⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Shabazz v. Nagle”

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024-04-18 · Published · cited 0×
Mahdi Shabazz v. State of Maryland Department of Public Safety, et al., No. 1989 September Term, 2022. Opinion by Wright, Alexander, Jr. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – EX POST FACTO PROHIBITIONS – PARTICULAR ISSUES AND APPLICATIONS – SEX OFFENDERS – REGISTRATION Trial court did not err in finding that the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (the “Department”) and two of its employees (collectively “Appellees”) had not violated § 11-701, et seq. of the Criminal Procedure Articl
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-12-11 · Published · cited 159× · 910 F.3d 639
Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to consider the application of the Rooker - Feldman doctrine where plaintiffs complain of injuries flowing from settlement agreements that were "so-ordered" by state-court judges. Plaintiffs-Appellants Sung Cho, Nagle Washrite LLC (Cho's business entity), David Diaz, and Jameelah El
District Court, N.D. New York · 2018-03-22 · Published · cited 31× · 293 F. Supp. 3d 282
GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief United States District Judge Currently pending before the Court, in this civil rights action filed by Adrian Thomas ("Plaintiff") against the City of Troy, Adam R. Mason, Ronald Fountain, and Tim Colaneri (collectively "City Defendants"), and the County of Rensselaer and Michael Sikirica ("Dr. Sikirica") (collectively "County Defendants"), are the following three motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006-10-05 · Published · cited 3× · 454 F. Supp. 2d 278; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72688; 2006 WL 2827859
454 F.Supp.2d 278 (2006) UNITED STATES v. Tyrone MARTIN. Criminal Action No. 00-710. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 5, 2006. *279 *280 Joseph G. Poluka, U.S. Attorneys, Phila, PA, for United States. MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge
Iqbal v. Hastypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007-06-18 · Published · cited 614× · 490 F.3d 143
05-5768-cv (L) Iqbal v. Hasty UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2006 Heard: October 4, 2006 Decided: June 14, 2007 Docket Nos. 05-5768-cv (L), 05-5844-cv (con), 05-6379-cv (con), 05-6352-cv (con), 05-6386-cv (con), 05-6358-cv (con), 05-6388-cv (con) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JAVAID IQBAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1985-01-31 · Published · cited 0× · 601 F. Supp. 885; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22963
MEMORANDUM CALDWELL, District Judge. Plaintiff, Carl A. Maulfair, alleges in his complaint that the defendant, The United States of America, negligently failed to diagnose from routine annual chest x-rays taken as part of plaintiffs employment with the Veterans Administration a cancerous tumor in his left lung. He asserts he has been forced to undergo medical treatment he would not have had if the tumor had
Iqbal v. Hastypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007-06-14 · Published · cited 444× · 490 F.3d 143; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13911
490 F.3d 143 Javaid IQBAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Dennis HASTY, former Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center, Michael Cooksey, former Assistant Director for Correctional Programs of the Bureau of Prisons, John Ashcroft, former Attorney General of the United States, Robert Mueller, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, David Rardin, former Director of the Northeast Region of the Bureau of Prisons, Michael Rolince, former Chief
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989-01-31 · Published · cited 49× · 866 F.2d 1450; 275 U.S. App. D.C. 332; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 700; 1989 WL 5974
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STARR. STARR, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court rejecting an equal protection challenge to certain prison policies of the District of Columbia, 684 F.Supp. 303. The District has for many years relied upon the facilities of the federal Bureau of Prisons for