Cases

Filed 7/30/21 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MATT PEAR et al., H045045 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. CV227801) v. ORDER MO

Filed 9/26/17; Modified and Certified for Pub. 10/19/17 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DRYDEN OAKS, LLC et al., D069161 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2014-00004077-

Table of Contents Topic Page No. I. Introduction .........................................................1128 II.The Basic Requirements for a Deferred, Like-Kind Exchange Under Section 1031........................................................1130 III. The Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Other, Non-Party Players..............1139 A.

Filed 9/7/18; Modified and certified for publication 10/1/18 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT, D072954 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No.

GOULD, Circuit Judge. We here consider the free speech rights of Christian evangelists who operate religious outreach with the use of amplified sound in the streets of San Francisco, and whose efforts have collided with the City of San Francisco’s prerogative under its noise ordinance and permitting scheme to ensure that its citizens are not subject to unreasonably loud speech a

484 F.3d 1142 Lawrence ROSENBAUM; Eric Livingston, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; Fred Lau, in his official capacity as Chief of the San Francisco Police Dept.; Joel Robinson, in hisofficial capacity as Superintendent of the Recreation and Parks Dept., City and County of San Francisco; Anthony Delucchi, in his official capacity as Director of Property, Real Estate Dept., City and County of San Francisco, Defen

DATO, J. *388In 2001, Michael Durkin used two limited liability companies-Dryden Oaks LLC and Durkin-CAC Lot 24, LLC-to purchase two lots directly adjacent to the McClellan Palomar Airport (Airport) in the City of Carlsbad, California (City). His development plans for the two lots were initially successful despite determinations by the San Dieg

135 F.Supp.2d 992 (2001) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. David E. FITZGERALD, Pacific Genesis Group, Inc., Defendants. No. C 00-4802 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 14, 2001. *993 *994 James A. Howell, Robert L. Mitchell, Christopher

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Englewood Hospital & Medical Center v. State (A-16-24) (089696) Argued April 1, 2025 -- Decided July 16, 2025 FASCIALE, J., writing for a unanimous Court. In this appeal, plaintiffs -- a group o

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT ALTRES, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED DECEMBER 30, 2011 AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT LA RANA HAWAII, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED DECEMBER 30, 2011 LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant ALTRES, Inc.’s (“ALTRES”) Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed December 30, 2011 (“ALTRES Motion”), filed

*424Opinion DONDERO, J. This appeal has been taken from the trial court’s ruling that sustained defendants’ demurrer to all the causes of action of plaintiffs’ complaint and dismissed the action. We find that plaintiffs cannot properly state a cause of action for breach of contract, and defendants have public entity immunity from the remaining noncontrac

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Filed 4/5/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN WARREN M. LENT et al., B292091 Plaintiffs, Appellants, and (Los Angeles County Cross-respondents, Super. Ct. No. BS167531) v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION, Defendant, Respondent, and Cross-appellant, CALIFORNIA STATE COASTA

44 Cal.Rptr.3d 733 (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 718 PACIFIC BELL WIRELESS, LLC, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent; Utility Consumers' Action Network, Real Party in Interest. No. G034991. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three. June 20, 2006. *735 O'Me

Filed 4/16/21 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN WARREN M. LENT et al., B292091 Plaintiffs, Appellants, and (Los Angeles County Cross-respondents, Super. Ct. No. BS167531) v. ORDER MODIFYING

Filed 6/21/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, Plaintiff and Appellant, A146901, A148266 v. (City & County of San Francisco METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT Super. Ct.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

O'ROURKE, Acting P. J. *675Plaintiff and respondent San Diego Unified Port District (District) unsuccessfully asked defendant and appellant California Coastal Commission (Commission) to certify an amendment of District's port master plan (at times, the amendment) to authorize specified hotel development in the East Harbor Island subarea, incl

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN No. 22-15827 ATHLETES, an Oklahoma corporation; FELLOWSHIP OF D.C. No. CHRISTIAN ATHLETES OF 4:20-cv-02798- PIONEER HIGH SCHOOL, an HSG unincorporated association; CHARLOTTE KLARKE; ELIZABETH SINCLAIR, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SAN JOSE UNIFIED SCHOOL

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN No. 22-15827 ATHLETES, an Oklahoma corporation; FELLOWSHIP OF D.C. No. CHRISTIAN ATHLETES OF 4:20-cv-02798- PIONEER HIGH SCHOOL, an HSG unincorporated association; CHARLOTTE KLARKE; ELIZABETH SINCLAIR, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SAN JOSE UNIFIED SCHOOL