Cases

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Supplemental Class Action Complaint for Violation of ERISA. Defendants Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. (“Morgan Keegan”) and Morgan Asset Management (“MAM”) filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 10, 2009. Also on April 10

EDMONDSON, J. 11 Appellants are a licensed bail bondsman and several insurance companies that issue bail bonds who complain that the defendant, Curt Pletcher, a registered professional bail bondsman in Tulsa County, is violating the Ten Bond Rule, 59 0.8.2011 $ 1320(B), of the Oklahoma Bail Bondsmen Act by using a surety bondsman to write more than ten *459bonds per y

OPINION SHARON McCALLY, Justice. Appellant Amber Brittain appeals from an order adjudicating parentage, in which the court ordered the surname of a child born to Brittain and appellee David Chali-foux to be changed from Brittain to Chali-foux. In three issues, Brittain argues that the trial court impermissibly considered “tradition” evidence, and the eviden

OPINION Holly Kirby, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Sharon G. Lee, and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined. We granted this interlocutory appeal to address whether an employee may assert a private right of action against her employer under

498 P.2d 1267 (1972) 94 Idaho 794 Patsy HAMBY, Claimant-Appellant, v. J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, Employer, and Argonaut-Northwest Insurance Company, Surety, Defendants-Respondents. No. 10950. Supreme Court of Idaho. June 12, 1972. *1268 James Annest, Burley, for claimant-appellant. John W. Barrett, of Mo

PIERCE, Justice, specially concurring: ¶ 20. While I concur with the majority’s holding and analysis, I cannot join the majority opinion where it adopts the analysis found in In re: Dissolution of Marriage of Leverock and Hamby, 23 So.3d 424 (Miss.2009). Specifically, the majority discusses this Court’s finding that the father in Leverock “deserted his son by ‘completely avoiding] both

PER CURIAM. The plaintiffs, Dorothy Ellis York, Sharon York Alemany, Michelle York Hamby, and Tina York Sunderland, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant, Joy Ann York, in this diversity inheritance dispute governed by Georgia law. Joy Ann York, a Georgia resident, is the fourth wife of Lloyd York, who died on December 7,1998, in Dade County, Georgia. Plaintiff Dorothy Ellis York was Lloyd York

473 F.Supp. 878 (1979) Vera E. GARY, Perry Smith, Karen R. Davis, and Sharon E. Hamby, Individually and as representatives of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. J. Fred SPIRES, Individually and in his official capacity as Administrator of the Check Clearing House for Lexington County, American Fire & Casualty Insurance of Orlando, Florida, Piggly Wiggly Corporation, Inc., Bi-Lo, Inc. and Fogles Food City, Defendants.

OPINION CORNELIA A. CLARK, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., and JANICE M. HOLDER, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ, joined. The issue in this appeal is whether the statutory requirements for execution of an attested will prescribed by Tennessee Code Annota

OPINION CORNELIA A. CLARK, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., and JANICE M. HOLDER, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. We granted permission to appeal in this premises liability action to address two issues: (1) whether the undisputed facts establish

CLIFF HOOFMAN, Judge. |, Acker Construction, LLC, appeals from a judgment entered by the Scott County Circuit Court in favor of appellee, Hanh Billy Tran, in the amount of $68,307 for the cost of repairing seven chicken houses that appellant built for appellee and for appellee’s lost profits resulting from appellant’s delay in performance. On appeal, appellant raises four points: (1) the trial court e

Dillard, Judge. The State appeals the trial court’s grant of Catherine Lindsey Able and Tyler Bridges Selph’s joint motion to suppress evidence, contending that the trial court erred by basing its decision solely on a dislike of police officers’ “knock and talk” procedures. Because we agree that the trial court erred in its basis for granting the motion to suppress, we vacate the trial court’s order and remand for reconsider

OPINION CORNELIA A. CLARK, J„ delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. We granted this appeal to determine whether a tenured teacher’s failure to return from sick leave amounts to a constructive resignation or

320 S.W.3d 273 (2010) Candace MULLINS v. STATE of Tennessee. No. M2008-01674-SC-R11-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. June 2, 2010 Session Heard at Cookeville.[1] September 17, 2010. *275 Phillip L. Davidson, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Candace Mullins. Robert E. Cooper,

KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In this custody dispute between the natural father and the maternal grand*35mother, the chancellor granted custody to the father, finding that the father had not deserted his child. Although the grandmother had stood in loco parentis to the child since the mother’s death, the chancellor correctly recognized

TOOKEY, J. BP West Coast Products, LLP (BP) challenges the validity of OAR 137-020-0150, a rule adopted by the Attorney General, which pertains to a service station’s posting of gas prices on signs visible from the street and dispensing devices. BP argues that “[t]he Administrative Rule’s definition of ‘condition’ and all portions of the Rule that incorporate or rely on the definition of ‘condition’ are invalid because they ex

Martin R. Barash, United States Bankruptcy Judge *648I. INTRODUCTION This adversary proceeding arises out of the prepetition acquisition of a secured loan by defendant Radians Wareham Holding, Inc. ("RWHI") and the prepetition exercise of remedies under that loan agreement against the chapter 11 debtors herein, Ironclad Perfor

SEARS, Presiding Justice. The appellant, Harold Vaughn, appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the appellee, Sharon Stoenner, on Vaughn’s claims regarding title to a certain tract of land in Jackson County, Georgia. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Stoenner on Vaughn’s claim for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement that Stoenner would give him her interes

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on appeal by defendant-debtor (“defendant”) of a final order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina granting summary judgment in favor plaintiffs-appellees (“plaintiffs”) on a claim of nondischargeability, under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). See generally LeCann v. Cobham (In re Co

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli