Cases

GRASZ, Circuit Judge. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") cited Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., doing business as WalMart Distribution Center #7035 ("Wal-Mart"), for two purported violations of OSHA's regulation relating to bloodborne pathogens, 29 C.F.R. § 19

MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand, ECF No. 18—Granted Joseph F. Leeson, Jr., United States District Judge I. Introduction Defendants removed this case from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. The two named individual defendants are not diverse from most of the Plaintiffs, but Defendants contend that they were fraudulently jo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 1, 2015 Session Heard at Nashville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. HOWARD HAWK WILLIS Automatic Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Washington County No. 28343 Jon Kerry Blackwood, Judge _____________________________ No. E2012-01313-SC-DDT-DD – F

OPINION HOLLY KIRBY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CORNELIA A. CLARK and JEFFREY S. BIVINS, J.J., joined. SHARON G. LEE, C.J, filed a concurring opinion. This appeal arises from the murder of two teenagers, accompanied by the dismemberment of one of them. A jury convicted the defendant, Howard Hawk Willis, of two counts of premeditated first-degree murder and one count

Case: 22-10145 Document: 00516793373 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN PRESTON BAILEY, District Judge. I. Introduction Pending before this Court is the Motion to Dismiss by Defendants American Public Education, Inc., Wallace E. Boston, Jr., and Harry T. Wilkins [Doc. 59], which was filed on March 10, 2011. Following an extended briefing period, the plaintiffs filed their response in opposition [

MEMORANDUM JONES, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff, David M. Koller, began his employment with Defendant, Riley Riper Hollín & Colagreco, at the end of August 2007. During his employment with Defendant, Plaintiff sustained a knee injury, which required him to undergo surgery and to utilize time under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. §§ 260-26

OPINION • Bailey C. Moseley, Justice 1. Background In 2008, oil and gas companies descended on east Texas and Louisiana seeking to acquire leases to exploit the Haynesville Shale formation, which they viewed as having enormous potential. The atmosphere created by these companies was described as “unreal,” “a land rush,” and compa

Stuart's LLC and WAYNE GALVIN, Plaintiffs, againstStuart Edelman, LEVEL 8 APPAREL, LLC, WORLD CROSS CULTURE, INC., WORLDWIDE SOURCING GROUP, LLC, SEUNG BON KIM a/k/a SCOTT KIM a/k/a SAM KIM, PETER LISTER, MICHAEL HONG and MARY-LEE EDELMAN, Defendants. 012560-09

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOHN E. OTT, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. In her complaint this action, Amy Lynn Willmore-Cochran (“Plaintiff”) brings claims alleging race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981; interference and retaliation in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.; as well as claims arising under Alabama la

ORDER JANIS GRAHAM JACK, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Council. (D.E. 160). Plaintiffs have asked the Court to certify one General Class and four subclasses. Also currently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the claims of named plaintiffs D.I., S.R.,1 M.R.,

440 F.Supp.2d 249 (2006) DE BEERS LV TRADEMARK LIMITED and De Beers LV Limited, Plaintiff, v. DeBEERS DIAMOND SYNDICATE INC. and Marvin Rosenblatt, Defendants. No. 04 CIV.4099(DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 9, 2006. *250 *251 *252 <

The opinion of the court was delivered by McFarland, J.: This is an action by two individuals engaged in the automobile brokering business and six credit unions (who refer members interested in the purchase of new automobiles to automobile brokers) against the defendants Director of the Division of Vehicles of the Kansas Department of Revenue and the State of Kansas seeking: (1) a declaratory judgment that

810 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2011) In re HYDROXYCUT MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. Case No. 09md2087BTM (CAB). United States District Court, S.D. California. August 29, 2011. *1104 Gayle M. Blatt, Casey, Gerry, Schenk, Francavilla, Blatt & Penfield LLP, Todd D. Carpenter, Tonna K. Farrar, Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint,

298 F.Supp.2d 1259 (2003) In re: MANAGED CARE LITIGATION This Document Relates to Provider Track Cases No. MDL 1334-MD. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. December 8, 2003. *1260 *1261 *1262 *1263