⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Shannon v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois”

District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2015-12-09 · Published · cited 1× · 149 F. Supp. 3d 1027; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164872; 2015 WL 8301461
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LARRY J. McKINNEY, JUDGE Plaintiff Nicholas Hess (“Hess”) has moved for summary judgment. on his •claims- against Defendants, The -Board of Trustees - of Southern Illinois -University (“SIU”), Chad Trisler individually and in his. official. capacity (“Trisler”), Katherin Sermersheim, individually (“Sermer-sheim”), and Rita Cheng, individually (“Cheng”) (Defen
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-01-27 · Published · cited 60× · 890 N.W.2d 50; 47 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20017; 2017 WL 382402; 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 7
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0076 Filed January 27, 2017 BOARD OF WATER WORKS TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA, Appellant, vs. SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS TRUSTEE OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and CALHOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AS JOINT TRUSTEES OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 2 AND 51 and BUENA VISTA COUNTY BOAR
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-01-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0076 Filed January 27, 2017 BOARD OF WATER WORKS TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA, Appellant, vs. SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS TRUSTEE OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and CALHOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AS JOINT TRUSTEES OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 2 AND 51 and BUENA VISTA COUNTY BOAR
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-01-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–0076 Filed January 27, 2017 Amended April 11, 2017 BOARD OF WATER WORKS TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA, Appellant, vs. SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS TRUSTEE OF DRAINAGE DISTRICTS 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and CALHOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and SAC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AS JOINT TRUSTEES OF DRAINAG
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019-02-14 · Published · cited 18× · 915 F.3d 956
KRAUSE, Circuit Judge. Jerome McKinney, a longtime, tenured professor at the University of Pittsburgh's Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, challenges the University's decision to reduce his salary as a violation of the Due Process Clause. Based largely on the negative implications that can be drawn from a University policy that discusses salary increases but nowhere
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999-02-03 · Published · cited 2× · 35 F. Supp. 2d 1118; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1591; 1999 WL 76149
35 F.Supp.2d 1118 (1999) Rita HARPER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF REGENTS, ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. No. 95-1371. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. February 3, 1999. *1119 Raymond C. Rose, Kanoski Rose & Assoc., Peoria, IL, Daniel V. Kinsella, David M. Rownd, Burditt & Radzius, Chicago,
Texas Supreme Court · 2020-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
FILED 18-0351 5/22/2020 2:52 PM tex-43191602
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022-09-13 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District  SHANNON ROBINSON, ET AL.,   Respondents,  v.   MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF  HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES,
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00113-CV 5989837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/8/2015
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 182 F. Supp. 3d 282; 2016 WL 1580336; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52894
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT Terrence F. McVerry, Senior United States District Judge Pending before the Court is a MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (EOF No. 23) filed by Defendant University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine (the “University”).1 The issues have been fully-briefed by the University and Plaintiff Chloe Rey in their memoranda (ECF No. 24, 30, 36), and the
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FIREFIGHTERS’ PENSION SYSTEM OF ) THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI ) TRUST, on behalf of itself and all other ) similarly situated stockholders of ) PRESIDIO, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-09-21 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00556-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:14:05 PM CHRIST
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
In re Shannonpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018-09-07 · Published · cited 6× · 590 B.R. 467
Carol A. Doyle, United States Bankruptcy Judge Timothy Shannon, the debtor in a chapter 13 bankruptcy case, seeks the return of his car from the City of Chicago. The City impounded Shannon's car before he filed his bankruptcy petition. He filed a plan treating the City's claim as unsecured. The City filed an unsecured proof of claim and did not object to the plan, which was confirmed. After confirmation, however, the City refused to
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00882-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 8:14:08 PM CHRISTOPHER
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015-10-26 · Published · cited 0× · 45 N.E.3d 458; 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 692; 2015 WL 6447550
NAJAM, Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Adam Gaff appeals the trial court’s grant of Indiana University-Purdue University of Fort Wayne’s (“IPFWs”) motion for summary judgment. Gaff raises four issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as the following three issues: 1. Whether the trial court erred when it concluded