Cases

04/25/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 7, 2017 Session KHURSHID ISMOILOV v. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 15C3758 Thomas W. Brothers, Judge No. M2017-00897-COA-R3-CV Thi

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: Alleging that his employer improperly administered life insurance benefits, an *176 employee brought suit for misrepresentation, constructive fraud, and infliction of emotional distress. Because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) completely preem

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Hall and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and A

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Harrell v. Fla. Construction Specialists, 834 So.2d 352, 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“We hold that the termination of supplemental benefits pursuant to ... section 440.15(l)(f)l., Florida Statutes (1995) is not a reverse offset pursuant to section 440.15(10)-”). BENTON, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Paula Xinis, United States District Judge Pending is a Motion to Exclude the expert report and testimony of Peter Maga-Ihaes (ECF No. 82) and a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 71) filed by Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants JFJ Toys, Inc. and Fred Ramirez (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). The issues are fully briefed and the Court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6 because no he

ORDER Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to withdraw these appeals, It Is Ordered That: (1) The motion is granted. The appeals are dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. (3) All pending motions are moot.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On October 6, 2011, Neva Day filed this action against Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Holdings Management Corporation, Sears, Roebuck & Co., Sears Outlet Stores, LLC, and certain fictitious defendants.1 Day pled eleven causes of action: (1) gender discrimination in violation of

635 F.Supp.2d 323 (2009) Fred P. CAMPO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 4053 (LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 21, 2009. *324 Jay W. Eisenhofer, Esq., Geoffrey C. Jarvis, Esq., Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Samuel H. Rudman, Esq., David A. Rosenfeld, Esq., C

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs cured any alleged breach of a sublease between the parties, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Grossman, J.), dated April 3, 2014, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment declaring that they had cured any alleged breach of the parties’ sublease.

764 F.Supp.2d 931 (2011) AAA INSTALLERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:10-cv 00237. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton. January 10, 2011. *935 Mark J. Bamberger, The Mark Bamberger Co., LLC, Tipp City, OH, for Plaintiffs. ENTRY A

557 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2008) Rose BAKER, Plaintiff, v. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-cv-01106-MSK-MEH. United States District Court, D. Colorado. October 3, 2007. *1210 Scott Robert Armitage, Scott Armitage, P.C., Westminster, CO, for Plaintiff. Kevin Gerard Ripplinger, Godin & Baity, LLC, Den

MEMORANDUM Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge Some personal injury cases spring from highly questionable circumstances, and others from undeniably life-altering events. Setting aside ultimate questions of liability and damages, this litigation is tragically one of the latter. When Plaintiff Daniel Fassett heard sputtering sounds emitting from his lawnmower, he attempted to relieve the pressure

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Holmes and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner H

908 N.E.2d 556 (2009) SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria PAPPAS, County Treasurer and Ex Officio County Collector of Cook Illinois, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-08-1115. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. May 7, 2009. Rehearing Denied June 2, 2009. *558 Richard A. De

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge *888This long-running patent dispute proceeded to trial a year ago. Plaintiff LoggerHead Tools, LLC prevailed, winning a jury verdict and a large damages award against Defendants Sears Holdings Corp. and Apex Tool Group, LLC, on claims that by selling the "Max Axess Locking Wrench," Defendants infringed LoggerHead's pat

(2008) Robert LOWE v. SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION. Civil No. 08-cv-00013-JL. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. March 4, 2008. ORDER JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge. The plaintiff, Robert Lowe, commenced this suit in Hillsborough County Superior Court against his former employer, Sears Holding Corporation, alleging wrongf

PER CURIAM. In this workers’ compensation appeal, the claimant challenges (1) the number of hours of attendant care'awarded by the judge of- compensation claims (JCC), and (2) the constitutionality of the section 440.13(2)(b)l., Florida Statutes, which limits payment of nonprofessional attendant care by family members to the federal minimum hourly wage. Both claims are meritless. ‘ With respect to the first' claim, ample c

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN W. DARRAH, United States District Court Judge Plaintiff LoggerHead Tools, LLC (“LoggerHead”) filed suit against Sears Holding Corporation (“Sears”) on November 9, 2012, alleging eight separate counts against Sears. Sears filed a Motion to Dismiss Counts II, III, and VIII of the Complaint, which stated claims of common law fraud, tortious interference with busin

OPINION GORDON, Judge: In this action Plaintiff, Sears Holdings Management Corp., challenges the classification of imported merchandise within the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”). Defendant moves to dismiss pursuant USCIT Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,