Cases

HINES, Presiding Justice. Mark Anthony Harper appeals from his conviction and sentence for felony murder in connection with the death of Rajib Sarkar. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. 1 In his sole enumeration of error, Harper contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictio

MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT KIMBERLY HARPER AND ) SHARON KAY HARPER, ) WD82465 ) Appellants, ) OPINION FILED: v. )

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered December 20, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed. The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s intent to use a knife unlawfully was clearly established by credible evidence that s

811 A.2d 808 (2002) Barbara HARPER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 01-CM-75. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted November 18, 2002. Decided December 5, 2002. *809 David L. Frecker, was on the brief, for appellant. Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., United States Attorney, and John R. Fisher, R

134 F.Supp.2d 470 (2001) Sharon HARPER, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION, Defendant. No. CIV.A 3:96CV2171 (AVC). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 16, 2001. *471 *472 Sharon Harper, Hartford, CT, pro se. Anthony J. Palermino, Gary R. Atkinson, Hartford, C

Karen King Mitchell, Judge National General Insurance Online, Inc. (Insurer), appeals from the denial of its motion to intervene as a matter of right in an underlying personal injury lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Wunderlich (Husband) *435 against Sharon Wunderlich (Wife). Insurer argues that the trial co

GADOLA, J. Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition under MCE 2.116(C)(8) (failure to state a claim) and MCR 2.116(0(10) (no genuine issue of material fact). We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. FACTS The Harper Woods Retire

USCA11 Case: 20-10150 Document: 90-3 Date Filed: 10/11/2023 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-10150 ____________________ RICKY J. JOHNSON,

USCA11 Case: 20-10150 Document: 90-1 Date Filed: 10/11/2023 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-10150 ____________________ RICKY J. JOHNSON,

OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the deliberate fabrication of evidence by a state official. Devereaux v. Abbey, 263 F.3d 1070, 1074-75 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc). Deliberate fabrication can be established by circumstantial evidence. For example, evidence that officials “continued their investigation of

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 20-1307 _____________ JEFFREY KENGERSKI, Appellant v. ORLANDO HARPER; COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 2

699 F.Supp. 85 (1988) Sharon HARPER, Committee for Roger E. Harper, Jr., Plaintiff, v. WALKER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Tenneco, Inc., McNeil Corporation and Pentair, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. A:87-0800. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Parkersburg Division. November 4, 1988. Thomas W. Pettit and Virginia C. Colburn Vinson, Meek, Lewis & Pettit

LANDRIEU, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. |tI concur in the opinion of the majority insofar as it finds that the plaintiffs have not established a cause of action for civil rights damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and that therefore, the trial court erred by denying the exception of no cause of action filed by DHH. I also concur in the majority’s finding as to the applic

Mr. JUSTICE EARNS delivered the opinion of the court: Petitioner, the Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the Department) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Saline County entered upon a jury verdict in an action to condemn two parcels of real estate owned respectively by defendants Thomas E. Harper and

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS. Concurring opinion by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. ROGERS, Circuit Judge: Sharon Rollins’s son committed suicide using a gun provided by his employer while he was taking prescribed medication manufactured and distributed by two pharmaceutical companies. On appeal from the dismissal of her wrongful death and survival action against the employer

Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 260 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-21-410 Opinion Delivered May 25, 2022 SHARON BAKER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE HOT SPRING COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.

274 B.R. 580 (2002) In re Ronald CONSTANTINO Sharon Constantino a/k/a Sharon Kachmar, Debtors. No. 01-63890. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York. January 14, 2002. Mark W. Swimelar, Esq. (Lynn Harper Wilson, Esq., Of Counsel), Syracuse, NY, Chapter 13 Trustee. James F. Selbach, Esq., Syracuse, NY, for Debtors. MEMORANDUM-DECISION, FINDINGS O

PER CURIAM. The instant action is before this Court upon the appeal of Donna Sue Murray [hereinafter “Appellant”], from a March 21, 2007, order entered by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County granting default judgment against her and assessing punitive damages as part of that judgment in lieu of attorneys *89fees. Herein, the Appellant alleges that it was error for the

Opinion HARPER, J. The plaintiff Sharyn N. D’Urso1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment affirming the order of the Probate Court. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that an attorney may have a valid charging lien on the proceeds of litigation when the representation was based on an hourly fee agreement. We affirm the judgment of

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CT-00913-SCT GAMMA HEALTHCARE INC. AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU v. ESTATE OF SHARON BURRELL GRANTHAM ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/27/2019 TRIBUNAL FROM WHICH MISSISSIPPI WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALED: COMMISSION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: M. REED MARTZ