Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RALPH COLEMAN; PETER No. 24-4023 COCKCROFT; ERNESTO D.C. No. VENEGAS; JULIO GARZA, 2:90-cv-00520- KJM-DB Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. OPINION GAVIN NEWSOM; JEFF MACOMBER; JOE STEPHENSHAW;

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAJOR THOMAS G. COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-1822 (JDB) FRANK KENDALL, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Major Thomas G. Coleman was separated from the Air Force in 2013. Following his separation, Coleman filed an application

Romeka v. RadAmerica II, LLC, ET AL., No. 1207, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Eyler, Deborah S., J. MARYLAND HEALTH CARE WORKER WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT (HCWWPA OR ACT), HEALTH OCCUPATIONS ARTICLE §§ 1-502 THROUGH 1-506 --- ACTION FOR VIOLATION OF HCWWPA --- PROOF OF CAUSATION --- McDONNELL DOUGLAS EVIDENTIARY FRAMEWORK --- SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Ms. Romeka worked as a chief radiation therapist for RadAmerica, which supplied radiation treatment health care workers to a hospital’s radi

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Teresa Coleman is 53 years old, illiterate, and suffers from mental health problems. She may even be mentally retarded.1 *801For more than a decade, Coleman received Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") benefits, but those were terminated

Bridget Romeka v. RadAmerica II, LLC, et al., No. 16, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Gould, J. HEALTH CARE WORKER WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT – CAUSATION The Supreme Court of Maryland held that to prevail under the Health Care Worker Whistleblower Protection Act, a plaintiff (1) must prove that but for the protected disclosure, the employer would not have taken the adverse personnel action, and (2) may establish but-for causation through the analytical framework established in McDonnell Dou

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1591 Doc: 45 Filed: 07/26/2023 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1591 BLAIR COLEMAN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FRANK KENDALL, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendant – Appellee

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Houser and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Houser and enters the following Opinion and Award: <

MOORE, J. *480Donna Butler-Bowie appeals a judgment that sustained a declinatory exception of prematurity and a peremptory exception of prescription, and a later judgment that sustained a peremptory exception of no cause of action, fully dismissing her claims against Olive Branch Senior Care Center for a patient's wrongful death and for her own

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4093 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DEVON SCOTT COLEMAN, a/k/a Cuz, a/k/a Devin Scott Coleman, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge

OPINION & ORDER KAREN K. CALDWELL, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on a motion by the three plaintiff corporations to compel arbitration and enjoin the defendant from pursuing her parallel suit in state court. (DE 7). Defendant Teresa Stacy, administratrix of the Estate of Anna Stacy, objects to the motion and has filed her own motion to dismiss. (DE 5). She contends that this C

MOORE, J. *480Donna Butler-Bowie appeals a judgment that sustained a declinatory exception of prematurity and a peremptory exception of prescription, and a later judgment that sustained a peremptory exception of no cause of action, fully dismissing her claims against Olive Branch Senior Care Center for a patient's wrongful death and for her own

02/05/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 3, 2023 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BOBBY MARABLE II Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County No. 19568 Clayburn L. Peeples, Judge No. W2022-01591-CCA-R3-CD The Def

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DARRIN LENALD COOPER, No. 24-1084 BAP No. Appellant, 1:23-bk-1098 v. OPINION SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Appellee. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior-District Judge. This is a habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner Richard Enyart seeks relief from his Ohio convictions for rape, gross sexual imposition, illegal use of minors in nudity-oriented material, and pandering sexually-oriented material to minors. Pending is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐2267 BOGUSTAWA FREY, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. HOTEL COLEMAN, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________

ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. In ongoing sequelae to defendants’ January 7; 2013 motion to terminate this action (hereafter “termination motion”) (ECF No. 4275), two additional motions brought by plaintiffs for enforcement of court orders and affirmative relief are before the court.1 On May 9, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion related to housing and treat<

OPINION ACREE, Chief Judge: The narrow issue presented is whether either, or both, of the appellants, Dexter Coleman and Mark Cantrell, is entitled to qualified official immunity. We find Cantrell engaged in a discretionary act and, as a result, may qualify for official immunity. With respect to Coleman, we find he failed to comply with a ministerial directive but, because a genuine issue of ma

Rovner, Circuit Judge. Before we can attend to any other issues in an employment discrimination case, we must first determine who, in fact, employed the plaintiff. This question, which seems as though it ought to be simple on its face, continues to confound litigants and courts. This case presents issues regarding the employer/employee relationship that arise in the not-so-uncommon scen

OPINION AND ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO IMPLEMENT AMENDED PLAN STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge, THELTON E. HENDERSON, Senior District Judge. On April 11, 2013, this Court issued an opinion and order denying defendants’ motion to vacate or modify our population reduction order. Apr. 11, 2013 Op. & Order Denying Defs.’ Mot. to Vacate or Modify Popu

ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHARON L. GLEASON, District Judge. This is an action for employment discrimination that George Coleman initiated in January 2011. Defendant Patrick R. Donahoe has moved for summary judgment on all claims that Mr. Coleman has brought against him.1 The motion has been fully briefed by the parties2