Cases

PER CURIAM. Beverly A. Spencer seeks review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) affirming the reconsideration decision of the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) that denied her application for a disability retirement. Spencer v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., No. CH831E010648-I-1, 2003 WL 21961313 (Aug. 12, 2003). We affirm. I As the gove

960 F.Supp. 835 (1997) SPENCER SAVINGS BANK, SLA f/k/a Spencer Savings and Loan Association, Plaintiff, v. EXCELL MORTGAGE CORP., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 91-4909 (JCL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 7, 1997. Philip L. Guarino, Ross & Hardies, Somerset, NJ, for Spencer Savings Bank, SLA. Shalom D. Stone, Walder, Sondak &am;

The sole question presented in this case involves the liability of a municipal corporation for injuries sustained by a person by reason of the defective condition of an amusement device operated for profit in a public park owned by such municipal corporation. Fred R. Scroggins brought this suit against the City of Harlingen and a group of other defendants, designated herein as the Carnival Company, for injuries received by him when he was riding on an amusement device known as the "Mer

174 F.Supp.2d 424 (2001) PBM PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, Defendant. No. 3:01CV199. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. October 25, 2001. *425 Paul Geoffrey Gill, Office of the Public Defender, Richmond, VA, Charles Michael Sims, Robert Francis Redmond, Jr., Le-Clair Ryan,

174 F.Supp.2d 417 (2001) PBM PRODUCTS, INC. Plaintiff. v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY Defendant. No. 3:01CV199. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. October 25, 2001. *418 Paul Geoffrey Gill, Office of the Public Defender, Richmond, VA, Charles Michael Sims, Robert Francis Redmond, Jr., LeClair Ryan, Ric

MEMORANDUM OPINION SPENCER, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Mead Johnson & Company’s Motion to Dismiss or Strike Certain Claims Asserted in the Complaint, filed on September 12, 2001. Defendant Mead Johnson & Company (“Mead”) filed a motion to dismiss or strike certain claims pursuant to Rules 12(c) and 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mead see

Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 558 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CR-16-27 TAMARA DAWSON Opinion Delivered: November 16, 2016 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch’s homepage at http:/ /www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association’s homepage at http:/ /www.cobar.org. ADVANCE SHEET HEADNOTE March 14, 2022 2022 CO 12 No. 21SA187, Skillett v. Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.—C.A.R. 21.1, Certified Questions of State Law —Insurance —Companies and Persons Liable — Statutory Bad Faith In this case, the suprem

*282 MELANSON, Judge. Troy Cameron Young appeals from the district court’s order on intermediate appeal affirming Young’s judgment of conviction for domestic battery in the presence of a child. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDU

225 F.3d 929 (8th Cir. 2000) JAMES TARSNEY, JOE LOEFFLER, WAYNE OLHOFT, TAD JUDE, DR. STEVE CALVIN, DR. KAREN KARN, DR. KONALD PREM, DR. STANLEY JOHNSON, BRIAN GIBSON, JACK WEILAND, RUSS ROONEY, MARY ROONEY, DAVID RACER, EUGENE KEATING, JOSEPH KUEPPERS, JOHN C. CERRITO, DAVID STATES, MARY KAY STATES, KEITH JENSEN, ELIZABETH JENSEN, ROBERTA BECKER, LINDA PETTMAN, KAREN MESSICCI, ANGELA HEITHAUS, RENAE LAVOI, CHERI EMDE, MARY JACOBS, JUDY HADLEY,

2023 IL 127241 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 127241) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. JOHN PRANTE, Appellee. Opinion filed May 18, 2023. J

707 S.E.2d 158 (2011) BOATRIGHT v. The STATE. No. A10A2120. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 8, 2011. *160 Benjamin D. Goldberg, Michael R. McCarthy, for appellant. Kermit N. McManus, District Attorney, Stephen E. Spencer, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. MILLER, Presiding Judge. Following a jury

EISMANN, Justice. This is an appeal out of Idaho County from a jury verdict of guilty to and the sentence for the crime of first degree murder of a three-year-old child. The defendant challenges the failure of the district court to appoint him substitute counsel, the jury instructions defining felony murder, and his sentence of life in prison without parole. We affirm the convic

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-2986 ___________ James Tarsney, Joe Loeffler, Wayne * Olhoft, Tad Jude, Dr. Steve Calvin, Dr. * Karen Karn, Dr. Konald Prem, Dr. * Stanley Johnson, Brian Gibson, Jack * Weiland, Russ Rooney, Mary Rooney, * David Racer, Eugene Keating, Jo

Garry Ray Winsett ("the former husband") and Rebecca Borden Winsett Woodward ("the former wife") were divorced on July 8, 1993. They had two children. The former wife was awarded primary physical custody of the parties' older daughter, and the former husband was awarded primary physical custody of the parties' younger daughter. The divorce judgment incorporated the agreement of the parties that waived child support based on the former husband and the former wife each maintaining suppo

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Richard Louis Sloane, AG No. 37, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Hotten, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE –– SANCTION –– INDEFINITE SUSPENSION –– The Supreme Court of Maryland indefinitely suspended Respondent, Richard Louis Sloane, from the practice of law in Maryland with the right to apply for reinstatement after six months. The Court held that Respondent violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-303.1 (Meritorious Claims and Contention

WIENER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment dismissing their Fourth Amendment, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive force and state law claims against Defendants-Appellees, the City of Tupelo and Officer Cook. Pl

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

2021 IL App (5th) 200074 NOTICE Decision filed 04/12/21. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-20-0074 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for IN THE Rehearing or the disposition of the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE O