Cases

Syllabus 1. Fedziuk v. Commissioner of Public Safety struck down as unconstitutional the 2003 amendments to Minn.Stat. § 169A.53 , and revived "the version of [Minn.Stat. § 169A.53 ] * * * that existed immediately prior to the 2003 amendments." Fedziuk , 696 N.W.2d 340 , 349 (Minn. 2005). This version of

258 F.Supp.2d 1263 (2003) THE CITY OF TULSA, the Tulsa Metropolitan Utility Authority, Plaintiffs, v. 1. TYSON FOODS, INC., 2. Cobb-Vantress, Inc., 3. Peterson Farms, Inc., 4. Simmons Foods, Inc., 5. Cargill, Inc., 6. George's, Inc., 7. City of Decatur, Arkansas, Defendants. No. 01-CV-0900-EA(C). United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. March 14, 2003.

592 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2008) ACCO BRANDS, INC. d/b/a Kensington Technology Group, Plaintiff, v. PC GUARDIAN ANTI-THEFT PRODUCTS, INC. and Fellowes, Inc., Defendants. No. C 04-03526 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 4, 2008. *1212 Otis W. Carroll, Ireland Carroll & Kelley, P.C., Tyler, TX, Brian A.E. Smi

IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct

781 F.Supp.2d 1221 (2011) Henry T. WITTENBERG, D.O., Plaintiff, v. OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, Michael Fogarty, in his official capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Nico Gomez, in his official capacity as the State Medicaid Director, Lynn Mitchell, M.D., in his official capacity as the State Medical Director, Innovative Resource Group, LLC, d/b/a APS Healthcare Midwest, a/k/a APS, a/k/a APS Healthcare

11 Cal.4th 50 (1995) 900 P.2d 648 44 Cal. Rptr.2d 399 THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. STATE LANDS COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; RICHARD K. LOVELACE et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. S037729. Supreme Court of California. August 31, 1995.

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. bln- this property contamination case for injunctive relief and restoration damages against numerous mineral lessees, the trial court granted the lessees’ dilatory exceptions of prematurity and improper cumulation, dismissed the property owner’s suit without prejudice, and denied her motion for new trial. On appeal, we reverse the trial court’s granting of the exception of prematurity but affirm the

PETERS, J. liThe original petition filed in this litigation lists the plaintiffs as follows: Marcus Broussard, Jr.; Flo Broussard; R. Brady Broussard; Whitestone, Inc., a Louisiana corporation; Joseph Vallee; Suzanne Vallee; and Vallee Land Company, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company. In that original petition, the plaintiffs consolidated damage claims involving eight different tracts of immovable property (hereinaft

Chapter 11 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SEAN H. LANE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Eugene I. Davis, Litigation Trustee for the Quebecor World Litigation Trust (the “Trustee”). The Trustee asserts that ten transfers totaling $69,207.60 by the debtors to the defendant Clarklif

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO . 13-0670 444444444444 IN RE DEEPWATER HORIZON, RELATOR 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON CERTIFIED QUESTIONS FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

529 U.S. 89 (2000) UNITED STATES v. LOCKE, GOVERNOR OF WASHINGTON, et al. No. 98-1701. United States Supreme Court. Argued December 7, 1999. Decided March 6, 2000.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *90 *91

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Table of Contents I. Factual Findings.. .38 A. Attack on the U.S. Special Mission Compound in Benghazi, Libya.... 38 B. Abu Khatallah’s Personal Background ... 39 C. Preparation for Abu Khatallah’

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: The September 11th terrorist attacks revealed, in the starkest terms, just how dangerous and interconnected the world is. While Americans depended on technology for the conveniences of modernity, al-Qaeda plotted in a seventh-century milieu to use that technology against us. It was a bold jujitsu. And it succeeded because conventiona

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

903 F.Supp. 532 (1995) The STATE OF NEW YORK, by Attorney General Dennis C. VACCO, et al., Plaintiff, v. REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD., et al., Defendants. No. 95 Civ. 3143 (JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 20, 1995. Pamela Jones Harbour, Joseph Opper, Linda J. Gargiulo, Assistant Attorneys General, New York City, for State of New York and loca

263 F.Supp.2d 209 (2003) Samantha J. COMFORT, on behalf of her minor child and friend, Elizabeth NEUMYER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LYNN SCHOOL COMMITTEE, et al., Defendants, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant-Intervenor. Todd Bollen, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lynn School Committee, et al., Defendants. No. C.A.99-11811-NG, C.A.01-10365-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.