Cases

788 F.Supp. 919 (1992) TIMBERTON GOLF, L.P., a Mississippi Limited Partnership, Plaintiff, v. McCUMBER CONSTRUCTION, INC. and McCumber Golf, Inc., d/b/a Mark McCumber and Associates, Defendants. Civ. A. No. H92-0035(R). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, S.D. April 3, 1992. *920 Mark D. Hebert, Ott, Purdy & Scott

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-22-00157-CR ________________ JEFFREY MERRITT MCCUMBER JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _____________________________________________________

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered February 5, 2007. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendants Roger M. Decker, Jr. and T.J. Madden Construction Company, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff co

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-22-00157-CR ________________ JEFFREY MERRITT MCCUMBER JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ____________________________________________________

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered August 4, 2006 in a wrongful death action. The order denied the motion of defendant Robert McCumber for leave to amend his answer in action No. 1 to assert an affirmative defense of medical emergency. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED HERNANDO HMA, LLC, D/B/A BAYFRONT HEALTH SPRING HILL, F/K/A SPRING HILL HOSPITAL, Petitioner, v.

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC17-1510 ____________ THE FLORIDA BAR RE: ADVISORY OPINION— SHORE v. WALL, et al. October 4, 2018 PER CURIAM. James Wall filed with the Standing Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law (Standing Committee) a request for issuance of an advisory opinion pursuan

269 F.Supp.2d 772 (2003) Wylanda GALES, Patricia Gamble, Daniel Glass, Dorothy McGee, Jerry Scott, Jr., and Charles Wesley Plaintiffs v. CBS BROADCASTING, INC.; Media General Operations, Inc., d/b/a WJTV; Wyatt Emmerich; Beau Strittman; Don Hewitt; Morley Safer; Deidre Naphin; Jennifer Breheny; and John Does 1-50 Defendants No. CIV.A.5:03-CV-35(BRS). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, West

ORFINGER, J. Mariann Lindsay, Personal Representative of the Estate of Walter Edward Es-terline, seeks certiorari review of an order denying her motion to amend her complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. We deny the petition. Lindsay filed suit against Avante At Leesburg, Inc. and AG Holdings, Inc. (collectively “Avante”), the operators of a nursing home where Walter Esterline resided, assertin

827 F.Supp.2d 461 (2011) Monique VANSTORY-FRAZIER, Plaintiff, v. CHHS HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC, t/d/b/a Chestnut Hill Hospital, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-3910. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 29, 2011. *462 Timothy M. Kolman, Wayne A. Ely, Kolman Ely P.C., Penndel, PA, for Plaintiff. Stuart Turv

PER CURIAM. We deny the petition for prohibition without prejudice to seek appellate review if access to the sealed records is granted. See Scott v. Nelson, 697 So.2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). PROHIBITION DENIED. SAWAYA, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge. Wells Fargo Delaware -Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee for Vericrest Opportunity Loan Trust 201-NPL1, appeals from an order involuntarily dismissing its foreclosure complaint after a bench trial. 1 Because the trial court erroneously concluded that Wells Fargo’s servicer, C

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 1, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D16-2756 Lower Tribunal No. 14-27252 ________________ David Rahimi, etc.,

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WELLS FARGO DELAWARE TRUST ) COMPANY, N.A., as trustee for ) VERICREST OPPORTUNITY LOAN ) LOAN TRUST 201-NPL1, )

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. WEINREIS NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER Sarah S. Vance, Chair Before the Panel: Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Eastern District of New York. This litigation consists of 149 actions pending in two districts, as listed on Schedule A. All plaintiffs oppose centralization of these actions.

705 S.E.2d 275 (2010) BRUSCATO v. O'BRIEN. No. A10A1230. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 1, 2010. Reconsideration Denied December 16, 2010. *277 William G. Quinn III, Jerry D. McCumber, Decatur, for appellant. Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney, Milton B. Satcher III, Laura C. Marshall, Atlanta

ORDER NEWELL EDENFIELD, District Judge. This action is before the court on intervenors’ motion seeking clarification of certain provisions of the consent decree entered into on September 11, 1980 by plaintiff, DeKalb County, the DeKalb County Police Department, and intervenors representing the Fraternal Order of Police. Intervenors ask the court to rule on the effect of the following under

970 So.2d 346 (2007) Jessie JACKSON Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D05-1491. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 23, 2007. Rehearing Denied April 23, 2007. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

OPINION & ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge. Four government officials and two voters have, collectively, moved to intervene as defendants in this case, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. The court is not persuaded that the proposed intervenors have identified interests that would entitle them to intervene, nor is the court persuaded that their interests would be impaired if the cou