Cases

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO SHARON SMITH, et al., ) No. ED109668 ) Appellants, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of Washington County vs. ) 19WA-CC

OPINION Arnold B. Goldin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Brandon 0. Gibson J., and Kenny Armstrong, J., joined. The trial court granted Defendant/Ap-pellee’s motion to dismiss based upon expiration of the applicable statute of limitations and made its judgment final pursuant to Tennes

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 7, 2012 Decided December 28, 2012 No. 11-7094 SHARON M. ROLLINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF DEVIN DARRELL BAILEY, APPELLANT v. WACKENHUT SERVICES, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States Di

FILED September 15, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST

Branch, Judge. While pet sitting for Bruce and Jodi Smith, Josephine Gilreath was attacked and injured by the Smiths’ rooster, which caused a serious infection with long-term consequences. Gilreath filed suit, *266 but the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Smiths on the ground tha

FILED July 28, 2025 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA OF WEST VIRGI

623 F.Supp.2d 693 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jody Alton SMITH, Sr., Margaret Smith. Criminal No. 7:07CR00079. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. April 27, 2009. *696 Sharon Burnham, United States Attorneys Office, Roanoke, VA, for United States of America. MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00609-CV Robert Todd Ashmore; R.T. Ashmore, L.L.C.; and C.R. Ashmore Family Partnership Limited, Appellants v. Johnny R. Smith and Sharon Rossberg, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 21,050, HONORABLE GUILFORD L. JONES

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00609-CV Robert Todd Ashmore; R.T. Ashmore, L.L.C.; and C.R

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M. G. LYNN, CHIEF JUDGE Before the Court is Appellant Placid Oil Company’s (“Placid”) appeal of the bankruptcy court’s grant of the Motion to Dismiss filed by Appellees C.C. Abbitt Farms, LLC and J & J Commodities, LLC [ECF No. 1], Placid Oil filed its Brief on March 4, 2016 [ECF No. 7]. C.C. Abbitt Farms and J & J Commodities filed Appellees’ Brief on April 1, 2016.

NEW, J., Plaintiff, Amy R. Smith, Executrix of the Estate of Paul Rowland (“Mr. Rowland”), appeals the October 17, 2013 orders granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Ford Motor Company and the October 18, 2013 order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Borg Warner Corporation (“Borg Warner”). The orders should be affirmed because plaintiff has not established Mr. Rowland’s exposure to products attribu

Opinion issued March 15, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00795-CV ——————————— OLIVER SMITH, Appellant V. SHARON STANDEFER, Appellee

SCHWELB, Senior Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: As the court acknowledges near the conclusion of its opinion, this is indeed a “close case.” That is hardly a rarity in “constructive possession” prosecutions. More than forty years ago, in his concurring opinion in United States v. Holland, 144 U.S.App.D.C. 225, 227-28, 445 F.2d 701, 708-04 (1971), Judge Tamm commented that “

589 S.E.2d 439 (2003) 41 Va. App. 742 Sharon A. SMITH v. Harold E. SMITH, Jr. Record No. 0161-03-1. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Chesapeake. December 9, 2003. Barry Randolph Koch (Inman & Strickler, P.L.C., on briefs), Virginia Beach, for appellant. Megan E. Burns (Stephen G. Test; Williams Mullen, on brief), Virginia Beach, for a

OPINION AND ORDER TERENCE KERN, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on Amount of Appeal-Related Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 299). Plaintiffs request $368,827.50 in attorneys’ fees, $1,942.37 in costs, and any enhancement of the fee award deemed reasonable by the Court. For reasons set. forth below, the motion is granted in the amount of $298,742.77, which includes $296,847

Opinion issued September 22, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The

Cornelia A. Clark, J. In 2014, the General Assembly enacted a statute waiving Tennessee's sovereign immunity for claims brought against the State pursuant to the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301 to 43

*518In an action to recover damages for personal injuries etc., the defendants Sharon M. Smith and Timothy Askew appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.) dated August 20, 2004, which denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with cost

10/09/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 5, 2018 LEWIS CREED JACKSON V. SHARON SMITH JACKSON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Putnam County No. 2012-263 Amy V. Hollars, Chancellor No. M2018-00361-COA-R3-CV The par

SHAW, Justice (concurring in the result). I agree with the implicit holding in the main opinion rejecting the arguments of Robert Bosch LLC that Dorothy Kilgo’s discovery of the algorithm Bosch claims as a trade secret is not “necessary” in Kilgo’s case and that the need for disclosure of the algorithm does not outweigh the potential harm to Bosch from its disclosure. I fur