON, EVANCE ANDERSON, BILL BURTON, WILLIE MAE ANDERSON, AND JERRY J. ANDERSON (SMITH), APPELLANTS § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT V. ROBERT LOUIS DURHAM, APPE
ACCEPTED 12-15-00169-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/20/2015 8:06:36 PM
ACCEPTED 12-15-00169CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 12-15-00169CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/10/2015 10:47:35 PM
ACCEPTED 12-15-00169CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/30/2015 3:26:39 PM
ACCEPTED 12-15-00169CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/31/2015 4:17:18 PM
ACCEPTED 12-15-00169CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Durhampublic domain
In re Durham, Judy; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 182,274; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 31044-KW. Denied, KNOLL, J., would grant the writ. KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 2nd of August 2017 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of November 2017."
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 3rd of July 2017 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."
Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed by Defendants on the 17th of July 2017 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."