Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Scott Gregory Franks”
State v. Frankspublic domain
55 So.3d 34 (2010) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Gregory FRANKS, Appellant. No. 45,818-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. November 3, 2010. Rehearing Denied December 9, 2010. *35 William Nader, Shreveport, Louisiana, for Appellant. Gregory Franks, In Proper Person. Charles R. Scott,
Gregory Gabriel v. Alaska Electrical Pension Fundpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GREGORY R. GABRIEL, No. 12-35458 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:06-cv-00192- TMB ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND; TRUSTEES OF THE ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND; OPINION PENSION ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE ALASKA ELECTRI
Adoption of Gregorypublic domain
Ireland, J. This case raises the first impression question whether the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (2000), applies to the termination of parental rights proceedings. The parents appeal from a judgment of the juvenile session of the District Court dispensing with their consent to adoption of their son pursuant to G. L. c. 210, § 3. We transferred the case to this court on our own motion. The father clai
Scott v. District of Columbiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, London Davis, a child, sues by her next best friend, her mother, Alison Scott, as the survivor of her father, Derrick Davis. Davis was an inmate at Correction Corporation of Anerica’s (“CCA”) facility in Ohio (“NOCC”). He was incarcerated by the District of Columbia and shipped to the CCA facility pursuant to a contract CCA had with the District
United States v. Gregorypublic domain
Appellate Case: 20-3232 Document: 010110767996 Date Filed: 11/14/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 14, 2022
State v. Frankspublic domain
CALABRIA, Judge. Kenneth Franks ("defendant") appeals from sentences entered upon judgments for speeding 72 m.p.h. in a 55 m.p.h. zone, driving left of the center line, and impaired driving. On 15 June 2002, Trooper Clay Cogdill ("Trooper Cogdill") of the North Carolina State Highway Patrol operated a stationary VASCAR on U.S. 23 North. At approximately 6:40 p.m., Trooper Cogdill observed defendant pass him in a 19
Gregory v. Town of Veronapublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Jerry Scott Gregory filed this employment discrimination case alleging that the Town of Verona, Mississippi failed to promote him to Fire Chief because of his race. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Verona, concluding that Gregory had failed to produce sufficient evidence that Verona’s legitimate reasons for promoting another applicant were pre-textual. We affirm
United States v. Gregorypublic domain
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Donald Cipra, Shannon Gregory, and Eric Konrady (collectively, the “Defendants”) ran a cannabis grow operation at 1025 and 1027 Paw Paw Road in Lee County, Illinois for approximately two years. In February 2011, Shannon Gregory’s brother — Scott Gregory — contacted the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) and provided investigators with detailed information about’ operation. DEA Agent Chris Washburn contacted
Ralph O. Douglas v. Anson Financial, Inc., Don Bonner, and Mike Ferguson COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-05-410-CV MICHAEL SCOTT APPELLANT
Scott v. Fruehauf Corporationpublic domain
302 S.C. 364 (1990) 396 S.E.2d 354 James SCOTT, by his Guardian ad Litem, Frank A. McCLURE, Jr., Respondent v. FRUEHAUF CORPORATION and Piedmont and Southern Leasing Company, Defendants, of whom Piedmont and Southern Leasing Company is Respondent-Appellant, and of whom Fruehauf Corporation is Appellant-Respondent. 23252 Supreme Court of South Carolina. H
Scott v. Rockford Park Districtpublic domain
The plaintiffs Frank Lee Scott and Gladys Scott (the parents), *Page 854 individually and on behalf of the remaining plaintiff, their minor son Kevin Frank Scott (the son), brought this personal injury action against the defendants, Rockford Park District (the District) and the City of Rockford (the City). The plaintiffs appeal from the court's order of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm. This action arose as a result of
Roger Scott Austermiller v. Penny Smith Austermillerpublic domain
12/05/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 18, 2022 ROGER SCOTT AUSTERMILLER v. PENNY SMITH AUSTERMILLER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 20CV-49098 Deanna Bell Johnson, Chancellor
JOHNSON, GREGORY, PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 964 KA 09-02542 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGORY JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (CHRISTINE COOK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (
Ermini v. Scottpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on defendants William Murphy, Mike Scott, Robert Hamer, Richard Lisenbee, and Charlene Palmese’s' Motions for Summary *1260Judgment (Docs. ##56, 56, 59) filed on January 19 and 20, 2017. Plaintiff filed responses (Docs. #63
Jung v. City of Minneapolispublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment brought by City of Minneapolis (the “City”) (Doc. No. 16), in which the City seeks summary judgment on all claims brought against it by Plaintiff Vicki Jung (“Jung”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and d
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00211-CV ___________________________ DAVID D. SCOTT AND MARY J. SCOTT, Appellants V. ROBERT G. WEST, THYRA WEST, JUDITH C. CLARK, SALLIE CLINGMAN, GREGORY P. MILLER, GAYE MILLER, JONATHAN BAYLES, AND AMY
TAMLA PIERRE AND CHRIS * NO. 2024-CA-0236 TAYLOR * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * MYRIAD GENETICS, INC., FOURTH CIRCUIT AND GREGORY ABEL * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM
Hamilton v. Scottpublic domain
PARKER, Justice (concurring specially). Today, this Court reaffirms that the lives of unborn children are protected by Alabama’s wrongful-death statute, regardless of viability. I write separately to explain why the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973), does not bar the result we reach today and to emphasize the diminishing influence of Roe’s v
Gregory v. Commonwealthpublic domain
621 S.E.2d 162 (2005) 46 Va. App. 683 Shawn Delano GREGORY v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 0280-04-2. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. November 1, 2005. *164 Roger D. Groot (Carl C. Muzi, on briefs), for appellant. Paul C. Galanides, Assistant Attorney General (Judith Williams Jagdman