Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Scott A Weaver”
Weaver v. Weaverpublic domain
WALLACE, Judge. Scott Christopher Weaver (the Former Husband) appeals the final judgment that dissolved his marriage to Bethany Ann Weaver (the Former Wife). There is no cross-appeal. On appeal, the Former Husband raises three issues. First, the Former Husband argues that the trial court erred in allocating uncovered medical, vision, or dental expenses for the parties’ three minor children equally between the parties inste
Weaver v. Kirchnerpublic domain
PER CURIAM *822Mark and Linda Weaver ("the Weavers") appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Camdyn Properties, LLC, d/b/a Keller Williams West for Negligence (Count III) and Civil Conspiracy (Count IV) on the Weavers' petition for breach of a statutory duty of real estate licensee, acting as a buyer's agent, to disclose "adverse
United States v. Weaverpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Edward Weaver appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Joan M. Azrack, Judge). Weaver was convicted of conspiring to commit mail and wire fraud, substantive counts of both, and making false statements to a government agent
Holtz v. Weaverpublic domain
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Judith E. Samber, R.), entered June 13, 2011 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, denied the cross petition of Kathryn Weaver for relocation to Florida. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent-petitioner mother appeals from an order that, i
Weaver v. Myerspublic domain
WOLF, J. Appellant challenges the validity of certain 2013 amendments to the medical malpractice presuit notice sections of the Florida Statutes:' sections 766.106 and 766.1065. These amendments in pertinent part allow for presuit ex parte interviews between potential defendants and the potential claimant’s treating health care providers and require the potential claimant to sign a written waiver of federal privacy protectio
Weaver v. Harrispublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND DISMISSING CASE LOUIS GUIROLA, JR., Chief Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Ralph Paul Weaver [41] and Defendant the Director of Industry Operations for the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) [18]. After due consideration of the
People v. Weaverpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Lippman. In the early morning hours of December 21, 2005, a State Police Investigator crept underneath defendant’s street-parked van and placed a global positioning system (GPS) tracking device inside the bumper. The device remained in place for 65 days, constantly monitoring the position of the van. This nonstop surveillance was conducted without a warrant.
People v. Weaverpublic domain
Stein, J. (dissenting). The question of whether the NY Constitution prohibits constant surveillance of an individual’s whereabouts by means of a global positioning system (hereinaf*144ter GPS) device without a search warrant has far-reaching implications and has never been addressed by any appellate court of this state. While I agree that an analysis under federal law woul
United States v. Weaverpublic domain
ORDER FEUERSTEIN, District Judge: The twelve (12) count superseding indictment, filed May 1, 2013 (“Indictment”) charges defendants with various crimes in connection with their activities at Vends-tar, a company that sold vending machine business opportunities. [Docket Entry No. 39]. The charges include conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and substantive ma
United States v. Weaverpublic domain
659 F.3d 353 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard Timothy WEAVER, a/k/a Lucky; Elmer Luke Moore, a/k/a Tramp; Kim H. Berryman, a/k/a Bear; Steven Lynn Knight, a/k/a Steve O; Brian Scott Mitchell, a/k/a Kegs; Michael Lee Phelps, a/k/a AJ, Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-4885. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: September 23, 2011.
Scott v. McDonaldpublic domain
DYK, Circuit Judge. Curtis Scott appeals from the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) denying his claim for service connection for hepatitis C. We affirm. BACKGROUND Scott served on active duty for training in the United States Marine Corps Reserve from January to July 1972. O
Scott Paper Co. v. Weaverpublic domain
Leonard Weaver, Jr., sued Gary Davidson and Scott Paper Company, Inc., claiming workers' compensation benefits. The trial court entered a default judgment against Davidson. Weaver amended his complaint to allege breach of contract, claiming that he was a third-party beneficiary of a contract between Scott Paper and Davidson wherein Davidson had agreed to furnish workers' compensation insurance for his employees and to file a certificate of insurance with Scott Paper before performing
Crawford v. Weaver, Kuvin, Weaver & Lipton, P.A.public domain
PER CURIAM. Wendalyn Crawford, the plaintiff below, appeals from an order dismissing her complaint for failure to serve process on defendants within 120 days from the filing of the complaint. For the following reasons, we reverse. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j) was recently amended to provide that if a plaintiff fails to serve a defendant with process and the initial pleading within 120 days of the fil
Scott Paper Co. v. Weaverpublic domain
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to *Page 549 this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion of December 17, 1993, 634 So.2d 546 (Ala. 1993), the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consisten
Scott v. Fieldspublic domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and conversion, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated May 3, 2010, as (1) granted those branches of the motion of the defendants Stella Azie and Stella Azie, PC., which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, (2) granted the separate motion of the defendants Kecia J
Roper v. Weaverpublic domain
127 S.Ct. 2022 (2007) Don ROPER, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Petitioner, v. William WEAVER. No. 06-313. Supreme Court of United States. May 21, 2007. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General of Missouri, James R. Layton, State Solicitor, Andrea K. Spillars, Chief Counsel, Stephen D. Hawke, Alana M. Barragan-Scott, Heidi C. Doerhoff, Ronald S. Ribaud
Scott Paper Co. v. Weaverpublic domain
This is a workmen's compensation case. Scott Paper Company, Inc. (Scott), purchased a tract of timber, and in May 1989, Scott hired Gary Davidson Logging (Davidson) to cut the marked timber and to deliver *Page 544 it near the river, where it would be loaded on Scott's barge for shipment to Scott's plant in Mobile. Davidson employed Leonard Weaver as a chainsaw operator. Weaver was injured on the job in June 1989, and in November 1989, Weav
Scott v. Hickspublic domain
DON E. BURRELL, JR., P.J. - concurs NANCY STEFFEN RAHMEYER, J. - concurs
Weaver v. American Power Conversion Corp.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 195 OPINION This matter came before this Court for oral argument on October 27, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining t
Weaver v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.public domain
680 S.E.2d 668 (2009) WEAVER v. PIZZA HUT OF AMERICA, INC. et al. No. A09A0097. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 1, 2009. *669 Cash, Krugler & Fredericks, David N. Krugler, Charles A. Mathis, Jr., Altanta, for appellant. Carlock, Copeland & Stair, Scott D. Huray, Jason W. Hammer, Atlanta, for appellee.