⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Seaver v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et”

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 11, 2015 Session CHANDRA L. BERRY v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH1210532 James Kyle, Chancellor No. W2014-02175-COA-R3-CV – Filed August 31, 2015 This appeal involves th
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2013-01-24 · Published · cited 0× · 488 B.R. 638; 2013 WL 980171; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 959
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT J. KRESSEL, Bankruptcy Judge. This adversary proceeding came on for trial on November 20, 2012. Matthew R. Burton appeared for the plaintiff. William P. Wassweiler and Karla M. Vehrs appeared on behalf of New Buffalo Auto Sales, LLC, and Palladium Holdings, LLC; Mychal A. Bruggeman appeared on behalf of Maurice J. Wagener and David J. Meyers appeared on behal
California Court of Appeal · 2014-05-27 · Published · cited 6× · 226 Cal. App. 4th 643
Opinion JENKINS, J. This is an appeal from an order denying the special motion to strike of defendants Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Corporation and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (collectively, Rating Agencies or defendants), 1 against plaintiff California’s Public Employees’ Retirement S
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014-10-16 · Published · cited 84× · 307 Mich. App. 204; 859 N.W.2d 238
O’CONNELL, J. This challenge to a mortgage foreclosure by advertisement is one of the spate of actions that have arisen in Michigan. Mortgagors, mortgagees, mortgage servicing agents, and the courts have contended with statutes, caselaw, and procedural rules attempting to lay bare the proper method of challenging foreclosure. Plaintiffs claims in this case present several issues the
Morgan v. Henniganpublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1974-06-21 · Published · cited 79× · 379 F. Supp. 410; 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7973
379 F.Supp. 410 (1974) Tallulah MORGAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. James W. HENNIGAN et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 72-911-G. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 21, 1974. *411 *412 *413 *414 Nathaniel R. Jo
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-10-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00216-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/9/2015 2