Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Rule 12 Motions to Dismiss (doc. 19), filed January 1, 2011. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds the Motions should be and hereby are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. *585I. BACKGROUND

07-17-00458CV ACCEPTED SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 3/23/2018 4:00 PM Vivian Long, Clerk APPELLATE NO. 07-17-00458-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 7th COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTAMARILLO, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM & ORDÉR ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: Defendant First Unum Life Insurance Company (“Unum”) denied plaintiffs claim for long-term disability benefits. She then sued under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., asking for a declaration that she is entitled to disability coverage and back payments from the date o

367 B.R. 207 (2007) In re NATIONAL AUDIT DEFENSE NETWORK, Debtor. William A. Leonard, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Weston J. Coolidge; WJC Enterprises, Inc.; Bridgeway Corp.; and Pacific Northwest, Inc., Defendants. William A. Leonard, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Weston J. Coolidge; WJC Enterprises, Inc.; Bridgeway Corp.; and Pacific Northwest, Inc., Defendants. William A. Leonard, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee, Pl

535 F.Supp.2d 676 (2007) Grant THORNTON, LLP, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant; and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Grant Thornton, LLP, Defendant; and Gary Ellis, Plaintiff, v. Grant Thornton, LLP, Defendant. Civil Action Nos. 1:00-0655, 1:03-2129, 1:04-0043. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia.

OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: On July 24, 2012, Plaintiff William Wedge commenced this litigation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1191c, 1202-1242, 1301-1461, against Defendants Shawmut Design and Construction Group Long Term Disability *324Insurance Plan (

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED Fall 2024 Term December 27, 2024 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK

289 S.E.2d 692 (1982) John C. HARLESS, Appellee, v. FIRST NAT'L BANK IN FAIRMONT, etc., Appellant and Aubrey B. Wilson, Defendant. John C. HARLESS, Appellee, v. FIRST NAT'L BANK IN FAIRMONT, etc., Appellee and Aubrey B. Wilson, Appellant. John C. HARLESS, Appellant, v. FIRST NAT'L BANK IN FAIRMONT, etc., Appellee and Aubrey B. Wilson, Appellee. Nos. 15088-15090. Supr

394 F.3d 296 Mark NEWBY, et al., Plaintiffs,Mark Newby, The Regents of the University of California, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.ENRON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.Andersen-United Kingdom, Andersen-Brazil, Arthur Andersen & Company India, Andersen Worldwide SC, Defendants-Appellees,v.Rinis Travel Service Inc. Profit Sharing Trust UA 6-1-1989, Michael J. Rinis, IRRA, Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants,Settlement Class Mem

308 F.Supp. 1274 (1969) Leola Pearl BECKETT et al., Plaintiffs, and Carlotta Mozelle Brewer et al., and United States of America, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF the CITY OF NORFOLK et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 2214. United States District Court E. D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. December 30, 1969. *1275

596 F.2d 1249 19 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1682,20 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,001Wesley P. BERNARD et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.GULF OIL COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 77-1502. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. June 15, 1979. Stella M. Morrison, Port Arthur, Tex., Ulysses Gene Thibodeau

334 F.2d 906 Martin X. SOSTRE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Paul D. McGINNIS, Commissioner of Correction of the State ofNew York, andWalter H. Wilkins, Warden of AtticaState Prison, Attica, New York, et al.,Defendants-Appellees.William SaMARION and Thomas L. Bratcher, on Behalf ofThemselves and AllOthers Similarly Situated,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Paul D. McGINNIS, Commissioner of Correction of the State ofNew Yo

608 F.3d 698 (2010) Stacy PRICE; Chad James, individually and as parents and next friend, for the minor child, K.J., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Dale E. WOLFORD, D.O., Defendant-Appellee, Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Defendant-Intervener-Appellant. No. 09-6139. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 17, 2010. *700

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2021 Term FILED _______________ June 1, 2021 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK No. 19-1077 SUPREME COU

HUMPHREY, J. [¶ 1] James N. Levis appeals from a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Wiscasset, Billings, J.) in favor of Gustav Konitzky in this adverse possession and quiet title action. Levis asserts several errors and abuses of discretion by the trial court over the course of the six years that this litigation was pending, including, inter alia,

633 F.Supp.2d 287 (2009) AHF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF DALLAS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-1035-D. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. June 11, 2009. *289 John Ben Blanchard, J. Daren Brown, Shawn D. Twing, Sprouse Shrader Smith, Amarillo, TX, Mitchell Murphy, K&

WINCHESTER, J., dissenting: ¶ 1 I respectfully dissent. It is important to point out what 23 O.S.2011, § 61.2 does not do: (1) it does not cap damages in cases of wrongful death; (2) it does not cap economic damages for lost wages; (3) it does not cap economic damages for medical expenses; and (4) it does not bar the first $350,000 of non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. With the passage of § 61.2, the Legislature dete

SMITH, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns a variety of securities class actions stemming from the downfall of Enron Corporation. These actions have similar substantive claims, but they differ with respect to the definition of the putative class. Appellants, a subset of members of the putative class in Newby v. Enron Corp., No. H-01-CV-3624 (S.D.Tex.), timely

OPINION BILL MEIER, Justice. I.INTRODUCTION Appellant and Cross-Appellee H.E.B., L.L.C. appeals the final judgment awarding Appellee and Cross-Appellant Horace T. Ardinger, Jr. $1,300,405.04. Ardinger appeals the trial court’s denial of his requests for declaratory relief and for attorneys’ fees. We will affirm the trial court’s j

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge. David Phillips appeals his criminal conviction for violating the Clean Water Act1 (“CWA”) and conspiring to violate the CWA. We disposed of many of Phillips’ claims in a separate memorandum disposition. In this opinion, we reject Phillips’ remaining claim: that the district court erred in refusing to dismiss the indictment for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that