⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Sharon Davis Coats”

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019-03-11 · Published · cited 4× · 597 B.R. 770
Robert N. Opel, II, Chief Bankruptcy Judge The pro se Chapter 13 Debtor filed a Complaint which challenges a pre-petition state court judgment in mortgage foreclosure by the Defendant/Bank. I will grant the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, with prejudice. I. Jurisdiction This Court has apparent jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019-07-12 · Published · cited 0× · 829 S.E.2d 221
Davis, J. recused
Davis v. Garciapublic domain
District Court, D. Utah · 2013-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 953 F. Supp. 2d 1205; 2013 WL 3087561; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86238
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 169) filed by the *1207only remaining Defendants in this case, Wendy Garcia, Lori Holmes, Veronica Kasprzak, Amy Reed, and Charlene Sans
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 90 F. Supp. 3d 515; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24016; 2015 WL 847407
ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). (DE 55). Also pending before the court is plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaims for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, under Rule 12(b)(6). (DE 50). For the reasons stated below, defenda
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 238 F. Supp. 3d 751; 122 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1040; 2017 WL 782291; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27711
ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss, pursuant to Fed*753eral Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (DE 92, 101). The issues presented are ripe for ruling. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted. BACKGROUND On Octob
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-04-22 · Published · cited 3× · 822 F.3d 1302; 2016 WL 1613280
TARANTO, Circuit Judge. Robert Mankes owns U.S. Patent No. 6,477,503, which describes and claims methods for managing a reservation system that divides inventory between a local server and a remote Internet server. In October 2013, Mr. Mankes sued Vivid Seats Ltd. and Fandango, LLC in the Eastern District of North Carolina, alleging that their operation of Internet-based reserva
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2018-12-03 · Published · cited 5× · 240 Cal. Rptr. 3d 675; 29 Cal. App. 5th 890
ZELON, J. *894Katherine Rosen, a student at the University of California at Los Angeles, was severely injured after being attacked by another student who had been receiving treatment for mental illness. Rosen filed a negligence action alleging that university personnel failed to take reasonable measures to protect her from the perpetrator's f
Vinton v. Virzipublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012-02-13 · Published · cited 35× · 269 P.3d 1242; 2012 CO 10; 2012 Colo. LEXIS 92; 2012 WL 439716
269 P.3d 1242 (2012) In re Amanda VINTON, Esq., Petitioner v. Sharon VIRZI, Beneficiary; Walter J. Kirkland & Elaine Kirkland Irrevocable Living Trust; and Debra McWilliams, Trustee of the Walter J. Kirkland & Elaine Kirkland Irrevocable Living Trust, and individually, Respondents. No. 11SA77. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. February 13, 2012.
California Supreme Court · 2018-03-22 · Published · cited 407× · 230 Cal. Rptr. 3d 415; 413 P.3d 656; 4 Cal. 5th 607
CORRIGAN, J. *419 *613 After he enrolled in the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Damon Thompson experienced auditory hallucinations. He believed other students in the classroom a
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008-11-12 · Published · cited 0× · 299 F. App'x 295
PER CURIAM: Debro Siddiq Abdul-Akbar seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Abdul-Akbar see
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014-01-31 · Published · cited 0× · 995 F. Supp. 2d 1253; 2014 WL 411635; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12106
MEMORANDUM OPINION LYNWOOD SMITH, District Judge. On March 11, 2013, the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation was entered, and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. On March 25, 2013, defendants Lori McCullough and Ashley Wilson filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, acc
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011-11-30 · Published · cited 6× · 460 B.R. 341; 2011 WL 6057987
460 B.R. 341 (2011) In re Mark TURNAGE, Debtor. Christine Kasper, Plaintiff, v. Mark Turnage, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 08-86040-CRM. Adversary No. 09-06145-CRM. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. November 30, 2011. *343 Melinda Davis Taylor, Spruell Taylor & Assoc., PC, Marietta, GA, Sharon T
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012-02-08 · Published · cited 6× · 94 So. 3d 1; 2011 La.App. 1 Cir. 0448; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 136; 2012 WL 600846
KUHN, J. 14Plaintiffs-appellants, Leslie Dillon and his major children, April and Matthew, (collectively the Dillons), appeal the trial court’s judgment entered in conformity with a jury verdict awarding $5,225.00 in general and special damages to Leslie Dillon against defendants, Vulcan Materials Company (Vulcan) and Industrial Coating Contractors, Inc. (ICC) for his exposure to a chemical release, which occurred at the Vulca
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2014-11-14 · Published · cited 145× · 452 S.W.3d 779; 2014 Tenn. LEXIS 917
OPINION SHARON G. LEE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, GARY R. WADE, and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ., joined. The issue presented is whether the defendant is entitled to a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. A Shelby County jury co
Proctor v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Alaska · 2010-07-23 · Published · cited 1× · 236 P.3d 375; 2010 Alas. App. LEXIS 84; 2010 WL 2870106
236 P.3d 375 (2010) Bradley PROCTOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee. No. A-10112. Court of Appeals of Alaska. July 23, 2010. Beth G.L. Trimmer, Assistant Public Advocate, and Rachel Levitt, Public Advocate, Anchorage, for the Appellant. Terisia K. Chleborad, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Special Prosecutions and Appeals, Anchorage, and Richar
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2004-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 321 F. Supp. 2d 1118; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11656
DAVIS, District Judge. These matters are before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ motions for relief from parts 1(A) and 1(B) of PTO No. 114, which require that Plaintiffs submit either a case-specific expert report from a medical expert attesting that Baycol caused the plaintiff injury or a letter and supporting documents, followed by a case-specific expert report, that identifies and highlights the medical records, samples
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007-11-02 · Published · cited 1× · 934 A.2d 1046; 177 Md. App. 165; 2007 Md. App. LEXIS 137
934 A.2d 1046 (2007) 177 Md. App. 165 Julian MADISON-SHEPPARD v. STATE of Maryland. No. 598, September Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 2, 2007. *1047 Merrilyn E. Ratliff (Sherrie B. Glasser, Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender, on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellant.
Davidson v. Cooneypublic domain
Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967-01-10 · Published · cited 14× · 147 N.W.2d 819; 259 Iowa 1278; 1967 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 694
147 N.W.2d 819 (1967) Sharon Coates DAVIDSON, Appellee, v. R. J. COONEY, d/b/a R. J. Cooney Construction Company, Appellant. Margery DAVIS, formerly Margery Fry, formerly Margery Carlson, Appellee, v. R. J. COONEY, d/b/a R. J. Cooney Construction Company, Appellant. No. 52014. Supreme Court of Iowa. January 10, 1967. *820
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017-10-20 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Jeremy Lyle Shultz, Petitioner Below, Petitioner FILED October 20, 2017 vs) No. 16-0934 (Kanawha County 13-P-362) RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-10-09 · Published · cited 2× · 985 F. Supp. 2d 13; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145684; 2013 WL 5548808
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Sharon Harrison, an employee of Defendant the Office of the Architect of the Capitol, filed suit alleging the Defendant subjected the Plaintiff to a hostile work environment and retaliated against the Plaintiff for engaging in protected activity, in violation of the Congressi