Cases

487 F.3d 1115 Larry W. MEUIR, Appellant,v.GREENE COUNTY JAIL EMPLOYEES; Reed; Captain Glenn; Captain Anderson; Kenneth Clayton; Jack Merritt; Cole; Bisby; Hilder; Scott; Clavin; West; Michael Oravec; Greene County; Carey Bisbey, Appellees. No. 05-3394. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 14, 2007. Filed: June 6, 20

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Larry Meuir brought this action pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that while he was incarcerated in the Greene County Jail (“the Jail”), the Jail’s medical staff was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Meuir also contended that the staff retaliated against him for refusing to visit a dentist who he alleges foll

Mark E. Walker, United States District Judge This Court has considered, without hearing, Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 41, and Defendant's motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 50. Although Plaintiff may be chomping at the bit to get to trial, Defendant's motion is GRANTED . Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. I This is a case ab

ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge, concurring: I agree with the panel’s conclusion that our decision in Intervest Construction, Inc. v. Canterbury Estate Homes, Inc. (“Intervest”), 554 F.3d 914 (11th Cir. 2008), drives this ease and requires affirmance of the district court’s entry of judgment under Rule 50. But I think that Intervest represents a wrong turn in our Circuit’s copyright jurisprudenc

ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Home Design Services, Inc. (“Home Design”) filed this suit against Defendants for copyright infringement of an architectural home design titled “HDS-2089,” claiming that Defendants built 165 infringing homes as part of their “Lau*1205rent” and “Dakota” designs based on slightly modified

HARVEY E. SCHLESINGER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1333THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendants' Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support (Doc. 115) and Plaintiff's Response and Memorandum of Law in Opposition thereto (Doc. 120). After careful consideration of the issues presented, Defen

639 F.Supp.2d 1356 (2009) GREEN BULLION FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MONEY4GOLD HOLDINGS, INC., and Does 1-10, Defendants. Case No. 09-60027-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 22, 2009. *1358 Hara K. Jacobs, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff. *1359 Oliver A. R

125 Ill. App.3d 590 (1984) 466 N.E.2d 360 RONALD F. PILON, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE A. JOHNSON & SON, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant (Lockport Plastering Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee). No. 3-83-0807. Illinois Appellate Court — Third District. Opinion filed July 6, 1984. Roger D. Rickmon, of Murphy, Timm, Lennon, Spes

510 F.Supp.2d 794 (2007) LIFETIME HOMES, INC., Plaintiff, v. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION d/b/a Walker Homes, Inc., Residential Land Acquisitions, LLC, Ameriland Investments, LLC, SGD Investments LLC, Ronald C. Walker, a/k/a Ronald C.) Walker, Jr., Claire Walker Pope, and Rodney Pope, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:05cv479-FtM-33DNF. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Ft. Myers Division

ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge Architects Collective, a sole proprietorship of architect Larry Kester, brought this 'action for alleged copyright infringement against a competing architecture firm, Pucciano & English, Inc. (“Pucciano & English”). Kester, contends that Pucci-ano & English copied Kester’s federally-registered architectural plans for Unit A1 (one be

26 Ill. App.3d 342 (1975) 324 N.E.2d 684 HENRY G. DOOLEY, Adm'r of the Estate of ADELLA L. DOOLEY, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OWEN DARLING, Adm'r of the Estate of PATRICK DARLING, Deceased et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 73-398. Illinois Appellate Court — Fifth District. March 17, 1975. *343

OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge. I. This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants below. Appellant, Majid Ghaidan AlKhazraji, alleges that he, a U.S. citizen, was denied tenure at St. Francis College on account of his race, religion, and national origin. On appeal, appellant’s case is premised on Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and pendent state

784 F.2d 505 40 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 397,39 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,960, 54 USLW 2471,30 Ed. Law Rep. 1059 Majid Ghaidan AL-KHAZRAJI, a/k/a Majid Al-Khazraji Allan, Appellantv.SAINT FRANCIS COLLEGE, John Willoughby, Gervase Cain, KirkWeixel, John Coleman, Radrique Labrie, Albert Zanzuccki,Adrian Baylock, Marian Kirsch and David McMahon,individually and in their official capacities.