Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CP-01270-COA SHARON A. EDWARDS APPELLANT v. JANET A. WILLIAMS AND LAURIE PANNELL APPELLEES DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/11/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. C. MICHAEL MALSKI COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: UNION COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit Elaine Slobod, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Orange County, from enforcing a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated November 9, 2016, in an underlying action to foreclose a mortgage pending in that court. Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or

ROBINSON, J. ¶ 1. Petitioner challenges a Human Services Board decision that affirmed an adoption-assistance subsidy calculated by the Department for Children and Families (DCF) for petitioner's adopted son once he turned eighteen. We affirm. ¶ 2. The facts are not substantially disputed. Petitioner and her spouse adopted their son through DCF in 2003. As part of t

75 Cal.Rptr.3d 458 (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 136 Sharon R. EDWARDS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Oscar L. EDWARDS, Defendant and Appellant. No. B191035. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three. April 22, 2008. *459 Anita Grace Edwards, Long Beach, for Defendant and Appellant. Cou

ORDER Per Curiam: Mr. James Freel Edwards, his wife, Ms. Erma K. Edwards, and their daughter, Ms. Sherry Jo Edwards, appeal a judgment enforcing a settlement that creates perpetual easements and imposes other mutual obligations on the parties to this property-access dispute. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b).</

ELMORE, Judge. Plaintiff WLAE, LLC, appeals from two dismissal orders, one each of which was entered in favor of defendants Robert L. Edwards and Wolf Arbin Weinhold, and both of which were entered pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Because plaintiff lacked standing at the time its complaint was filed, the trial court correctly determined that it d

FAIR, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Sharon and Herbert Lee filed a "Verified Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Injunctive Relief, Damages and Other Relief, Including Declaring Invalid Zoning Ordinance ...," contending, among other things, they had not received the required notice that the City of Byram intended to consider rezoning certain property located near their home. The Lees' complaint

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. By decision and order on motion dated April 4, 2011, this Court granted that branch of the motion of the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) which was to direct that the resignor, Swindley Anderson Edwards, be examined by a qualified medical expert to determine whether he is incapacitated from c

In re James, Latanya; Knight, Shan-nell; —Plaintiff(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, First City Court of New Orleans, No. 10-51228; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2010-C-1474. Denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant. KNOLL, J., concurs in the denial. The result is correct.

GREGORY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The Court adheres today to a rigidly formalistic view of the Due Process Clause that provides no real protection for the well-established liberty interest Virginia inmates have in parole consideration. For this reason, I respectfully dissent. I. The majority and I are in agreement on several points. There is no independent due process rig

PUBLISHED Filed: November 15, 2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT SHARON BURNETTE; PAMELA K.  BURROUGHS; FRANK CARTER, JR.; EDWARD CONQUEST; DONALD W. HOFFMAN; MONTY KING, formerly known as Imond Monty Hicks; LARRY MACON; MARVIN MCCLAIN; BENJAMIN PERDUE, JR.; HENRY STUMP; BARBARA TABOR, Suing on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appella

525 F.Supp.2d 710 (2007) Cecelia EDWARDS v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security. Civil Action No. 06-5520. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. September 17, 2007. *711 Sharon Gornstein, Leventhal Sutton & Gornstein, Trevose, PA, for Cecilia Edwards. MEMORANDUM LOWELL

OPINION GILDEA, Chief Justice. This case presents a question the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota certified to us. We are asked to decide whether “the 2013 amendment to the Minnesota Whistleblower Act defining the term ‘good faith’ to mean ‘conduct that does not violate section 181.932, subdivision 3’ eliminate[s] the judicially created requirement that the putative whistleblower

FILED 1 ORDERED PUBLISHED FEB 17 2012 SUSAN M SPRAUL, CLERK 2 U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL O F TH E N IN TH C IR C U IT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE NINTH CI

In February 1994, Ronald Walter Edwards (the "father") and Sharon K. Edwards (the "mother") were divorced in Pike County, Alabama. The parties agreed that the mother should have custody of the parties' two minor sons, subject to the father's visitation rights. The trial court incorporated the parties' agreement into the divorce judgment. In June 1997, the father filed a petition to modify, alleging that a material change in circumstances had occurred that warranted a change in

OPINION RIPPLE, Senior Circuit Judge: David and Sharon Welsh filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana. The Trustee objected to the Welshes’ proposed plan on the ground that it was not proposed in good faith. The bankruptcy court overruled the objection, and the Trustee appealed to the Bankrupt

396 F.3d 1168 Frank TAUCHER, et al., Appelleesv.Sharon BROWN-HRUSKA, Acting CFTC Chairman, et al., Appellants No. 04-5026. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued October 8, 2004. Decided January 28, 2005. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dis

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 15, 2009 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 15, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals</

559 S.E.2d 506 (2002) 253 Ga. App. 479 EDWARDS v. The STATE. No. A02A0459. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 25, 2002. *507 Joshua D. Earwood, Cartersville, for appellant. T. Joseph Campbell, Dist. Atty., Cartersville, Sharon M. Fox, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. PHIPPS, Judge. R

118 Cal.Rptr.2d 256 (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 161 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Thomas Ellis EDWARDS, Defendant and Appellant. No. G026878. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three. March 27, 2002. Review Denied June 19, 2002. *257 Sharon M. Jones, Ventura, under appointment