⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rex Venture Group LLC”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-04-27 · Published · cited 0× · 599 F. App'x 519
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order sustaining the Trustee’s objection to Appellants’ Notice of Attorney’s Charging Liens. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-01-07 · Published · cited 0× · 589 F. App'x 157
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Johnny Belsome, et al., appeal from the district court’s order clarifying a prior order and directing that any payments made by the Receiver be sent to a claimant’s home address rather than any third party, including attorneys. This court may exercise jurisdiction on
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2021-06-07 · Published · cited 0×
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) JAAAT Technical Services, LLC ) ASBCA Nos. 61792, 61793, 61794 ) 61795, 61796, 61797 ) 61798, 61799, 61800 ) Under Contract No. W912HN-10-D-0063
California Court of Appeal · 2023-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 4/4/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT RELIANT LIFE SHARES, LLC, B305544 Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant; Los Angeles County SEAN MICHAELS et al., Super. Ct. No. BC604858 Cross-defendants and Appellants; PB CONSULTING #2, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. DANIEL
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-10-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ___________________________________ ) SECOND STREET HOLDINGS LLC, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 22-cv-00253 ) v. ) Filed: September 19, 2022 ) THE UNITED STATES, ) Reissued: October 4, 2
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-07-18 · Published · cited 13× · 266 F. Supp. 3d 705
MEMORANDUM OPINION Lewis A. Kaplan, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on trueEX’s and truePTS’s (collectively, “plaintiffs”) motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent MarkitSERV Limited and MarkitSERV, LLC (collectively, “MarkitSERV”) from barring plaintiffs’ ac*709cess to certain of MarkitSERV’s technology and software.
California Court of Appeal · 2008-04-28 · Published · cited 8× · 75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 795; 162 Cal. App. 4th 598; 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 670
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 600 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 601 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 19-cv-0150 (DLF) v. NICHOLAS D. MUZIN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Broidy Capital Management, LLC (BCM) and Elliott Broidy (together, “Broidy”) brought thi
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2021-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-1230C Filed: February 7, 2021 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: March 18, 20211 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * MORTGAGE CONTRACTING * SERVICES, LLC, * *
District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017-06-28 · Published · cited 1× · 258 F. Supp. 3d 709
OPINION AND ORDER James P. Jones, United States District Judge In this breach of contract action arising under Virginia law, a jury found for the plaintiff and counterclaim defendants, Knox Energy, LLC and Consol Energy, Inc., on the ground that there was no mutual assent to enter into the alleged contract. The defendant and counterclaim plaintiff, Gaseo Drilling, Inc.,’ has moved for a new trial pursuant
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2023-09-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00868-SCT PRICELINE.COM, LLC, PRICELINE.COM INCORPORATED n/k/a BOOKING HOLDINGS, INC., TRAVELWEB LLC, TRIP NETWORK, INC. d/b/a CHEAPTICKETS.COM, ORBITZ, LLC, HOTELS.COM, L.P., EXPEDIA, INC., HOTWIRE, INC., TVL LP f/ka TRAVELOCITY.COM LP, SITE59.COM, LLC v. LYNN FITCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EX REL. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/12/2021 TRIAL JUDGE:
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013-07-17 · Published · cited 14× · 114 Fed. Cl. 258; 2013 WL 3815233
OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT This opinion relates to four consolidated cases filed by the same plaintiff, Gulf Group General Enterprises Co. W.L.L. (Gulf Group), in the United States Court of Federal Claims. 1 The eases arise from four
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2010-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 93 Fed. Cl. 254; 2010 WL 2163094
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER BRADEN, Judge. On December 1, 2009, a post-award bid protest was filed in the United States Court of Federal Claims challenging an August 19, 2009 award by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) of an employee Supplemental Health Benefits Program Contract with an estimated value of [deleted] over the potential five year term. AR at 2168.
California Court of Appeal · 2014-05-05 · Published · cited 99× · 225 Cal. App. 4th 1451; 171 Cal. Rptr. 3d 548; 2014 WL 1761583; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 402; 2014 D.A.R. 5739
Opinion SEGAL, J. * INTRODUCTION In this appeal we consider the questions (1) whether a defendant can be liable for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty without owing the plaintiff a fiduciary duty, (2) what is the statute of limitations for aiding and abetting breach
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2010-11-05 · Published · cited 159× · 96 Fed. Cl. 672; 2010 WL 4484021
OPINION and ORDER BLOCK, Judge. In this post-award bid protest, plaintiff, Line Government Services, LLC (“Line”), challenges the United States Army’s contract award to intervenor, McNeil Technologies, Inc. (“McNeil”). Along with its original pleading, plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, pursuant to Rule 65(a),(b) of the Rules of the United States Court o
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3