Cases

867 F.Supp. 585 (1993) Linda P. DITTO, Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Nos. 5:91CV0722, 1:91CV1019. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 19, 1993. *586 Maurice L. Heller, Sr., Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller & McCarthy, Cleveland, OH, Joseph C. Kohn, Martin J. D'Urso, Kohn, Nast &a;

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. In this action for patent infringement, plaintiffs K&K Jump Start/Chargers, Inc., and Bonnet Enterprises (collectively “K&K”) sued defendant Schumacher Electric Corporation (“Schumacher”) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,183,407 (“the ’407 patent”). Schumacher asserted that the patent was invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) because of a prior invention and that its products did not infring

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. This is a patent infringement suit in which K & K Jump Start/Chargers, Inc., and Bonnet Enterprises, LLC (together, “K & K”) charges Schumacher Electric Corp. (“Schumacher”) with willful infringement of claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,103,-407 (“the ’407 patent”). On a motion for *983judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) filed by Schuma

37 F.3d 996 63 USLW 2290, 1994-2 Trade Cases P 70,741 ALVORD-POLK, INC.; American Blind Factory, Inc.; DeltaPaint and Wallpaper Supply Co., Inc.; Fairman Wallpaper andPaint Company; Frank R. Yocum, t/a Frank R. Yocum & SonsWallpaper Co.; Harry's Wallpaper, Inc.; Lancaster CarpetMarket, Inc.; Marvin Kolsky, t/a Headquarters Windows &Walls; Silver Wallpaper & Paint Co., Inc.; Yank

STAPLETON, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I would affirm the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the vertical conspiracy count and, accordingly, dissent from Section V of the court’s opinion. I am also unable to join all of Sections IV-A, VII-A, and VII-B. I do join the remainder of the court’s opinion. I comment only on the trade as

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1003 Filed January 9, 2025 DONALD TURNER, Petitioner/Cross Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, vs. NCI BUILDING SYSTEMS and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents/Cross Petitioners-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie Vaudt, Ju

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation [J-M] appealed from a district court judgment *238entered upon a jury verdict finding it liable for $140,000 in damages for defective pipe. We affirm. In 1977 Construction Associates, Inc., was the successful bidder to construct a water supply line for the city of Breckenridge, Minnesota. Co

333 F.Supp. 839 (1971) Richard O. BLACKWELL v. WHELESS DRILLING COMPANY. Civ. A. No. 66-582. United States District Court, E. D. Louisiana, New Orleans Division. September 27, 1971. *840 A. R. Christovich, Jr., of Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, La., for Wheless Drilling Co. George Matthews, of Lemle, Kelleher, Koh

166 F.3d 112 1999-1 Trade Cases P 72,396 In re BABY FOOD ANTITRUST LITIGATIONJacob Blinder & Sons, Inc., Wiseway Super Food Center, Inc.,Super Center, Inc., United Brothers Finer Foods, Inc., L.L.Harris Wholesale Grocery, Peter J. Schmitt & Co., 3932Church Street Supermarket, Inc., Arleen Food Products Co.,Inc., Rubin Brooks and Sons, Inc., Appellants. (D.C. CivilNo. 92-cv-05495).Ja

424 F.2d 684 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellee,v.The MOBILE DRILLING BARGE or Vessel Known As MR. CHARLIEetc., Defendant.SIGNAL OIL & GAS COMPANY et al., Third-Party Defendant-Appellants,v.OCEAN DRILLING & EXPLORATION COMPANY, Third-PartyClaimant-Appellee, ForestOil Corporation et al.,Third-Party Defendants-Appellants. No. 27827.

446 F.2d 394 Earline WHISENANT, individually and as tutrix of her minorchildren, Sheila Dianne Whisenant, et al., Plaintiffs,v.BREWSTER-BARTLE OFFSHORE COMPANY et al.,Defendants-Appellees, v. LOOMIS HYDRAULIC TESTINGCO., Inc., et al., Third PartyDefendants-Appellants. No. 31020. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 20, 1971, Rehearing a

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT AUGUST 17, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE O

Cogan, District Judge. Plaintiff SourceOne, Inc. has sued fellow dental-supplies distribution companies Patterson Companies, Inc. and Benco Dental Supply Company, accusing them of violating § 1 of the Sherman Act. SourceOne contends that defendants conducted a group boycott against SourceOne's distribution partners and pressured manufacturers and at least one individual dentist to join the boycott. SourceOne also brought various sta

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit May 4, 2020 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Christopher M. Wolpert

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT ALL STAR AWARDS & AD ) SPECIALTIES, INC., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) WD85491 ) HALO BRANDED SOLUTIONS, ) Filed: July 18, 2023 ET AL.,

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1155 Doc: 74 Filed: 06/25/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-1155 68TH STREET SITE WORK GROUP, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ALBAN TRACTOR CO., INCORPORATED; C & I LEASING INCORPORATED; RUKERT TERMINA

Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge After Defendant St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., terminated Plaintiff Herbert H. Hall from his employment, Hall initiated this lawsuit, alleging retaliation in violation of public policy. Currently before the Court is St. Jude's motion to dismiss the amended complaint. For the reasons addressed below, the motion to dismiss is granted. BACKGROUND

649 N.W.2d 859 (2002) Sandra BODAH, et al., on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. LAKEVILLE MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., Respondent. No. C5-02-276. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. August 20, 2002. *860 Alf E. Sivertson, Sivertson and Barrette, P.A., St. Paul, MN; and Thomas J. Lyons, Thomas J.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0027p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES, LTD.; WORTHINGTON │ CAMPUS, LLC,

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Evergreen Partnering Group, Inc. (“Evergreen”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing its Second Amended Complaint (“complaint”). The complaint alleges that defendants-appellees, polystyrene food service packaging manufacturers and two trade associations, refused in concert to dea