Cases

Beckwith, Associate Judge: *312 Phone Recovery Services (PRS) appeals the dismissal of a lawsuit it brought on behalf of the District of Columbia against various telecommunications providers alleged to have fraudulently underpaid taxes that the District requires such providers to charge thei

RULING ON MOTION TO STRIKE, MOTION TO INTERVENE, and MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge. Peter Wiberg, Alan Gouse, and Christopher Anderson as trustees of employer-sponsored, profit-sharing retirement plans (collectively, the “Trustees”), move for class certification of their claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 11

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales, Huff, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, Athey, Fulton, PUBLISHED Ortiz, Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins, White and Frucci Argued at Richmond, Virginia MAZIE GREEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 0144-22-3

Selective Way Insurance Company v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company, et al., No. 755, Sept. Term 2018. Opinion by Arthur, J. LIABILITY INSURANCE—DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF DUTY TO DEFEND A liability insurer for a subcontractor has a duty to defend a suit against a general contractor where: the policy makes the general contractor an additional insured with respect to claims arising out of or caused by the subcontractor’s work for the general contractor; and the allegations in the

Selective Way Insurance Company v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company, et al., No. 755, Sept. Term 2018. Opinion by Arthur, J. LIABILITY INSURANCE—DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF DUTY TO DEFEND A liability insurer for a subcontractor has a duty to defend a suit against a general contractor where: the policy makes the general contractor an additional insured with respect to claims arising out of or caused by the subcontractor’s work for the general contractor; and the allegations in the

Selective Way Insurance Company v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company, et al., No. 755, Sept. Term 2018. Opinion by Arthur, J. LIABILITY INSURANCE—DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF DUTY TO DEFEND A liability insurer for a subcontractor has a duty to defend a suit against a general contractor where: the policy makes the general contractor an additional insured with respect to claims arising out of or caused by the subcontractor’s work for the general contractor; and the allegations in the

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-985 C Filed: November 30, 2018* **************************************** * 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) (Scope of * Review); PARTNER 4 RECOVERY, * 28 U.S.C. § 1491(Tucker Act * Jurisdict

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division NATIONWIDE TRANSFER LLC, ) D/B/A NATIONWIDE SETTLEMENT ) SOLUTIONS, and ) YOUR TIME SHARE STOPS HERE, LLC, ) D/B/A AMERICAN SETTLEMENT ) SERVICES, ) ) Appellants, ) )

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-985 C Filed: November 30, 2018* **************************************** * 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) (Scope of * Review); PARTNER 4 RECOVERY, * 28 U.S.C. § 1491(Tucker Act * Jurisdict

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on Count I of Plaintiffs complaint, which alleges violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. See [75] and [89]. For the reasons explained below, the Court grants in part and denies in part

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, Senior Judge. I. BACKGROUND... 148 A Factual Background and Procedural History.. .148 B. The Proposed Class Action Settlement. . .149 1. The Proposed Settlement Class... 149 *1482.The Proposed Settlement Terms... 150 II. DISC

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. This Memorandum Opinion addresses: (1)Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Defendants Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide General Insurance Company, Eric C. Hitzel, Andrew B. Greenspan, and the Law Offices of Andrew B. Greenspan, ECF No. 7, and supporting Memorandum (“

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This matter is before the Court upon the Motion of Defendants Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Insurance Company of America for Summary Judgment ("Nationwide's Motion for Summary Judgment") (Doc. 79). The motion is fully briefed and ripe for disposition. For the following reasons, Nationwide's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and

McDONALD, J. This declaratory judgment action concerns whether an insurer is obligated to indemnify a business owner under a personal insurance policy for liability arising from his false imprisonment of his company's employee at her workplace and the evidentiary basis on which such a determination is to be made. In this certified appeal, the defendant Jeffrey S. Pasiak

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION WOLFSON, United States District Judge: This matter arises out of a Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Alma and Gregory Rush (collectively, “Plaintiffs’”), alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., as well as a state law claim for invasion of privacy. Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Defendant” or “Portfolio”) filed a motion fo

ACCEPTED 04-14-00569-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 3/17/2015 7:29:49 PM

CARL J. BARBIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are a Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 106) filed by SE Property Holdings, LLC ("SEPH"), and a Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 110) filed by the United States of America (the "IRS"). These are cross motions for summary judgment and, as is often the case, many of the arguments made therein are duplicative w

821 F.Supp.2d 1264 (2011) Michael GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant. Case No. 11-CV-84-S. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. August 29, 2011. *1265 Richard H. Honaker, Honaker Law Offices, Rock Springs, WY, for Plaintiff. Monty L. Barnett, Peter J. Young, White

OPINION AND ORDER1 LETTOW, Judge. This post-award bid protest is before the court on plaintiffs motion for judgment upon the administrative record and the government’s and intervening-defendants’ cross-motions for judgment. Plaintiff, Vanguard Recovery Assistance, Joint Venture (“Vanguard”), alleges that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA” or the “agency”) improper