Cases

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2025-1735 LT Case No. 05-2021-CA-40129 _____________________________ STEVEN HITCHENS and SELENA HITCHENS, Appellants, v. TOM MURRELL and KAY MURRELL, and PALMA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., d/b/a Las Palmas Condominium Apartments, Appellees. _____________________________

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 25–1244 Submitted January 20, 2026—Filed March 20, 2026 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board, Appellee, vs. Valerie A. Cramer, Appellant. On appeal from the report of the Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission.

MARY R. RUSSELL, Chief Justice. An insurer that refused to defend its insured challenges its liability for damages that were agreed to in a settlement between the insured and a class of plaintiffs that brought suit alleging that the insured violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. section 227 et seq. After the class and the insured reached a settlement, the class filed a garnishment action agai

MEMORANDUM OPINION Sue L. Robinson, Senior District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Quest Integrity USA, LLC (“plaintiff’) initiated the above lawsuits on December 15,2014, by filing complaints against Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. (“Clean Harbors”) and Cokebusters USA Inc. (“Cokebusters”) (collectively, “defendants”) asserting infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,542,874 (“the ’874 patent”), enti

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IMO THE ESTATE OF ) LAMONT WOODS ) C.A. No. 2022-0010-SEM ORDER WHEREAS, on January 4, 2022, Crystal Vaughn (the “Petitioner”) filed a petition for the removal of Latisha Copes (the “Respondent,” together, the “Parties”) as co-personal representative of the estate of Lamont Woods (the “Estate”);1 Lamont Woods (the “Decedent”)

MEMORANDUM OPINION Sue L. Robinson, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION ■ Plaintiff Quest (“plaintiff’) initiated two lawsuits on December 15, 2014, by filing complaints against Cokebusters USA Inc.1 (“Cokebusters”) and Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc.2 (“Clean Harbors”) (collectively, “defendants”) individually,3

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants, former sheriff deputies in Collier and Lee County, Florida, sued the Collier and Lee County sheriffs pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the Florida Minimum Wage Act ("FMWA"),

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SELENA E. MOLINA LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER MASTER IN CHANCERY 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DE 19801-3734

WINFREE, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION The primary issue in this workers' compensation appeal is the answer to this question: When must an employer pay compensation related to permanent partial impairment ratings if doctors in different medical specialities provide different dates of medical stability and separate impairment ratings for injuries to

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SELENA E. MOLINA Leonard L. Williams Justice Center MASTER IN CHANCERY 500 N. King Street, Suite 11400 Wilmington, Delaware 19801-3734 Final Report: August 31, 2021

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. This appeal by a group of Daikon Shield claimants in a Chapter 11 corporate reorganization proceeding involving the appellee A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, challenges the constitutionality of Section 1141(d), 11 U.S.C. It is conceded that Section 1141(d) provides that the confirmation of the plan of reorganization discharges all claims of any kind against a corporate debtor in a reorganizat

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. Plaintiff Selena Hutchinson is a black female employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. She claims that the FBI took several discrete employment actions that constituted discrimination and retaliation. She also alleges that the FBI subjected her to a hostile work environment. Sever

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff Selena Hancock (“Hancock”) suffers from Polyradiculopathy and Polyneuropathy, conditions impacting the nerve roots of her lower spine. She was formerly employed by Defendant' Washington Hospital Center (“WHC” or the “Hospital”) as a Medical Assistant, and she now brings this action alleging that WHC unlawfully failed to accommodate he

OAKES, Circuit Judge: As long as the language of law is ambiguous as it so often is, and so long as lawyers (or laymen) fail to take the time or omit to exercise the acuity necessary to eliminate or reduce that ambiguity, there will be law suits like this one that could have been avoided. The question on this appeal relates to the m

GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge. Defendants Carter, Jones, and O’Meara appeal their convictions for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 21 U.S. C. § 846 and 21 U.S.C. § 845b(a)(l) and (d)(2). Defendants were convicted of various drug-related offenses discovered by an unde

664 F.Supp.2d 1296 (2009) DISCOVER PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff, v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 08-81326-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. October 16, 2009. *1297 John R. Catizone, Selena Donaldson Stallworth, Litchfield Cavo LLP, Tampa, FL, for Plai

9 A.3d 347 (2010) 299 Conn. 196 Selena BROOKS v. Daniel SWEENEY et al. No. 18459. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued January 11, 2010. Decided December 14, 2010. *350 John Q. Gale, Hartford, for the appellant (plaintiff). Dana B. Lee, with whom, on the brief, was Michael C. Conroy

ORDER PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, American Service Insurance Company (ASI), appeals the judgment of the circuit court finding the defendants entitled to judgment as a matter of law on ASI’s petition for declaratory judgment. ASI filed a petition seeking a declaration that the policy issued to Dante Williams (Williams) was void ab initio and/or voidable based on material misrepresentations made by Will

DECISION This matter came before the Court for a jury-waived trial held July 12 through July 14, 2010. This case centers around four special assessments issued by the Defendant Moorland Farm Condominium Association (hereinafter the "Association" or "Defendant") to pay for deck replacements for Phase I condominiums at the Moorland Farm Condominium (hereinafter, "Moorland Farm"). The Plaintiffs' Declaratory Judgment Claim

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1054 CAF 13-02130 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS CARDWELL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JESSICA MIGHELLS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. LEGAL ASSISTANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK, INC., OLEAN (JESSICA L. ANDERSON OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. MARK S. WILLIAMS, PUBL