Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON FIRSTBANK PUERTO RICO’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL Michael G. Williamson, United States Bankruptcy Judge This Court recently confirmed a chapter 11 plan that provides for the payment of approximately $122 million to FirstBank Puerto Rico over 30 years. To make the plan work, the Debtors, who operate a resort in the British Virgin Islands, had to acqu

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA RDM Group and Zom : Construction Company, : Appellants : No. 1081 C.D. 2021 : v. : Submitted: September 23, 2022 : Pittston Township Zoning : Hearing Board and Pittston

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER GRANTING EMPLOYER AND PLAN DEFENDANTS’ OMNIBUS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6), AS WELL AS 12(B)(2), (4), AND (5), 20(A) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A) [1062] [1070] [1071] [1072] [1075] [1077] [1078] [1080] [1081] [1082] [1083] [1084] [1085] [1086] [1088] [1089] [1090] [1091] [1092]. [1093] [1094] [1095] [1096] [1097] [1098] [1100] [1101] [1105] [1106] [1107] [1108] [1109] [1110]

42 A.3d 40 (2012) 425 Md. 482 MARYLAND BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, et al. v. K. HOVNANIAN'S FOUR SEASONS AT KENT ISLAND, LLC. No. 67, September Term, 2011. Court of Appeals of Maryland. April 23, 2012. *41 Adam D. Snyder, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, John B. Howard, Jr., Deputy

OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT This opinion relates to four consolidated cases filed by the same plaintiff, Gulf Group General Enterprises Co. W.L.L. (Gulf Group), in the United States Court of Federal Claims. 1 The eases arise from four

Supreme Court No. 2023-74-Appeal. (NC 17-114) Thomas Knudsen, Trustee, et al. : v. : Gregory DeJean. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme

ACCEPTED 01-12-00578-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

552 S.E.2d 103 (2001) 250 Ga. App. 798 EAST BEACH PROPERTIES, LTD. v. TAYLOR et al. Taylor et al. v. Ryals. Ryals v. Taylor et al. Nos. A01A0028-A01A0030. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 9, 2001. Reconsideration Denied July 31, 2001. *105 Abbott & Abbott, Anth

126 Cal.App.3d 221 (1981) 178 Cal. Rptr. 708 SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. 59428. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One. November 30, 1981. *226 COUNSEL George Deukmejian, At

ORDER Michael M. Mihm, United States District Judge Now before the Court is KBR, Inc. and Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.’s (collectively referred to as “KBR” or “Defendants”)1 Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 38) filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, KBR’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 38) is DENIED. <

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. ("AFS") commenced this action alleging that the collective defendants-a former employee and several of AFS's competitors-colluded to deprive AFS of its trade secrets and valuable business opportunities. Following more than four years of litigation and several rounds of dispositive motion practice, the court

815 A.2d 652 (2002) MANAYUNK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL, Friends of Manayunk Canal, Jane Glenn, Kevin Smith, Dolores Lombardi and Darlene Messina, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Dranoff Properties, Inc. Appeal of Dranoff Properties, Inc. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 6, 2002. Decided December 23, 2002. Reargume

OPINION HON. KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J. Plaintiff Daniel Bock, Jr. brought this action against a law firm, Pressler and Pressler, LLP (“Pressler”), based on a debt collection action that Pressler initiated against Bock in State court. While that state court action was pending, Bock brought this federal court action against Pressler, alleging that Pressler made a •false or misleading representation in violati

OPINION {¶ 1} Although originally placed on our accelerated calendar, we have elected, pursuant to Local Rule 12(5), to issue a full opinion in lieu of a judgment entry. {¶ 2} Defendant-Appellant, Erie Insurance ("Erie"), 1 appeal the judgment of the Allen County Court of Common Pleas granting partial summary judgment in favor of Pl

PER CURIAM: Bryan Whitehead appeals his convictions and 471-month total sentence for two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and two counts of brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). After careful review of the entire record, and' with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm Whitehead’s convictions, but vacate Whitehead’s sentences and remand for re-s

[Cite as State v. Durham, 2024-Ohio-3289.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. J

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0156p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MAX RACK, INC., │ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHONG LAM, No. 19-16243 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:18-cv-00936-LB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Cal

OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff Raymond Lindsey (“Lindsey”) has sued his former employer, Defendant Clatskanie People’s Utility District (“CPUD”), for religious discrimination in violation of federal and state civil rights laws, retaliation in violation of federal and state civil rights laws, whistleblower relation in violation of state whistleblower laws, and wrongful discha

654 F.3d 310 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Matthew MARINO, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 09-1965-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: May 10, 2010. Decided: August 18, 2011. *311 Eugene J. Riccio, Gulash & Riccio, Bridgeport, CT, for Defendant-Appellant. Margery