Cases

ORDER MARK H. COHEN, United States District Judge This case comes before the Court on Defendants Insperity, Inc., Insperity Retirement Services, L.P., Insperity Holdings, Inc., and Insperity Retirement Plan Committee’s (collectively, the “Insperity Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [Doc. 29], Defendant Reliance Trust Company’s (“Reliance”) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [Doc.. 32], the Insperi

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-24-00294-CV __________________ MORGAN GENTRY CARTWRIGHT AND JOE SHANNON CARTWRIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY, AS TRUSTEES OF THE CARTWRIGHT FAMILY INSURANCE TRUST, AND AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00049-CV ___________________________ KEITH MORVANT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE AND ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHNA MORVANT, DECEASED; AND LYNNE FREDERICK, Appellants V. DALLAS A

PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge. Introduction Gebar Byrd (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of second-degree murder, first-degree involuntary manslaughter, first-degree endangering the welfare of a child, and second-degree domestic assault. Defendant claims the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for judgment

799 N.E.2d 479 (2003) 343 Ill. App.3d 1050 278 Ill.Dec. 761 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecil CRAWFORD Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-00-3672. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. October 8, 2003. *480 Michael J. Pelletier, Office

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: _______________ 3 Filing Date: April 13, 2017 4 NO. 34,914 5 KATHLEEN M. OAKEY, Personal Representative 6 of the Estate of TAWANA LUCERO, deceased, 7 Plaintiff-Appellant, 8 v. 9 MAY MAPLE PHARMACY, INC., 10 Defendant-Appellee. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 12 C. Shannon Bacon, District Judge 13 Fine Law Firm 14 Mark Fine 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 Fuqua Law & Policy,

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 11:47:41 2017.08.16 Certiorari Denied, June 12, 2017, No. S-1-SC-36470 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

*1227ante, p. 820; 534 U. S. 917; ante, p. 88; ante, p. 1044; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 839; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 853; *1228No. 01-1

694 P.2d 1382 (1985) 102 N.M. 317 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Seth SPARKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 7714. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. January 15, 1985. OPINION ALARID, Judge. Defendant, Seth Sparks, appeals from his convictions on nine counts of making false statements contrary to NMSA 1978, Section

OPINION Opinion by Justice BENAVIDES. Appellants, Ramon and Anita Garcia, appeal from two orders granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, State Farm Lloyds (“State Farm”). By four issues, the Garcias contend the trial court erred in overruling their objections to State Farm’s summary judgment evidence, sustaining State Farm’s objections to their summary judgment evidence, and in gr

NUMBER 13-07-00381-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRI

NUMBER 13-07-00381-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG RAMON AND ANITA GARCIA, Appellants, v. STATE FARM LLOYDS, Appellee. On appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Appellant Kenneth Bell (“Bell”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him on two counts of -first-degree murder and one count of armed criminal action. On appeal, Bell argues that the trial court clearly erred in denying a pretrial motion to suppress Bell’s confession. Be

DENIED.

530 So.2d 1294 (1988) Theodore James ALLEN and Kija Claire Love Allen, Plaintiffs-Appellees Appellants, v. Gerald L. BURNETT and Marsha Elliott Burnett, Defendants-Appellants Appellees. No. 19842-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 17, 1988. Rehearing Denied September 21, 1988. *1295 Davidson

FOX, P. J. — This cause is now before this court upon appeal by the defendant from a judgment ad-measuring to her homestead and dower in certain real estate of which her husband died seized. We deem it unnecessary to reproduce the pleadings in this cause, therefore will be content with a mere reference to them indicating their nature and character. The respondents,' as the children and legatees of John Q. Davis

139 Cal.App.3d 407 (1983) 188 Cal. Rptr. 781 Guardianship of PHILLIP B., a Minor. HERBERT H. et al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. WARREN B. et al., Objectors and Appellants. Docket No. 53419. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. January 25, 1983. *411 COUNSEL M. Van S

Mr. Justice Neil delivered the opinion of the Court. The plaintiff in error was indicted in the circuit court of Hardin county for the larceny of fifty gallons of whis-ky. The testimony showed that he stole at least one gallon, and he was convicted of petit larceny and sentenced to eighteen months’ confinement in the State penitentiary. He has appealed from the judgment of the court below, an

Stayton, Associate Justice. The lot in controversy was community property, owned by Herman Yungst and his wife, and it was their homestead. Hnder the findings of the jury, for the present consideration of this case, it must be held that the conveyance from Yungst and wife, of date March 15, 1882, was intended simply as a mortgage to secure the payment of a sum of money then borrowed by Yungst from W. J. and J. J. Settegast. <