Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Seadrill New Finance Limited”
OPINION ARCENEAUX, District Judge. This matter came before the court on Motion of plaintiff, The Boatmen’s National Bank of St. Louis (“Boatmen’s National”) to Amend and Increase Judgment to include an award of attorneys fees and expenses. For reasons set forth hereinafter, the motion is DENIED. The procedural history of this matter is found in the record. On June 8, 1983, plaintiff filed
Karim v. Finch Shipping Co.public domain
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: This appeal is by Paul C. Miniclier; under a contingent fee contract, he represented Fazal Karim, a Bangladeshi national, for injuries received while a seaman. Karim was brought to New Orleans upon being injured but was deported to Bangladesh prior to the judgment in his favor being paid into the district court’s registry. At issue is whethe
Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Majority and Concurring Opinions filed December 20, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00213-CV CARGOTEC CORPORATION, MACGREGOR USA, INC. AND CARGOTEC USA, INC., Appellants V. LOGAN INDUSTRIES, Appellee On Appeal from the 506th Judicial Distric
In re Serviços de Petróleo Constellation S.A.public domain
MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *243I. INTRODUCTION On December 7, 2018, Andrew Childe (the "Foreign Representative" or "Petitioner") commenced the jointly administered Chapter 15 Cases and sought this Court's recognition of the joint judicial reorganization (recuperação judicial
POSNER, Circuit Judge. Robyn Douglass, the actress and model, obtained $600,000 in damages in this diversity suit against the corporation that publishes Hustler magazine, for invasion of her right of privacy. 607 F.Supp. 816. Hustler (as we shall call the magazine and its publisher interchangeably) has appealed, raising questions of tort
Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
43 Cal.3d 858 (1987) 741 P.2d 124 239 Cal. Rptr. 626 ABBOTT FORD, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. L.A. 32138. Supreme Court of California. September 3, 1987. *862 COUNSEL <
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Facts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 II. Motion to Remand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 A. The Authority of the Texas Attorney General . . . . . 10 B. Other Motions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 C. The Intervenors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
999 F.2d 831 62 USLW 2175, 26 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1379 LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, COUNCIL NO. 4434,Plaintiffs-Appellees,andJesse Oliver, et al., Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.William P. CLEMENTS, Etc., et al., Defendants.Jim MATTOX, et al., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants,v.Judge F. Harold ENTZ, Etc., Judge Sharolyn Wood, Etc., andGeorge S. Bayoud, Jr., Etc., Defendants-