Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2001-CA-00900-SCT GARY M. DAVIS v. SHARON DAVIS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/30/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN S. GRANT, III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: MICHAEL P. YOUNGER ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: WILLIAM R. WRIGHT

[Cite as Rose of Sharon Fence Supply, Ltd. v. Davis, 2016-Ohio-924.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 102804 ROSE OF SHARON FENCE SUPPLY, LTD. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

17 So.3d 114 (2009) Sharon DAVIS, Appellant, v. Gary DAVIS, M.D., Appellee. No. 2007-CA-01215-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. February 24, 2009. Rehearing Denied June 23, 2009. Certiorari Denied September 17, 2009. *116 William P. Featherston, Ridgeland, attorney for appellant. Felec

PER CURIAM. We affirm the denial of Appellant’s post-conviction motion, entitled “Second Motion to Dismiss.” However, the order denying Appellant’s motion for rehearing . also barred any further pro se pleadings. If a court wishes to impose a bar to future pro se filings by Appellant, it must provide him notice and an opportunity to respond through issuance of a show cause order. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48-49 (F

Robert N. Opel, II, Chief Bankruptcy Judge The pro se Chapter 13 Debtor filed a Complaint which challenges a pre-petition state court judgment in mortgage foreclosure by the Defendant/Bank. I will grant the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, with prejudice. I. Jurisdiction This Court has apparent jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 14, 2003 Session VICKI B. CARLTON v. SHARON L. DAVIS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 01C-3864 Barbara Haynes, Judge No. M2002-01089-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 24, 2003 The trial court granted summary judgment to Appellee based upon expir

224 S.W.3d 165 (2006) Julianne D. DAVIS v. Ricky DAVIS. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section, at Knoxville. September 21, 2006 Session. November 3, 2006. Permission to Appeal Denied March 12, 2007. *166 Ricky Davis, Knoxville, Tennessee, pro se Appellant. Julianne D. Davis, Knoxville, Tennessee,

567 S.E.2d 159 (2002) Sharon DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Torian Lewis McMILLIAN, Defendant. No. COA01-887. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 6, 2002. *160 McGougan Law Firm, by Paul J. Ekster and Willis Harper, Jr., Whiteville, for plaintiff-appellee. William L. Davis, III, Lumberton, for defendant-appellant. WYNN

DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER RE CLAIM 3(A) EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner was convicted and sentenced to death for the robbery, attempted rape, and murder of an 84-year-old woman in January 1985. The California Supreme Court affirmed Petitioner’s conviction and death sentence in 1990. People v. Taylor, 52 Cal.3d

DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER RE GUILT PHASE CLAIMS EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner was convicted and sentenced to death for the robbery, attempted rape, and murder of an 84-year-old woman in January 1985. The California Supreme Court affirmed Petitioner’s conviction and death sentence in 1990. People v. Taylor, 52 Cal.3d

Armstrong, J. ¶1 — Sharon Davis, Batyah Chliek, and James Booth filed a class action lawsuit in Thurston County Superior Court, alleging that the Department of Labor and Industries (Department) impermissibly allocated portions of their third-party settlements to reimburse the workers’ compensation fund. On summary judgment, the superior court declined to address whether it had subject matter jurisdiction over the claims and wheth

PER CURIAM. The parties to this appeal, Mark D. Davis (“the father”), and Tonya D. Black-stock (“the mother”), have been before the appellate courts of this state on several previous occasions. “The father and the mother married on November 11, 2000. Four months later, while they were residing in Tennessee, the father and the mother separated. The mother was pregnant with the [parties’] child at

KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In this custody dispute between the natural father and the maternal grand*35mother, the chancellor granted custody to the father, finding that the father had not deserted his child. Although the grandmother had stood in loco parentis to the child since the mother’s death, the chancellor correctly recognized

718 S.E.2d 559 (2011) 312 Ga. App. 328 DAVIS v. The STATE. No. A11A1269. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 1, 2011. *561 Sharon Lee Hopkins, Augusta, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, Dist. Atty., Alston Christian McNairy, William C. Akins, Atlanta, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. SMITH,

BENJAMIN, Justice: Petitioners, Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC (“Constellium” or “the company”) and Melvin 'Lager (hereinafter “CEO Lager” or “the CEO”) appealed the September 3, 2013, final order of the Circuit Court of Jackson County. In its order, the circuit court denied Constellium’s post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial following a jury trial. ■ The jury awarded respondents Sha

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERS LYNWOOD C. SMITH, JR., District Judge. This action grew out of child custody and support proceedings in the Tennessee and Alabama court systems between Mark Davis, who sues as a pro se plaintiff, and his former wife, Tonya Smith Davis (now known as Blackstock), who is the mother of the child that has become the innocent, collateral casualty of their, seemingly, nev

702 S.E.2d 14 (2010) DAVIS v. The STATE. No. A10A1302. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 23, 2010. *15 Lance D. Dutton, for appellant. T. Joseph Campbell, Dist. Atty., Sharon M. Fox, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. MILLER, Chief Judge. Following a stipulated bench trial, Angela K. Davis was found guilty

On Petition for Extraordinary Relief PER CURIAM: On November 19, 2007, the petitioner, through counsel, filed a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. In her capacity as VA-appointed fiduciary and curator of deceased veteran Lee T. Richardson, she filed a Notice of Disagreement (NOD) with respect to a VA letter declining to p

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 169) filed by the *1207only remaining Defendants in this case, Wendy Garcia, Lori Holmes, Veronica Kasprzak, Amy Reed, and Charlene Sans

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 5, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARLO DAVIS Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 0701813 W. Mark Ward, Judge No. W2011-01548-SC-R11-CD – Filed June 3, 2015 Sharon