Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-25-00556-CV Build 512, LLC d/b/a Alabaster Austin and Don Anthony Villarreal, Appellants v. Scott Gunter and Julia Gunter, Appellees FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 24-2712-C395, THE HONORABLE RYAN D. LARSON, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OP

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 15, 2025 NO. 03-25-00556-CV Build 512, LLC d/b/a Alabaster Austin and Don Anthony Villarreal, Appellants v. Scott Gunter and Julia Gunter, Appellees APPEAL FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, KELLY, AND THEOFANIS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 1, 2022 NO. 03-21-00567-CV Scott D. McHenry, Appellant v. Lonnie S. Jones, Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND TRIANA DISMISSED FOR WANT OF P

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00567-CV Scott D. McHenry, Appellant v. Lonnie S. Jones, Appellee FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-21-001145, THE HONORABLE JESSICA MANGRUM, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION T

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 27, 2025 NO. 03-24-00835-CV Farrah Agahi, D.M.D; Scott Law Ortho Corp., P.C.; and Julie Avalos, Appellants v. Jeffrey Flynt, Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS, AND

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00835-CV Farrah Agahi, D.M.D; Scott Law Ortho Corp., P.C.; and Julie Avalos, Appellants v. Jeffrey Flynt, Appellee FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-24-001469, THE HONORABLE JESSICA MANGRUM, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

ORDER KATHY A. SURRATT-STATES, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the Court is the Notice and Objection to Claim # 5, the United States of America’s Response to Debtors’ Objection to Internal Revenue Service’s Proof of Claim, Brief in Support of Claim 5-1 Filed by the Internal Revenue Service, Debtors’ Brief in Support of Their Objection to Claim # 5 (5-1), Supplemental Citatio

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J., at plea; Patricia M. Nunez, J., at sentencing), rendered September 6, 2012, as amended November 19, 2012, convicting defendant of grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed. *584 Defendant’s claim that

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 16, 2010 (People v Scott, 70 AD3d 977 [2010]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 30, 2007. Ordered that the application is denied.

JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice, dissenting. Reversing course on rehearing, a majority of this panel now concludes that the *540consent requirement in subsection 21.307(a)(2) of the Texas Education Code is a jurisdictional statutory prerequisite within the meaning of section 311.034 of the Texas Government Code that requires Presidio to obtain the Commissione

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are several motions to dismiss filed by Defendant New Cingular Wireless ("New Cingular"), (Dkt. 35), Defendant ExteNet Systems, Inc. ("ExteNet"), (Dkt. 36), Defendants Greg Abbott (the "Governor") and Ken Paxton (the "attorney general"),1 (Dkt. 37), Defendant Mobilitie LLC ("Mobilitie"), (Dkt. 38), Defendant T-Mobile West LLC ("T-Mobile"), (Dkt

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the de *886 fendant Fancy Foods, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), entered April 10, 2015, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

SCOTT, J., dissenting: I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion because it extends the one-year professional services statute of limitations set forth in KRS 413.245 to acts of common theft at the expense of Kentucky citizens. Given that Appellee Austin provided only nominal services to Appellants, and considering the limited extent and non-legal nature of those services, I believe the five-year

ACCEPTED 03-16-00131-CV 13876430 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-16-00131-CV 11234617 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-16-00131-CV 13045495 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTI

ACCEPTED 03-16-00131-CV 11039488 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-16-00131-CV 12911642 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 12, 2021 NO. 03-21-00058-CV Jose Antonio Venero Lugo, Scott D. Weaver, and Venero Law, PLLC, Appellants v. Gerardo Felipe Cordova Sanchez, Appellees APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00058-CV Jose Antonio Venero Lugo, Scott D. Weaver, and Venero Law, PLLC, Appellants v. Gerardo Felipe Cordova Sanchez, Appellee FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-20-004061, THE HONORABLE MAYA GUERRA GAMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING DISSENTING OP