Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 335 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 336 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

366 F.Supp.2d 597 (2004) NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC., d/b/a Yale Materials Handling Corporation, Plaintiff, v. TOYOTA MATERIALS HANDLING USA, INC., and The Lilly Company, Defendants. No. 03-2561 BA. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. November 23, 2004. *598 *599<

903 S.W.2d 600 (1995) Steven L. SHAFFER and Larry E. Schell, Plaintiffs/Respondents/Appellants, v. FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant/Respondent. Nos. 19683, 19687. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. July 14, 1995. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied August 3, 1995. *601

705 N.E.2d 539 (1999) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellant-Defendant, v. Vicki AMMERMAN, Guardian of Pamela Ammerman and Lana Ammerman, Appellees-Plaintiffs. No. 49A05-9608-CV-322. Court of Appeals of Indiana. February 12, 1999. Rehearing Denied April 7, 1999. *544 Stanley C. Fickle, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS : ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES : STANLEY C. FICKLE KARL L. MULVANEY Barnes & Thornburg NANA QUAY-SMITH Indianapolis, Indiana ANDREA M. ROBERTS CANDACE L. SAGE PAUL F. HULTIN

359 Pa. Superior Ct. 238 (1986) 518 A.2d 1213 Peter H. SHAFFER, Administrator of the Estate of Gail F. Jakovac and Trustee Ad Litem of Keirsten Leigh Jakovac and Gerald Jakovac v. PENNSYLVANIA ASSIGNED CLAIMS PLAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. Appeal of NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. A

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Defendant The American Suzuki Motor Corporation appeals a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio, entered in favor of plaintiff-appellee Jeffrey Williams. American Suzuki Motor Corporation, hereinafter referred to as ASMC, assigns five errors to the trial court: {¶ 2} "I. THE DIVIDED JURY'S VERDICT IN FAV

80 Md. App. 695 (1989) 566 A.2d 135 GEORGE WILLIAM NICHOLSON, JR. v. YAMAHA MOTOR COMPANY, LIMITED, ET AL. No. 362, September Term, 1989. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 1, 1989. Edward T. Pinder (William J. Blondell, Jr., on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Steven M. Levine and Walter J. Smith, Jr. (Wilson, Elser,

BECK, Judge: Appellees Gerald Jakovac (Gerald) and Peter H. Shaffer1 filed claims against Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide) and Insurance Company of North America (INA) under the No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (No-fault Act)2 and the Uninsured Motorist Act.3 The court granted INA’s motions for summary judgment, and INA w

781 F.Supp. 1079 (1992) John A. GALLAGHER, et al. v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC., et al. Civ. A. No. 91-6640. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 6, 1992. *1080 M. Patricia Carroll, Carroll & Carroll, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs. *1081 Mary Grace Maley, L

525 F.Supp. 1265 (1981) In re MID-ATLANTIC TOYOTA ANTITRUST LITIGATION. MARYLAND ex rel. SACHS v. MID-ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al. DELAWARE ex rel. GEBELEIN v. MID-ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al. WEST VIRGINIA ex rel. BROWNING v. MID-ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ex rel. ROGERS v. MID-ATLANTIC TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al. COMMONWEALTH OF PE

169 Ga. App. 610 (1984) 314 S.E.2d 453 HOLMAN MOTOR COMPANY v. EVANS. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U. S. A., INC. v. EVANS et al. 67000, 67001. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided January 31, 1984. Charles A. Wiley, Jr., Eve A. Appelbaum, for appellant (case no. *615 67000). Douglas R.

713 F.Supp. 823 (1989) John E. VERNA, an Incompetent, by his Father and Guardian, George J. VERNA, and John E. Verna, in his own right, and Joyce Verna, Parent of John E. Verna v. U.S. SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION and Simpson Marine Safety Equipment, Inc., Debtor in Possession d/b/a Simpson Sports. Civ. A. No. 88-0736. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 18, 1989.<

720 F.Supp. 284 (1989) MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION OF UNITED STATES, INC. and Automobile Importers of America, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Robert ABRAMS, Attorney General of the State of New York, Defendant. No. 86 CIV 9592 (LBS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 16, 1989. *285

OPINION SAND, District Judge. Presently before the Court is the one issue that remains in this action: Whether the provision of the New York Lemon Law that effectively requires automobile manufacturers to offer basic warranties of two years or 18,000 miles (whichever comes first) violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. BACKGROUND The plaintif

577 F.2d 1256 Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,433, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,529GREAT WESTERN UNITED CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Wayne L. KIDWELL, Attorney General of Idaho, Defendant,Tom D. McEldowney, Director of the Department of Finance ofthe State of Idaho, Defendant-Appellant. No. 77-2809. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug. 10, 1978.<

483 S.E.2d 265 (1996) 199 W.Va. 136 Joy F. KING and David L. King, her husband, and David L. King, natural parent and next friend of Shannon King, an infant, Plaintiffs, Petitioners, v. LENS CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a West Virginia Limited Partnership; Long Management Company, a West Virginia Corporation; Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., a Corporation; Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc., a Corporation; and Bud Young To

ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS CRAIG B. SHAFFER, United States Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the court on (1) Defendant Mountain Man, Inc.’s (“Mountain Man”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Claims for Relief (doc. # 58), filed on January 14, 2011; (2) Defendant Mountain Man, Ine.’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs Expert Testimony Pursuant to F.R.E. 702 (doc.

[Cite as Fagen v. Jaguar Land Rover N. Am., L.L.C., 2023-Ohio-4324.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO DEBORAH FAGEN, : APPEAL NOS. C-220640 C-220656 Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross- TRIAL NO. A-2001080 Appellee,

JUSTICE BURKE delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. ¶ 1 The plaintiff, Aspen American Insurance Company, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County in which it alleged that the roof of a Michigan warehouse owned by the defendant, Interstate Warehousing, Inc., had collapsed, causing the destruction of goods owned by plaintiff's insured, Eastern Fish Company. Defe