Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sergio Cabrera”
United States v. Sergio Jesus Guerra-Cabrera, United States of America v. Nazario Espinoza-Cabrerapublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Sergio Jesus Guerra-Cabrera and Naza-rio Espinoza-Cabrera 2 each pled guilty to one count of conspiring to distribute cocaine and cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A). The district court 3 imposed mandatory minim
16:9 Cinema LLC v. Sergio F. Brokpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 2, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1888 Lower Tribunal No. 21-13084 ________________ 16:9 Cinema LLC, Appellant,
Sergio Meza v. Merrick B. Garlandpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2193 SERGIO MEZA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ On Petition for Review o
Vicente v. Prudential Insurance Co. of Americapublic domain
SALMON, Judge. On December 14, 1993, the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (Ryan, J.) dismissed, without prejudice, the third amended complaint filed by Carlos Vicente and his father, Jose Vicente, against The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) and Sergio M. Cabreras, Prudential’s agent. The Vicentes raise two issues on appeal, which we have rephrased for clarity: 1. Whether the
In Re Cabrera-Mejiapublic domain
402 B.R. 335 (2008) In re Fernando CABRERA-MEJIA, et al., Debtors. No. LA08-13505SB. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California. December 23, 2008. *339 James T. King, King & Associates, Glendale, CA, for Debtors. OPINION ON SANCTIONS SAMUEL L. BUFFORD, Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction
United States v. S. Guerra-Cabrerapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-2826 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff/Appellee, * * v. * * Sergio Jesus Guerra-Cabrera, * *
Opinion issued June 23, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00423-CV ——————————— IN RE 8650 FRISCO, LLC D/B/A ESTILO GAUCHO BRAZILIAN STEAKHOUSE, MANDONA, LLC, GALOVELHO, LLC, BAHTCHE, LLC, CLAUDIO NUNES, AND DAVID JEIEL RODRIGUES, Relators
Rodriguez-Lehmann v. Condepublic domain
PER CURIAM. It is undisputed that appellants, defendants below, did not receive notice of the motion for summary judgment or proceedings thereon. The motion for relief from judgment should have been granted pursuant to Rule 1.540(b)(4), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Falkner v. AmeriFirst Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 489 So.2d 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The final judgment is therefore vacated and the cause remanded
NUMBER 13-05-578-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRIST
Sanchez v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner Sergio Sanchez, native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) upholding the immigration judge’s decision to deny his application for cancellation of removal and the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen proceedings and the BIA’s order. To the extent we have jurisdiction it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discret
Claudio Navarro v. Alfredo L. Borgespublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 3, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-0175 Lower Tribunal No. 18-40312 ________________ Claudio Navarro, et al., Appellants,
United States v. Saldanapublic domain
MEMORANDUM** Sergio Saldana appeals his jury conviction and consequent 24-month sentence imposed for importing two kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960, and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. Saldana contends that the district court erred by exc
Cedeño Nieves v. Aerostar Airport Holdings LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge Maribel Cedefio Nieves (“Plaintiff’) invokes this Court’s diversity jurisdiction to bring a negligence suit against Aerostar Airport Holdings LLC and Aerostar’s insurance company, AIG Insurance Company-Puerto Rico, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). (Docket No, 27.) Plaintiff alleges that she fell while stepping onto an electric escalator in
United States v. Gabriel Guerreropublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a criminal conviction challenging the admission into evidence of testimony that the defendant had threatened a witness in order to induce him not to testify against the defendant at trial. The defendant challenges the district court’s admissio
ACCEPTED 01-15-00423-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/28/2015 6:07:52 PM
ACCEPTED 01-15-00423-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/12/2015 11:14:29 AM
People v. Gonzalespublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 622 OPINION Defendant Sergio Javier Vasquez Gonzales was found guilty by a jury of two counts of robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.)1 The jury found true the special allegation that defendant persona
Smith v. McClier Corp.public domain
*370Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered May 25, 2004, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted those branches of defendants’ motion and cross motions for summary judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiffs Labor Law § 241 (6) claim, and denied so much of the cross motion of defendant Hirani Engineering and Land Surveying, EC. as sought dismissal
LANDRAU v. Betancourtpublic domain
(2007) Sonia M. LANDRAU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jose E. Solis BETANCOURT, et al., Defendants. Sonia M. Landrau, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jose E. Solis Betancourt, et al., Defendants. Civil Nos. 05-2185 (FAB), 06-1773 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 27, 2007. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. On M
Landrau v. Solis-Betancourtpublic domain
(2008) Sonia M. LANDRAU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jose E. SOLIS-BETANCOURT, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-1773(FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 19, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, District Judge. I. Procedural History On December 28, 2007, defendant Jose E. Solis-Betancourt ("Solis") filed