Cases

*31OPINION OF THE COURT Leonard B. Austin, J. Introduction Defendants LexisNexis, Reed Elsevier PLC Group and James Haggerty move for an order (a) pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (4), (5) and (7) dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint, and (b) dismissing all claims against codefendant James Haggerty based on the failure to properly effectuat

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge *5I. Background...6 II. Standard of Review...7 III. Jurisdiction...7 IV. Analysis...8 A. Whether plaintiffs have adequately alleged damages for nine of their eleven claims...9 1. Plaintiffs must allege actual damages for ni

(2008) Terrell CAUDLE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TOWERS, PERRIN, FORSTER & CROSBY, INC., Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 2480(PKC)(DFE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge. Plaintiff Terrell Caudle, individually and on

23 F.Supp.2d 287 (1998) CLEVELAND WRECKING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HERCULES CONSTRUCTION CORP., and Hercules Construction and Development, Inc., Defendants. No. 95-CV-1078 (JS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 29, 1998. *288 *289 *290

908 F.Supp. 1142 (1995) Lynda BROOKS; Verna Hobson; Geraldine Bavaro; Harriet Eaton; Jane Doe; and Richard Doe, as parents and guardians of, respectively, Michael Brooks; Theresa Hobson; Lisa Bavaro; Jill Eaton; Joe Doe; and Rachel Roe, Plaintiffs, v. George E. PATAKI, as Governor of the State of New York; Rudolph W. Giuliani, as Mayor of the City of New York; Thomas A. Maul; Joel A. Dvoskin; Mary Glass; Marva Livingston Hammons, as Commissioners

101 F.Supp.2d 204 (2000) In re HORIZON CRUISES LITIGATION. In re Litigation Joint Discovery M/V Horizon Legionnaires Disease. Celebrity Cruises Inc., and Fantasia Cruising Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Essef Corp., PAC-FAB, Inc., and Structural Europe N.V. (f/n/a SFC), Defendants. Nos. 94 CIV. 5270(BSJ)(JCF), 94 CIV. 6147(BSJ)(JCF), 95 CIV. 0374 (BSJ)(JCF), 96 CIV. 3135(BSJ)(JCF). United States District

ORDER ANN ALDRICH, District Judge. On September 22, 1994, the plaintiffs filed a motion (Doc. # 117) that this action be maintained as a class action. For the reasons stated below, this Court hereby denies plaintiffs’ motion. I. This action is brought by a number of women who claim they have suffered damage to their reproductive systems due to their expos

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. This action arises out of a criminal intrusion into a computer network system used to provide online gaming and Internet connectivity via an individual’s gaming console or personal computer. Plaintiffs, a nationwide putative consumer clas

*965ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ANTHEM DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART NON-ANTHEM DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 410, 413 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs1 bring this putative class action against Anthem,