Cases

OPINION ERIC L. FRANK, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this individual chapter 11 bankruptcy case an unsecured creditor, has filed a “Motion for an Order Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee or Examiner or the Conversion of the Case” (“the Motion”). The debtor contests the Motion. During the course of the litigation of this contested matter, all parties ag

CORRECTED OPINION GROSS, J. We reverse an order of indirect criminal contempt for two reasons. First, the two and one-half days between the issuance of the order to show cause and the final hearing was not a “reasonable time” for preparation of a defense under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840(a). Second, the trial judge violated appellant’s privile

Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge Kenneth D. Terry (“Terry”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in a landlord-tenant dispute. Terry, the landlord in the cause, raises five points on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court erred by setting aside a default judgment. Next, Terry alleges that the trial court erred in not awarding rent for the month of August 2015 because the undisputed evidence at trial shows that the rent amount

100 S.W.3d 575 (2003) In re Zachary C. SCOTT, Relator. No. 2-01-161-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. February 27, 2003. *577 Korn, Bowdich, & Diaz, L.L.P., Andrew R. Koorn, John W. Bowdich, Dallas, for Relator. Douglas, Wuester, & Disney, Rick K. Disney, Fort Worth, for Real Parties In Interest. Panel A: D

OPINION IRENAS, Senior District Judge: Plaintiffs Government Employees Insurance Co. (“GEICO”)1 claim that Defendants — (1) Mr. Edward McMenamin and Cu-ramed, LLC; (2) Dr. Russell Abrams and Neurology Pain Associates, P.C.; and (3) Dr. Alfred Tawadrous and Primary Care & Rehabilitation, P.C.2 — conspired to commit large-scale and coordinated in

TAYLOR, J. We have for review appellant’s sentence of life imprisonment imposed pursuant to the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act (“Act”), section 775.082(8)(a)l, Florida Statutes (1997). Appellant challenges the Act’s constitutionality, arguing that the Act violates the separation of powers doctrine. The appellant further contends that he qualifies under the “extenuating circumstances” provision of the Act, and, therefore, s

On July 9, 2001 the plaintiff, while receiving physical therapy at the offices of the defendants Jonathan A. Korn and Jeffrey S. Kaplan (hereinafter the defendants), allegedly received burns to her left forearm from moist heating pads that were applied to her arm by a physical therapist who worked in the defendants’ office. On June 28, 2004 the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants, as well as the physical therapist. In

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-2014 Filed September 14, 2016 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF KAREN K. KORN AND JOHN C. KORN Upon the Petition of KAREN K. KORN, Petitioner-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, And Concerning JOHN C. KORN, Respondent-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Thomas G. Reidel

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-2713 _____________________________ JOHN H. SCOTT, Appellant, v. MELISSA M. SCOTT, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Lance M. Day, Judge. September 27, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSE

Nichols, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Korn Industries, Inc., brings this action to recover Federal income taxes of $27,618.80 for the taxable year ended November 30, 1969, plus statutory interest. We *561have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 TJ.S.C. § 1491. The question before the court is whether the taxpayer’s inclusion of th

BOWES, Judge. Defendant, John Scott, was originally charged with simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:62.-2. After a trial before a jury of twelve persons, Scott was found guilty of the lesser but included offense of unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling. Defendant appeals. The trial court ordered a pre-sentence investigation report. At the sentencing hearing, Scott w

PER CURIAM. The defendant, Roger Scott, was tried by a jury and convicted of the crime of armed robbery, for which he was sentenced to be confined in the Louisiana State Penitentiary for ten (10) years. La.R.S. 14:64. The defendant reserved and perfected one bill of exceptions based on the trial judge’s denial of his motion for a new trial. The bill of exceptions, which was taken to the overruling of a mo

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Maria Lehman alleges that her former employer, Bergmann Associates Inc., violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by creating a hostile work environment and by retaliating against her for filing charges of discrimination. She also alleges that Bergmann violated the federal Equal Pay Act and New York’s Equal P

832 N.E.2d 1108 (2005) Shirley OUTLAW, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Scott A. DANKS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lillian Outlaw, and Stevie D. Tyus, Appellees-Defendants. No. 82A01-0503-CV-112. Court of Appeals of Indiana. August 17, 2005. *1109 Jack N. VanStone, VanStone & Kornblum, Evansville, for Appellant. <

PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari, insofar as it challenges the amount of gain time awarded to petitioner by the Florida Department of Corrections, is denied on the merits. Brown v. Moore, 800 So.2d 329 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). However, we grant the petition to the extent it seeks review of the circuit court’s order that imposed a lien on petitioner’s trust account to recover circuit court filing fees for

46 So.3d 1136 (2010) Margaret M. SIDMAN, Appellant, v. Louis MARINO, III, Appellee. No. 1D10-2195. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 29, 2010. *1137 Michael J. Korn of Korn & Zehmer, P.A., Jacksonville; and Patrick J. Kilbane of Rogers Towers, P.A., Ponte Vedra Beach, for Appellant. Scott Ell

PER CURIAM. John A. Oliver, the former husband, appeals a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Mary Anne Oliver, the former wife. We affirm the final judgment, but modify one provision. The final judgment required the former husband to reimburse the former wife seventy-five percent of the cost of any medical expenses incurred by the minor or dependent children. We modify this provision to apply only to non-elective reas

PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. See Brown v. Campion, 757 So.2d 535, 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“[DJenying a plaintiffs request to proceed as indigent in a civil case does not result in irreparable harm which cannot be remedied on appeal and is therefore not reviewable by a writ of certiorari.”). BENTON, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ„ concur.

474 F.Supp.2d 501 (2007) BAY HARBOUR MANAGEMENT. LLC, Plaintiff, v. Jay CAROTHERS, Mark Scott, Coleen Colreavy, Robert Webber, Deloitte & Touche USA LLP, and "John Doe" "1"-"20", Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 2520(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 1, 2007. *502 J.L. Saffer, P.C. by Jennifer L. Saffer, Esq.,

46 So.3d 583 (2007) CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, Appellant, v. WESTLAND PARK ASSOCIATES, II, et al., Appellees. No. 1D05-5770. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. February 12, 2007. Richard A. Mullaney, General Counsel, Bruce Page, Assistant General Counsel, and Scott D. Makar, Chief, Appellate Division, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Paul M. Harden a