Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Seth v. Piper”
Seth Grimes v. Amber Dawn Dikepublic domain
MARY'S OPINION HEADING NO. 12-05-00386-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
SETH, Chief Judge. This appeal presents the question as to whether a federal court in a diversity suit may exercise pendent party jurisdiction over plaintiff’s $7,000.00- claims against each of several defendants as to whom no independent basis of federal jurisdiction exists. Plaintiff, National Insurance Underwriters, had issued a policy of hull insurance on a Piper airplane which suffered damage in the
Cook v. Piperpublic domain
Mr. Justice Horton delivered the opinion of the court. In the early part of August, 1892, the plaintiff in error, then a child ten years of age, was injured on South Paulina street, in this city, by a cake of' ice which fell upon her from the rear end of an ice wagon belonging to defendants in error. She had just run across the street diagonally, to the rear of
595 F.2d 546 71 A.L.R.Fed. 108 NATIONAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, Appellee,v.PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Aetna Life & Casualty Company,United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc., ThomasCunningham, and James V. Phelps, Appellants. Nos. 77-1506, 77-1507. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 16
Griffin & Connelly v. Piperpublic domain
Mr. Justice Gary delivered the opinion of the Court. Two cases were commenced in the Circuit Court, in one of which John Griffin and Francis W. Connelly, composing the firm of Griffin & Connelly, were plaintiffs, and in the other William Esch, Frederick Esch, August Esch and Frederick L. Rabe, composing the firm of Esch Bros. & Rabe, were plaintiffs, and in both Seth
224 F.3d 797 (6th Cir. 2000) John D. McLean, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lisa Irene Jiggens, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.988011 Ontario, Ltd., d/b/a Plane Perfection; William Allen Ball Enterprises, Ltd., d/b/a B&B Aircraft, Defendants-Appellees.Alberta M. Jiggens and David Buckner, as Personal Co-Representatives of Brian E. Jiggens, deceased, and Kaleb Jiggens, a minor, deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Pip
388 F.2d 806 CHAMPION HOME BUILDERS and Roger L. Hickman, Appellants,v.Leona J. SHUMATE, Appellee.CHAMPION HOME BUILDERS and Roger L. Hickman, Appellants,v.Susan Gail SHUMATE, etc., Appellee.CHAMPION HOME BUILDERS and Roger L. Hickman, Appellants,v.Michael G. PIPER, etc., Appellee. Nos. 8895-8897. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
State v. Mizepublic domain
PIPER, J. *267{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Seth Mize, appeals his sentence in the Butler County Court of Common Pleas. I. Procedural Posture {¶ 2} In 2008, Mize pled guilty to two separate counts of robbery. The trial court sentenced Mize to seven years in prison on one count of robbery and five ye
Casey v. Odwalla, Inc.public domain
NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Tara Casey ("Plaintiff"), instituted this putative class action by filing a federal complaint on March 24, 2017, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. (See Compl. (ECF No. 1).) Plaintiff asserts that defendants Odwalla, Inc. ("Odwalla") and The Coca-Cola Company ("Coca-Cola") (collectively, "Defendants") violated the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1983 (t
State v. Mirandapublic domain
Lanzinger, J., concurring in judgment. {¶ 21} I would hold simply that because a RICO offense and its underlying predicate offenses are offenses of dissimilar import, they do not merge. R.C. 2941.25(B) states: Where the defendant’s conduct constitutes two or more offenses of dissimilar import, or where his conduct results
State v. Kettererpublic domain
Lundberg Stratton, J., dissenting. {¶ 82} The majority holds that the trial court failed to properly impose postrelease control and, therefore, that the case must be remanded so that *465Ketterer may be given the proper terms of postrelease control pursuant to R.C. 2929.191. I dissent.
In re Estate of Alden v. Alden v. Aldenpublic domain
Skoglund, J. ¶ 1. This case stems from a dispute over the 1973 William C. Alden Trust (the Trust) benefitting grantor’s second wife Nancy Alden, his two children by Nancy, and his three children from his first marriage. Todd Alden and Julia Alden Dee, two of grantor’s children by his first marriage, allege that Nancy, in her capacity as trustee, acted fraudulently and in violation of
United States v. Barnespublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER LORETTA A PRESKA, Chief Judge: Tuere Barnes (“Barnes” or “Defendant”) moves for a new trial pursuant to Fed. *458R.Crim.P. 33. In 2009, a jury convicted Barnes of seven offenses involving racketeering, narcotics distribution, kidnapping, conspiracy to murder, and use of a firearm. Three years later he filed the ins
The opinion of the court was delivered by AXELRAD, P.J.A.D. In these consolidated appeals, we decide whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C.A § 1001 to - 1461, preempts a medical provider’s claims against the ERISA benefit plan for payment of the provider’s customary fees for the services it rendered to patients rather than the discounted fees the plan would have bee
Jenkins Starr, LLC v. Continental Ins. Co., Inc.public domain
601 F.Supp.2d 344 (2009) JENKINS STARR, LLC and Ruth Jenkins, Plaintiffs, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-11757-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 26, 2009. Donald P. Nagle, Law Office of Donald P. Nagle, P.C., Plymouth, MA, for Plaintiff. Michael F. Aylward Morrison, Jennifer A. Brennan, Kathl
Ergo Licensing LLP v. Carefusion 303, Inc.public domain
744 F.Supp.2d 381 (2010) ERGO LICENSING LLP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CAREFUSION 303, INC., Defendant. CareFusion 303, Inc., Counterclaimant, v. Ergo Licensing LLP, Counterdefendant. No. 2:08-cv-259-GZS. United States District Court, D. Maine. December 28, 2010. *383 James G. Goggin, Seth W. Brewster, Elizabeth M. Frank
Shiftan v. Morgan Joseph Holdings, Inc.public domain
OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction Defendant Morgan Joseph Holdings, Inc. is an investment bank in which the petitioners held Series A Preferred Stock. The petitioners bought their preferred stock when Morgan Joseph was founded in 2001, helping to provide the initial funding for the company. Until late 2010, Morgan Joseph had outstanding two classes of preferred stock (Se
Vigilant Insurance v. Bear Stearns Companiespublic domain
10 N.Y.3d 170 (2008) 884 N.E.2d 1044 855 N.Y.S.2d 45 VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES, INC., Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued February 6, 2008. Decided March 13, 2008. *171 DLA Piper US LLP, New York Cit
United States v. Singhalpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Oh May 10, 2011, a grand jury returned a ten-count Indictment against defendants Shelly S. Singhal, Loretta Fredy Bush, and Dennis L. Pelino. The Indictment alleges that defendants engaged in a conspiracy and scheme to defraud the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), inv
Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc.public domain
O'Malley, Circuit Judge. *1309 Cellspin Soft, Inc. ("Cellspin") sued Fitbit, Inc. ("Fitbit"), Moov, Inc. ("Moov"), Nike, Inc. ("Nike"), Fossil Group, Inc. and Misfit, Inc. ("Fossil"), Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin U.S.A., Inc. ("Garmin"), Canon U.S.A., Inc. ("Canon"), GoPro, Inc