Cases

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to evaluate the constitutionality of the cavity search at issue here under the “reasonable suspicion” standard we developed in Weber v. Dell, 804 F.2d 796, 802 (2d Cir.1986), rather than under the “reasonably related to legitimate penological objectives” standard subsequently articulated by the Suprem

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-18-00027-CR Shain Michael Pugh, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 76930, THE HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

B.D. PARKER, JR., Circuit Judge. Nassau County and its named employees ( “Nassau County”) challenge an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Leonard D. Wexler, Judge). The court enjoined Nassau County from strip searching misdemeanor admittees to the Nassau County *213Correctional Center (“NCCC”) absent individualized suspicio

356 F.3d 211 Ray E. SHAIN, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.John ELLISON, individually and as a Nassau County Police Officer, John Doe, individually and as an Assistant District Attorney of Nassau County, The County of Nassau, a Municipal Corporation, and Joseph Jablonsky, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,James H. MADDEN, individually and as a Judge of Nassau County, Defendant. No. 02-9262(L).

106 Cal.App.3d 294 (1980) 165 Cal. Rptr. 69 FRANCES D. SHAIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF ALBANY, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 44715. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. May 29, 1980. *296 COUNSEL Barbagelata, Carmazzi, Arnold & Del Bino and Robert D. Ba

273 F.3d 56 (2nd Cir. 2001) RAY E. SHAIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT,v.JOHN ELLISON, (SHIELD NO. 761), INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A NASSAU COUNTY POLICE OFFICER; JOHN DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NASSAU COUNTY; THE COUNTY OF NASSAU, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; JOSEPH JABLONSKY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-APPELLEES,JAMES H. MADDEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A JUDGE OF NASSAU COUNTY, DEFENDANT-CROSS-APPELLEE.

233 F.Supp.2d 241 (2002) Richard JOHNSON, et al. v. Rodney C. COLLINS, et al. No. CV-02-531-JM. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. December 4, 2002. *242 *243 Paul McEachern, Shaines & McEachern PA, Portsmouth, NH, for Plaintiff. William G. Scott, Boynton, Waldron, Dole

675 F.Supp.2d 236 (2009) 2009 DNH 194 Brian J. JOHNSON v. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. Civil No. 09-CV-282-JL. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. December 18, 2009. *239 Paul McEachern, Robert A. Shaines, Shaines & McEachern PA, Portsmouth, NH, for Brian J. Johnson.

Opinion issued June 3, 2004 In The Court of Appeals For The

324 Pa. Superior Ct. 456 (1984) 471 A.2d 1246 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Stephen SHAIN, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted October 3, 1983. Filed January 20, 1984. Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied June 7, 1984. *460 John Paul Curran, Philadelphia, for appellant

915 F.Supp. 575 (1996) Myron SHAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DUFF & PHELPS CREDIT RATING COMPANY, Defendant. No. 94 Civ. 0721(WK)(AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 16, 1996. *576 Daniel C. Girard, Girard & Green, San Francisco, CA, Plaintiffs' Lia

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED Fall 2024 Term December 27, 2024 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK

835 F.Supp. 685 (1993) Peter A. JOHNSON v. SHAINES & McEACHERN, P.A. No. C-93-238-L. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. June 28, 1993. *686 Edgar D. McKean III, McKean, Mattson & Latici, P.A., Gilford, NH, for plaintiffs Peter A. Johnson and Grassy Knoll Associates. Richard W. Renehan, Hill & Barlo

This is an original proceeding in certiorari to review for conflict with our decisions the opinion of the respondents *Page 894 in Anderson Motor Service Company v. Sterling (Mo. App.), 121 S.W.2d 275. That was an action in equity to set aside a default judgment obtained at a prior term by the defendant Sterling, the relator in this proceeding, against the plaintiff company and to enjoin the enforcement of the judgment. [1] The trial court found for the p

Certiorari to the Kansas City Court of Appeals bringing up the opinion and judgment of that court in the case of Lola G. Powell (plaintiff), respondent, v. Hortense Brosnahan (defendant), appellant. Plaintiff's action, brought under the wrongful death statute, was for damages for the death of her husband, James E. Powell, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act and negligence of the defendant. Plaintiff prevailed in the trial court and the judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals

Certiorari to test the correctness of the ruling, under our latest controlling decisions, of the Kansas City Court of Appeals in a cause styled The Lampton Realty Co. v. Hoyt (Mo. App.), 80 S.W.2d 249, holding, briefly stated, the assignee of a contract for the purchase of real estate from the vendee-assignor personally liable to the vendor for certain monetary obligations imposed by said contract upon said original vendee as evidenced by the provisions of said contract and also, in part, by

Certiorari to the judges of the Kansas City Court of Appeals, bringing up the record of that court in Brown v. Alton Railroad Co., 132 S.W.2d 713. The action was based on the wrongful death statute, for the negligent killing of plaintiff's husband in a collision between one of relator's motor trains and a trailer-truck carrying cattle, at a highway crossing in Marshall. The deceased was one of three passengers on the truck, the other two being another handler of the cattle and the truck drive

* NOTE: Opinion filed at the May Term, 1938, August 8, 1938; motion for rehearing filed; motion overruled at September Term, September 6, 1938. Certiorari to the judges of the Kansas City Court of Appeals bringing up the record of that court in Breit v. Bowland,100 S.W.2d 599. The case was tried in the Andrew County Circuit Court and appealed to this court. We transferred it to the Kan

Certiorari to quash the opinion of the Kansas City Court of Appeals in Fawkes v. National Refining Co., 130 S.W.2d 684. In that case the Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment for plaintiff for personal injuries. On the night in question the motor of a truck owned by C.H. Stinnett would not function. Assuming that the truck was without gas, Stinnett and companion pushed it to the filing station of the defendant company and purchased gasoline. Even then the mot

461 F.Supp.2d 48 (2006) Dianna JOHNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-2364 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 14, 2006. *49 Louis Allan Kleiman, Arlington, VA, William Charles Cole Claiborne, III, Law Offices of William Claiborne, Washington,