Cases

This is an appeal by defendant R. H. Herron Company from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff was injured while operating a lathe in a machine-shop owned by the appellant. While operating the lathe the plaintiff, in order to make it run faster, attempted to shift the belt by which the lathe was turned, and in doing so his left hand and arm were seriously injured. The facts of the case are fully stated by Mr. Justice Shaw

ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, Presiding Judge Alfred Joseph Cureau, Sr. (“Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s Amended Judgment/Order and Decree of Dissolution (“First Amended Judgment”) and Second Amended Judgment/Order and Decree of Dissolution (“Second Amended Judgment”). Husband claims the trial court erred in issues related to division of marital property and maintenance. We affirm as modified pursuant to Rule 84.14.

*491 ROY L. RICHTER, Judge Matthew Vacca (“Husband”) and Rita Vacca (“Wife”) both appeal from the trial court’s Judgment/Order and Decree of Dissolution. We reverse and remand. I. Background Husband and Wife met in law school in 1988 and were married in 1992

L AGE SEN, J., concurring. I join fully in the majority opinion with the understanding that its discussion of the content of the “open and notorious” element of a prescriptive easement, see 269 Or App at 796-97, is dictum. I write separately for two reasons: (1) to elaborate on why the notice concerns raised by the dissent do not provide a basis for reversing the trial court’s judg

LANDAU, J. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. *571LANDAU, J. Plaintiff seeks a prescriptive easement over an existing road that crosses defendants’ property. To establish a prescriptive easement, the l

OPINION Mary K. Hoff, Judge Kenneth J. Bialczak (Father) appeals from the judgment modifying a decree of dissolution originally entered on May 24, 2013. On May 11, 2015, the trial court *49 entered its order granting in part and denying in part the parties’ motions

ORDER Miguel Mariscal pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine and marijuana, conspiracy to possess cocaine and marijuana with the intent to distribute, and possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to 240 months’ imprisonment. Mariscal appeals, but his appointed counsel seeks to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396

ORDER Miguel Mariscal pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine and marijuana, conspiracy to possess cocaine and marijuana with the intent to distribute, and possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to 240 months’ imprisonment. Mariscal appeals, but his appointed counsel seeks to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396

No. 71 November 17, 2016 569 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON John B. WELS, Jr., Respondent on Review, v. Douglas W. HIPPE, Defendant, and Le Roy HIPPE and Cheryl Hippe, Petitioners on Review. (CC 101215E3; CA

08/23/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 9, 2021 Session RARITY BAY PARTNERS v. RARITY BAY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Monroe County No. 21-173 Jerri Bryant, Chancellor _________

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Pioneer Construction Co., Inc., : Eastern Alliance Insurance Company, : and Employers Alliance, Inc. : : v. : : Insight Pharmaceuticals, LLC : d/b/a Insight Pharmacy, : No. 867 C.D. 2022 Appell

FOURTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, P. J., WATKINS and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk's office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2366 K.C., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States

Smith, J. — Petitioners Isaac Donald Sweet and Robert *469James Slaton seek review of decisions of the Court of Appeals, Division Two, which affirmed decisions of the Pierce County Superior Court denying merger of their convictions for first-degree assault with their convictions for first-degree burglary. Petitioner Sweet also raises additional issues. We consolidated the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2366 K.C., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2366 K.C., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2366 K.C., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States

622 F.Supp.2d 1062 (2009) Glen LLEWELLYN, Plaintiff, v. SHEARSON FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC., Allstate Home Loans, Inc. dba Allstate Funding, Equity Pacific Mortgage, Inc., Kevin E. Rider, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC., Nomura Credit and Capital, Inc., NCC Servicing, LLC., and Castle, Meinhold & Stawiarski, LLC., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-cv-00179-MSK-KLM. United States District Court, D. Colorado.<

980 P.2d 1223 (1999) 138 Wash.2d 466 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Isaac Donald SWEET, Petitioner. State of Washington, Respondent, v. Robert James Slaton, Petitioner. Nos. 67136-2, 67377-2. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued June 8, 1999. Decided July 15, 1999. *1225<

366 N.W.2d 788 (1985) PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Norwich Union Fire Society, Ltd., Royal Insurance Office, and Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Clayton E. RUNCK, Jr. and Herman Sobania, Defendants and Appellants, George Schulz, Defendant. Civ. No. 10596. Supreme Court of North Dakota. April 17, 1985.