⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Seeley v. Crews”

District Court, S.D. New York · 1975-06-05 · Published · cited 1× · 396 F. Supp. 129; 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12038
396 F.Supp. 129 (1975) Richard SEELEY, Plaintiff, v. RED STAR TOWING AND TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, v. PENN INDUSTRIES, INC., Third Party Defendant. No. 73 Civ. 3884. United States District Court, S. D. New York. June 5, 1975. *130 McHugh, Heckman, Smith & Leonard, New York City, for
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 180 Ky. 308; 202 S.W. 638; 1918 Ky. LEXIS 50
*309Opinion op the Court by Judge Sampson Reversing. This action- by the administrator of Elmer Seeley against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, was instituted in the Laurel circuit court on the 4th of April, 1914, to recover for the death of Seeley under the federal act. The deceased was only a little more than eighteen ye
Michigan Supreme Court · 1909-07-15 · Published · cited 0× · 157 Mich. 688; 1909 Mich. LEXIS 1066; 122 N.W. 214
Grant, J. Plaintiff’s decedent, a boy eight years and three months old, was playing with four other boys in a puddle of water on Stone street, in the city of Port Huron, opposite the yard of the defendant’s tracks. Stone street runs north and south. The railroad tracks cross the street diagonally in an easterly and westerly direction. Three tracks cross the street. These tracks east of the road immediately branch off into side t
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2023-02-21 · Published · cited 2× · 217 Conn. App. 671
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-02-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENSYLVANIA Jorge Martinez, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 298 C.D. 2023 : Argued: December 4, 2023 Lewis Tree Service (Workers’ : Compensation Appeal Board), : Respondent : BEFORE:
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011-12-06 · Published · cited 56× · 662 F.3d 714; 33 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 251; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24105; 2011 WL 6034297
662 F.3d 714 (2011) Ron WESTMORELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deborah L. SUTHERLAND, individually and in her official capacity as Mayor of the City of Bay Village, Ohio; City of Bay Village, Ohio, Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-3766. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 18, 2011. Decided and Filed: December 6, 2011.
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2026-03-17 · Published · cited 0×
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-06-20 · Published · cited 0×
06/20/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 15, 2019 Session WASHINGTON COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County No. 17-CV-0428 John C. Rambo, Chancellor
Montgomery County Probate Court · 1964-05-01 · Published · cited 0× · 95 Ohio Law. Abs. 337; 205 N.E.2d 135; 33 Ohio Op. 2d 28; 1964 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 296
Zimmers, J. This cause is before the Court on the petition of the Winters National Bank and Trust Company of Dayton, executor of the estate of Charles E. Shawen, deceased, for a determination of the respective rights of the said Bank as Trustee of a testamentary trust under the last will and testament of said Charles E. Shawen, and his brother and sister, Robert B. Shawen and Martha Jane Allaman, with respect to certain real esta
N. R. v. M. P.public domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024-09-03 · Published · cited 7× · 227 Conn. App. 698
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Barrese v. Murraypublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2011-08-16 · Published · cited 27× · 198 Cal. App. 4th 494; 129 Cal. Rptr. 3d 490; 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1076
Opinion FLIER, J. Respondent Katherine Bárrese sued appellant Jacques Gaston Murray under the authority of Marvin v. Marvin (1976) 18 Cal.3d 660 [134 Cal.Rptr. 815, 557 P.2d 106] (Marvin) and was awarded $5.7 million by a jury. Although the trial court stated in the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial that respondent could not be believed, the court denied the motion because it conclud
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017-04-05 · Published · cited 16× · 515 S.W.3d 843; 2017 WL 1250835; 2017 Tenn. LEXIS 191
*845 OPINION Sharon G. Lee, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Holly Kirby, and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined. At issue in this appeal is the liability of a gener
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2016-03-01 · Published · cited 19× · 367 Wis. 2d 131; 2016 WI 13; 876 N.W.2d 99; 26 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 647; 2016 Wisc. LEXIS 13
*181MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN, J. ¶ 142. (dissenting). I agree with the lead opinion's and the concurring/dissenting opinion's conclusion that Weissman v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 2013 WI App 109, 350 Wis. 2d 380, 838 N.W.2d 502, review granted, 2013 WI 3, 352 Wis. 2d 351, 842 N.W.2d 359, need not be overruled. However, I do not agree with the lead opinion's
Shum v. Intel Corp.public domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-08-24 · Published · cited 26× · 499 F.3d 1272; 83 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1933; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20184; 2007 WL 2404718
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge FRIEDMAN. LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Frank T. Shum appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing his claims for correction of inven-torship pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 256 and various state law claims, including fraud, fraudulent concealment, brea
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 178 So. 3d 1061; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 1906; 2015 WL 5714571
MOORE, J. JjThe operator, E & Pco International (“E & Pco”), appeals' a judgment finding that it breached its daywork' drilling contract with the contractor, NorAm Drilling Co., by failing to pay any amount due under the contract, and ordering E & Pco to pay $2.01 million plus contractual interest and reasonable attorney fees. • We affirm. Factual Background The
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2018-03-23 · Published · cited 0× · 183 A.3d 1258
I. This appeal involves a single-vehicle accident that occurred on Omar Road in Sussex County. Ashlee Reed was the driver of the vehicle, and Jacqueline Pavik was her passenger. Reed was injured in the accident. Pavik died from injuries she received. At the time, Omar Road was undergoing reconstruction. The accident occurred on a Sunday night when no construction was taking place and the ro
Barnes v. Dunganpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999-05-20 · Published · cited 3× · 261 A.D.2d 797; 690 N.Y.S.2d 338; 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5556
—Peters, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Mugglin, J.), entered June 1, 1998 in Delaware County, which denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Sharon L. Barnes (hereinafter decedent) was an employee at defendant Peace Plantation Animal Sanctuary in October 1996 when she suffered a heart attack while on duty. Co-worker Jodi Seeley, certified to perf
People v. Raypublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000-06-22 · Published · cited 11× · 273 A.D.2d 611; 710 N.Y.S.2d 138; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7226
Graffeo, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Essex County (Teresi, J.), rendered June 4, 1998, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of attempted assault in the second degree, assault in the third degree and endangering the welfare of a child. Defendant was indicted on various counts related to his activities late in the evening on July 14,1997 when he returned to the residence he shared
Webstad v. Stortinipublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996-10-21 · Published · cited 33× · 924 P.2d 940; 83 Wash. App. 857
Turner, J. (dissenting) — The Webstad family is entitled to their day in court. Susan Webstad was a person with known suicidal tendencies and a history of suicidal gestures. Stortini and Webstad had a pattern in which he would rescue and caretake following each such episode. Their relationship was marked by Webstad’s divorce, treatment for depression and alcohol addiction, and her repeated suicide attempts when Stortini would not
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018-01-17 · Published · cited 2× · 288 F. Supp. 3d 911
WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge Plaintiff James Holder alleges that he suffered from lead poisoning while working on a project to convert the Herbert C. Jackson 's propulsion system from steam- to diesel-powered. He sued the ship's owner, The Interlake Steamship Company, alleging negligence under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (the "Act" or "LHWCA"),