Cases

481 F.Supp.2d 1156 (2007) Lois SHARER and Steve Humber, Plaintiffs, v. State of OREGON, Peter Ozanne, and Peter Gartlan, Defendants. No. 04-CV-1690-BR. United States District Court, D. Oregon. March 30, 2007. *1157 Lois Sharer, Steve Humber, Phoenix, OR, Plaintiffs, Pro Se. Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Eric D. Wilson, As

935 A.2d 457 (2007) 177 Md. App. 340 Charlain BLAND v. Joseph HAMMOND, et al. No. 1843, September Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 6, 2007. *459 Chantelle M. Custodio (Paul A. Turkheimer, Meyers, Rodbell & Rosenbaum PA on the brief), Riverdale Park, for appellant. James

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John Robert Blakey, United States District Judge This is a purported nationwide class action brought under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g). ■ Section 1681c(g) requires, among other things, that ho credit or debit card receipt contain “more than the last 5 digits of the card number.” Plaintiff Joseph Rosen, the putativ

968 A.2d 1104 (2009) 185 Md. App. 171 Karen HALLORAN v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, et al. No. 219, September Term, 2008. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 31, 2009. *1108 H. David Leibensperger (Craig Meyers, Berman, Sobin & Gross, LLP on the brief), Gaithersburg, for appel

74 B.R. 187 (1987) In re CHURCHILL DEVELOPMENT LTD., Debtor. DEL WEBB COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES CORPORATION, Movant, v. CHURCHILL DEVELOPMENT LTD., Respondent. Bankruptcy No. 86-3698-PHX-SSC, Adv. No. "A". United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona. March 27, 1987. Frederick K. Steiner, Jr., Patrick E. Hoog, Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, Ariz., for Del Webb. C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 23-257 (TSC) DONALD J. TRUMP, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States has charged former President Donald J. Trump with four counts of criminal conduct, which he is alleged to have committed du

98 B.R. 2 (1989) In re RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS CORPORATION, Debtor. THOMSON McKINNON SECURITIES, INC., Movant, v. RESIDENTIAL RESOURCES MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS CORPORATION, Respondents. Bankruptcy No. B-89-0200, Adv. Nos. "B" and 89-53. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona. February 16, 1989. As Corrected April 13, 1989.

Leslie E. Kobayashi, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Oahu Interscholastic Association's ("OIA") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs A.B., by her parents and next friends, C.B. and D.B., and T.T., by her parents and next friends, K.T. and S.T.'s Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Filed December 6, 2018 ("Motion"), filed on January 18, 2019. [Dkt. no. 22.] Plaintiffs A.B., by her parents and next fri

216 F.3d 1168 (D.C. Cir. 2000) Western Coal Traffic League, et al.,Petitionersv.Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, RespondentsNorfolk Southern Corporation, et al., Intervenors Nos. 00-1115, 00-1118, 00-1120 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued June 13, 2000Decided July 14, 2000

875 A.2d 807 (2005) 162 Md. App. 588 Gary McMAHON v. Ada Inez PIAZZE. No. 1776, Sept. Term, 2004. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 7, 2005. *808 Thomas S. Rand, Jr., Rockville, for appellant. *809 Morris Topf, Bethesda, for appellee. Panel SHARER

18 A.3d 110 (2011) 198 Md. App. 452 The UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IN the CITY OF NEW YORK, et al. v. Elizabeth WILSON. No. 2544, September Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 28, 2011. *112 Adrienne C. Publicover, San Francisco, CA (Cynthia Maskol, Angela W. Russell, Wilson E

Balt. City Police Dep’t v. Robinson, No. 764, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Graeff, J. PUBLIC SAFETY — LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS’ BILL OF RIGHTS — DISPOSITION OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION — PENALTY RECOMMENDATION The Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (“LEOBR”), Md. Code Ann. (2018 Repl. Vol.), §§ 3-101–113 of the Public Safety Article (“PS”), guarantees law enforcement officers procedural safeguards before disciplinary action. The final decision of the head of a law enforcemen

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff, Patrick Collins, Inc. (“Collins”) commenced this action against John Does 1 through 9, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 106 and § 501, alleging direct and indirect copyright infringement of the Plaintiff’s film “Gangbanged.” Presently before the Court are objections to a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown

899 A.2d 940 (2006) 169 Md. App. 109 WILLARD PACKAGING COMPANY, INC. v. Demetrio I. JAVIER. No. 2097, September Term, 2004. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 1, 2006. *942 Philip R. Murray, Wheaton, for appellant. William M. Krulak, Jr. (Rachel T. McGuckian, Miles & Stockbridge, on brie

Office of the Director New Mexico 13:39:18 2022.07.26 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-026 Filing Date: June 30, 2021 No. S-1-SC-38356 SEN. CLIFF PIRTLE, REP. ZACH COOK, REP. REBECCA DOW, SEN. CRAIG BRANDT, REP. WILLIE MA

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge. Before the Court is Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Dollar Tree”) Mo*466tion to Decertify the Collective Action. Defendant filed its Motion to Decertify (ECF No. 405) on September 13, 2013 and its Corrected Memorandum in Support of the Motion (ECF No. 407) on Se

607 F.Supp.2d 1281 (2009) ANDY'S MUSIC, INC., Plaintiff, v. ANDY'S MUSIC, INC., Defendant. No. CA 08-0463-KD-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. April 16, 2009. *1283 Larry Wayne Brantley, Huntsville, AL, for Plaintiff. Matthew Lee Huffaker, Maynard, Cooper, and Gale P.C., Birmingham, AL, for

In re S.F., No. 582, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Nazarian, J. JUVENILE DIVISION – CONDITION OF PROBATION – SCHOOL SUSPENSION A no-suspension condition of probation for a juvenile defendant is permissible because the defendant, school administrators, and the defendant’s probation officer are guided by the school district’s disciplinary handbook as to which behaviors are or are not grounds for suspension. Further, a non-suspension condition of probation i

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: _______________ 3 Filing Date: August 11, 2015 4 NO. 33,630 5 KATHERINE MORRIS, M.D., AROOP 6 MANGALIK, M.D., and AJA RIGGS, 7 Plaintiffs-Appellees, 8 v. 9 KARI BRANDENBURG, in her official capacity 10 as District Attorney for Bernalillo County, New 11 Mexico, and GARY KING, in his official capacity 12 as Attorney General of the State of New Mexico, 13 Defendants-Appellants. 14 APP

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 16:56:48 2015.09.22 Certiorari Granted, August 31, 2015, No. 35,478 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opini