Cases

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _________________________ No. 18-11388-G _________________________ JAMES MICHAEL HAND, et al., Appellees, versus RICK SCOTT, in his official capacity as Governor of Fl

PETTIGREW, J. |2Plaintiffs-appellants1 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Scotts) appeal from the trial court’s judgment in favor of *768defendants-appellees2 dismissing their petition for a predial servitude of right of passage and writ of mandamus. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment

OPINION ANDERSON, Justice. This case raises the question of what contacts a defendant must have with Minnesota before pur courts can exercise specific.'personal jurisdiction over that defendant. Appellant -MoneyMutual, LLC, claims that the district court erred when it concluded that it could exercise specific personal jurisdiction over MoneyMutual based

OPINION SMITH, Judge. We affirm the district court’s denial of appellant MoneyMutual’s motion to dismiss because the respondents alleged sufficient minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction. The district court also did not abuse its discretion when it determined that the lenders were not indispensable parties. FACTS </

184 Cal.App.4th 1506 (2010) 109 Cal.Rptr.3d 846 RHONDA SCOTT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RUSSEL THOMPSON et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. G041860. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. May 26, 2010. *1509 Law Offices of Fred J. Knez and Fred J. Knez for Plaintiff and Appe

753 F.Supp.2d 1 (2010) Saleh Abdulla AL-OSHAN et al., Petitioners, v. Barack OBAMA et al., Respondents. No. Civil Action No. 05-0520(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 19, 2010. Julia Tarver-Mason Wood, Whitney Dougherty Russell, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Michelle Anne Jones, U.S. District Court for the Distric

209 B.R. 451 (1997) Ronald R. PETERSON, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Richard E. SCOTT, et al., Defendants. In re Richard E. and Marilyn SCOTT, Douglas W. Scott, Douglas H. and Sarah Scott, Debtors. No. 96 C 4918, Adversary Nos. 90 A 0535, and 85 B 15663 thru 85 B 15665. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 1, 1997.

171 Cal.App.4th 540 (2009) WILLIAM D. SCOTT, JR., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent; RACHAEL A. CHILDRESS et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. C059686. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. February 25, 2009. *542 Teresa A. Stanley for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent

405 F.3d 1251 Jacqueline SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Mark F. TAYLOR, in his Official Capacity as Lieutenant Governor of Georgia, Stan Watson, in his Official Capacity as Chairperson of the DeKalbCounty House Delegation and a Member of the Georgia House of Representatives, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 04-11302. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

530 S.E.2d 208 (2000) 242 Ga. App. 455 SCOTT v. MAMARI CORPORATION et al. No. A99A1757. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 22, 2000. *210 Newman, Sapp & Davis, Michele L. Davis, Atlanta, for appellant. Stewart, Melvin & Frost, J. Douglas Stewart, Gainesville, for appellees.

340 F.Supp.2d 371 (2004) Keenan M. SCOTT, Thomas Logan, John Loomis, Robert Davidson, and Michael C. Demartino, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW YORK and The New York City Police Department, Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 9530(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 23, 2004. *373 Thomas P. Puccio, Law Offices of Thoma

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Perry L. Scott, Sr. and other individuals (collectively, “the plaintiffs”) brought this action on behalf of the deceased Phillip Scott (“Mr. Scott”) in Illinois state court. *754 They claimed that Officer Rodney Edin-burg (“Officer Edinburg”) impermissibly had used deadly forc

1 Argued and submitted January 13; decision of Court of Appeals reversed, judgment of circuit court affirmed July 8, 2022 Michelle SCOTT, Petitioner on Review, v. Leslie KESSELRING and Kesselring Communications, LLC, Respondents on Review. (CC CV15110065) (CA A163709) (SC S068503)

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying as Moot Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs in this case are former employees of the District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency who were

424 B.R. 315 (2010) In re Jamal T. SCOTT and Debra L. Scott, Debtors. William Todd Drown, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., Defendants. In re Amelia F. Bridgeforth, Debtor. William Todd Drown, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Colony Mortgage Corp., et al., Defendants. In re Steven W. Walsh and Mandy A. Walsh, Debtors. William Todd Drown, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. America's Wholesale Lender, et al., Defe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Thomas M. Moulton v. Civil No. 14-cv-265-JD Opinion No. 2016 DNH 090 David Bane and Prime Choice Enterprises, LLC O R D E R Following a bench trial, the court found in favor of Thomas M. Moulton on his claim under New Hampshire’s Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), RSA cha

Mark E. Walker, United States District Judge This Court is not the Vote-Restoration Czar. It does not pick and choose who may receive the right to vote and who may not. Nor does it write the rules and regulations for the Executive Clemency Board. Instead, this Court possesses the well-known and unsurprising "province and duty ... to say what the law is." Marbury v. Madison , 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Mica Saint-Jean, Guerline Bourciquot, and Marie Dorlus have brought claims against defendant District of Columbia (“D.C.”) under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207, et seq., the D.C. Whistleblower Protection Act (“WPA”), D.C.Co

07/09/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 6, 2024 Session LEIBY GOLDBERGER ET AL. v. THOMAS J. SCOTT ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 22-1256-BC Anne C. Martin, Chancellor _____________________________

Lifespan v . NEMC, et a l . CV-06-241-JL 5/24/11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND Lifespan Corporation v. Civil N o . 06-cv-421-JNL Opinion N o . 2011 DNH 083 New England Medical Center, Inc., now known as Tufts Medical Center Parent, Inc., and New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc., now known as Tufts Medical Center, Inc. and Martha C