Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE MAY SESSION, 1998 FILED July 1, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) No. 01C01-9707-CC-00258 Appellee )

592 S.E.2d 525 (2003) 264 Ga. App. 893 RUST v. The STATE. Rowe v. The State. Nos. A03A2581, A03A2582. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 19, 2003. *526 Wm. Lee Robinson, for appellant (case no. A03A2581). *527 Adams, Hemingway & Wilson, Scott C

[Cite as Hopper v. Landen Auto Mart, L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-2275.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY ANDREW J. HOPPER, : Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2024-10-070 : OPINION - vs -

ACCEPTED 08-21-00135-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 08-21-00135-CV

ORDER Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on plaintiffs motion for class certification, docket no. 82. Having reviewed all papers filed in support of, and in opposition to, plaintiffs motion, the Court enters the following order. Background This case concerns the practice of “mobile cramming,” which is the prac

510 F.Supp.2d 1124 (2007) GE PACKAGED POWER, INC. and General Electric International, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. READINESS MANAGEMENT SUPPORT, L.C., Defendant. No. 1:05-CV-1517-WSD. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. January 12, 2007. *1125 *1126 Charles Scott Greene, Curt

ACCEPTED 08-21-00135-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 11/2/2021 1:41 PM 08-21-00135-CV ELIZABETH G. FLORES

660 F.3d 605 (2011) Patrick L. GEARREN, Jan Deperry, Mary Sullivan, Harvey Sullivan, and Cynthia Davis, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE McGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INCORPORATED, The Pension Investment Committee of McGraw-Hill, Marty Martin, The Board of Directors of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Incorporated, Winfried Bischoff, Douglas N. Daft, Linda Koch Lorimer, Harold McGraw, Hilda Ochoa-Brillem

785 P.2d 417 (1990) Stuart H. STAKER, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Noal D. AINSWORTH, Juanita Ainsworth Fox, David Ainsworth, Lynn Ainsworth, Jean Ainsworth, Jack Ainsworth, Beth Ainsworth, Freedom Yocum, Jr., Edna Yocum, Robert J. Holmes, Grant S. Jensen, Paul E. Holmes, Bruce E. Holmes, Helen Holmes, James Roger Shane and Elfriede Shane, Defendants and Appellees. Noal D. AINSWORTH, Juanita Ainsworth Fox, David Ainsworth, Lynn Ainsworth, Jean

741 P.2d 938 (1987) Joseph MASCARO and Shelby Taylor, individuals, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. John S. DAVIS, Charley Joseph, Curtis Baum, individuals, and Chatillion, Inc., a Utah corporation, Defendants and Respondents. No. 19024. Supreme Court of Utah. July 6, 1987. Rehearing Denied August 28, 1987. *939 Cha

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-IA-01829-SCT GRACELAND CARE CENTER OF NEW ALBANY, LLC, ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC., KAREN CLAYTON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF GRACELAND CARE CENTER OF NEW ALBANY, W. LARRY OVERSTREET AND SHARON WINDHAM v. TERESA HAMLET, ON BEHALF OF JIMMY KINARD, DECEASED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/17/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN KELLY LUT

879 P.2d 101 (1994) 118 N.M. 100 Nathan B. FERNANDEZ, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor E. Fernandez, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Tessie Fernandez, as Parent and Guardian of Jason Fernandez and Jonathan Fernandez, Involuntary Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, CMI Corporation, Rust Equipment Company, Broce Construction Company, and Richardson Ford Sales, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and<

612 S.E.2d 39 (2005) 272 Ga. App. 172 WILSON et al. v. ALLEN. No. A04A1768. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 14, 2005. *40 Edward Miller, Lindsey Mehan, Gary, Rust, St. Amand, Moffett & Brieske, LLP, Atlanta, for Appellants. Benny Martin, P.C., Jasper, for Appellee. RUFFIN, Chief Judge.

I concur in the result because of the manner in which the issue of payment of *Page 346 or reimbursement for transportation expenses to and from work appears to have been addressed in the trial court, but not in the appellant's initial brief to this Court. In so doing, I do not wish to be understood as suggesting that the exception to the general rule (that an employee's negligence while traveling to and from work does not subject an employer to v

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS. EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge: The HarUScott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the “Act” or “HSR Act”) was passed by Congress “[t]o improve and facilitate the expeditious and effective enforcement of the antitrust laws.” Pub.L. No. 94-435, 90 Stat. 1383, 1383 (codified as amended at 15

872 A.2d 282 (2005) I. Shane OLSHANSKY, et al. v. REHRIG INTERNATIONAL, et al. No. 2004-184-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 3, 2005. *285 Desiree M. Santilli, Providence, for Plaintiffs. Michelle M. Lataille, for Defendants. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, SUTTELL, and ROBINSON, JJ. </

GARY W. LYNCH, J. Shane Hurst appeals the trial court’s judgment declaring that Ina Wade amended her trust by oral statements and written memoranda and consequently awarding Ina’s farm to James Massey.1 In his second of three points on appeal, Shane asserts that the judgment is against the weight of the evidence. We agree, reverse the judgment, and remand the case for further proceedings consiste

Slip Op 16 - 88 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE : REBAR TRADE ACTION COALITION, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge : UNITED STATES,

(2007) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael CHERTOFF, et al., Defendants. No. C 07-04472 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 10, 2007. ORDERER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. On August 15, 2007, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) promulgated a

Peterson, Justice. This appeal in a personal injury case arising from an automobile accident is before this Court on certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. At issue is the proper interpretation of OCGA § 9-11-67.1, which governs the formation of settlement agreements pursuant to a pre-suit “offer to settle a tort claim for personal injury, bodily injury, or death arising from the