Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Sergio Raya-Baez, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals the district court’s judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a), and we review de novo. Angulo-Dominguez v. Ashcroft, 290 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm. Raya-Baez challenges the decision of the

Perez v Baez (2020 NY Slip Op 04329) Perez v Baez 2020 NY Slip Op 04329 Decided on July 29, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 31, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D21-929, 3D21-1001 Lower Tribunal No. 17-25120 ________________ VME Group International, LLC, etc., et al., Appel

SUPERIOR COURT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS v. JERRELL GREENE-MARTIN Docket: 2284CR00723 Dates: February 6, 2024 Present:

527 F.3d 891 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto Baez RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonel Mendoza, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rigoberto Baez Rivera, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alice Espinoza, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 06-30474,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 22-1706 22-1715 EDGAR A. REYES-COLÓN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO and POPULAR AUTO, INC., Defendants, Appellees. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jay A. García-Gregory, U.S. Di

991 So.2d 912 (2008) BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC, Appellant, v. Hortensia Palmira GARCIA, as personal representative of the Estate of Antonio Sanchez Rodriguez and on behalf of all his survivors including Sergio Ruben Sanchez, Christian Marcelo Sanchez, Jose Osvaldo Sanchez Garcia, and the minor Rodrigo Antonio Sanchez Baez, represented by his mother Mirta Susana Baez, and Carlos Dario Santiso, individually and as personal repr

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

PROST, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Salma Acevedo et al. (“Appellants”) allege that the United States violated 5 U.S.C. § 5928 by refusing to provide them with danger pay allowances. The Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) held that it lacked jurisdiction over the case because § 5928 and its implementing regulations are not money-mandating, as requ

650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 06-30474 v.  D.C. No. GILBERTO BAEZ RIVERA, CR-05-02075-EFS Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 06-30483

El Juez Presidente Señor Trías Monge emitió la opinión del Tribunal. En Soto v. Srio. de Justicia, 112 D.P.R. 477 (1982), con-sideramos aspectos de la libertad ciudadana de información frente a la Rama Ejecutiva. Este caso plantea una cuestión distinta, nueva en esta jurisdicción: el alcance del poder de investigación de una comisión legislativa frente a una agen-cia ejecutiva del Gobierno.

392 F.Supp.2d 167 (2005) Manuel SANCHEZ RAMOS, Plaintiff, v. PUERTO RICO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.03-2043 DRD. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 20, 2005. *168 *169 *170 *171 C

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

Mr. Justice Santana Becerra, with whom Mr. Justice Hernández Matos concurs, dissenting. San Juan, Puerto Rico, January 26, 1970 This opinion was originally circulated as the opinion of the Court. As it did not obtain the votes of a majority, I issue it now as a dissenting opinion with some final observations. —I— We issued this petition for certiorari

Opinión disidente emitida por el Juez Asociado Señor Santana Becerra, en la cual concurre el Juez Asociado Señor Hernández Matos. San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 26 de enero de 1970 Esta Opinión fue originalmente circulada como dicta-men del Tribunal. Al no obtener los votos de una mayoría, la emito ahora como criterio disidente, con algunas observa-ciones finales.

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under