Cases

Dolan, P.J. Thisisanappealinwhichtheappellantdidnotfollowprocedural requirements. As a result, the information available to this division is limited. Pursuantto Dist/Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 64(f), the plaintiff should have filed with the clerk of the trial court five (5) copies of the report as allowed and five (5) copies of his brief. The plaintiff did not file the copies of the report. Consequently, there were no copies of t

The opinion of the court was delivered by Blanchard, J. The question the ease propounds for determination is, the constitutionality vel non of Act 89 of the Acts of 1900. *562The title of this statute is “An Act to provide a Civil Service for the City of New Orleans, to repeal all acts inconsistent or in conflict t

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2022 ME 17 Docket: Kno-21-56 Argued: November 3, 2021 Decided: March 15, 2022 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. Majority: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, GORMAN, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. Dissent: JABAR, J. KAREN S. KLEIN v.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE VANMETER Ronald King appeals as a matter of right from his conviction by jury and life sentence arising from charges of two counts of first-degree sodomy, and two counts of first-degree sexual abuse. Because the jury instructions on the sexual abuse counts violated the unanimity requirement, we reverse and remand King's sexual abuse convictions. On remand, we also direct the trial court to address the

871 P.2d 1135 (1994) KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH, Appellant, v. PORT GRAHAM CORPORATION, Appellee. No. S-4910. Supreme Court of Alaska. April 8, 1994. *1136 Gerald L. Sharp, Preston, Thorgrimson, Shidler, Gates & Ellis, Anchorage, for appellant. Samuel J. Fortier, Fortier & Mikko, P.C., Anchorage, for appellee.

SEVERSON, Justice. [¶ 1.] Over a period of two years, the City of Sioux Falls issued Daniel Daily four citations for a concrete extension to his driveway. Daily appealed each of the citations, but a hearing was held only on the final two citations he received. The hearing examiner upheld the final two citations. Daily then initiated this declaratory judgment action against the Ci

OPINION AND ORDER JOAN HUMPHREY LEFKOW, United States District Judge Velma Cooksey filed a two-count complaint against the Board of Education of the City of Chicago (“CPS”) alleging age discrimination and retaliation while employed as principal of Wadsworth School (“Wadsworth”), in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“the ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621

50 Cal.4th 512 (2010) 113 Cal. Rptr. 3d 327 235 P.3d 988 BRIAN REID, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant and Respondent. No. S158965. Supreme Court of California. August 5, 2010. *515 Duane Morris, Barry L. Bunshoft, Ray L. Wong, Paul J. Killion, Lorraine P. Ocheltre

257 B.R. 600 (2000) NI FUEL COMPANY, INC., f/k/a Nipsco Fuel Company, Inc., individually and on behalf of Bristol Resources Production Company, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. Stephen E. JACKSON, individually and as trustee of the Stephen E. Jackson Trust; Stephen J. Heyman; John Michael Cherry, individually and as trustee of the John Michael Cherry Living Trust, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-385-BU(J). United S

498 F.Supp.2d 242 (2007) C & E SERVICES, INC. and Carl L. Biggs, Plaintiffs, v. ASHLAND, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 03-1857 (EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 2, 2007. *243 *244 *245 *2

Tamkin, J. This is an action of contract, instituted by writ dated June 5, 1973 and returnable on July 2, 1973, to recover $33,245.37 for rent. On June 5, 1973, defendant’s real estate in the County of Norfolk was attached. On June 14, 1973, a deputy sheriff made a chip attachment of the defendant corporation’s property and summoned it to appear and answer at court by leaving two summons and two attested copies of the writ togeth

856 S.W.2d 453 (1993) Leonard WOODBERRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 07-92-0286-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. April 16, 1993. Opinion Overruling Motion for Rehearing July 1, 1993. *454 Ron Hance, Lubbock, for appellant. Lubbock County Dist. Attorney's Office, Travis W. Ware,

623 A.2d 150 (1993) Stephen HAWORTH v. Lee FEIGON, et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued January 5, 1993. Decided April 6, 1993. *155 Mark S. Kierstead (orally), Waterville, for plaintiff. Robert E. Sandy, Jr. (orally), Sherman, Sandy & Lee, Waterville, for defendants. Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS,

239 F.Supp.2d 153 (2003) Ventura Tirado ARCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.99-1955 RLA. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 10, 2003. *156 José Durand-Carrasquillo, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. *157 Beatriz M. Rodríguez-Burgo

206 Wis.2d 509 (1996) 557 N.W.2d 457 Robert E. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. David, J. PETERS, individually, and Peters Service Center, Inc., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Counter Defendants-Fifth-Party Plaintiffs-Sixth Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carl KLEMM, INC., D/B/A Klemm Tanklines, a Wisconsin Corporation, Third Party Defendant-Fourth Party Plaintiff-Counter-Plaintiff,[†] GR

BEAM, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom BOWMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, join, and with whom MAGILL, Circuit Judge, joins as to Parts II C and D. After considering this case four times, this court now affirms two separate $4,000,000 punitive damage awards arising from a single compensable injury. I dissent. Without serious contradiction from any party or any judge involved in this case,

46 B.R. 405 (1984) In re INTERNATIONAL RESORTS, INC., Bankrupt. CLEAR CREEK, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROYAL AMERICAN CORPORATION, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 78-A-0911-E. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama. January 19, 1984. *406 *407 Edward W. Harwell, Anniston, Ala., Trustee. Charle

BEER, Judge. At issue in this appeal is the single question: Was plaintiff-appellee, Marian Inez Donellan (now wife of Sidney A. Gauth-reaux) adopted by decedent Joseph Patrick Donellan ? This matter was previously before us in a status that precluded our ruling on this important point. Now an evidentiary hearing has taken place and the trial court has decreed that Mrs. Gauthreaux is the adopted daughter

91 So.2d 591 (1956) 231 La. 430 Bessie BORNE, Wife of Alexander FOUQUIER v. Alexander FOUQUIER. No. 42370. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 26, 1956. On Rehearing November 5, 1956. *592 Blanchard & Blanchard, C. A. Blanchard, Donaldsonville, for appellant. Harold L. Molaison, R

130 So.2d 529 (1961) Albert E. FOSSIER, M.D. v. AMERICAN PRINTING CO., LTD., and Stuart O. Landry. No. 100. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 15, 1961. Rehearing Denied June 12, 1961. *530 Bernard, Micholet & Cassisa and Edward J. Villere, New Orleans, for plaintiff and appellant. Monro