Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Satwant Singh”
Leach, J. — ¶1 Satwant Singh and Dhaliwal Real Estate LLC (collectively Singh) appeal the trial court’s summary dismissal of their lawsuit against the Covington Water District (District). Singh and the District executed two system extension agreements to supply water to Singh’s residential real estate development. Singh challenges provisions in the agreements making connection charg
Bagri v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Satwant Singh Bagri, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the summary affirmance by the Board of Im*630migration Appeals (BIA) of the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ), denying his petition for asylum and withholding of deportation. We deny the petition for review. DISCUSSION
Garcha v. City of Beaconpublic domain
351 F.Supp.2d 213 (2005) Satwant Singh GARCHA, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF BEACON, et al, Defendants. No. 04 CIV.5981(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 3, 2005. *214 Satwant Singh Garcha, Plaintiff Pro Se, Beacon, NY. Mark J. Volpi, Esq., Ruffo Tabora Mainello and McKay, P.C., Lake Success, NY.
Sood v. Singhpublic domain
Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; Paul G. Alexander, Chancellor. Before ROY NOBLE LEE, P.J., and DAN M. LEE and PRATHER, JJ. AFFIRMED.
Garcha v. City of Beaconpublic domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 USC § 1983, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated September 29, 2005, which granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. <
Dhillon v. Mukaseypublic domain
*470MEMORANDUM ** The facts and procedural posture of this case are familiar to the parties and we do not repeat them here. Petitioners appeal the revocation of their grants of asylum. Petitioners argue that (1) the immigration judge (“IJ”) lacked jurisdiction to reopen proceedings because they had adjustment of status applications pending before a De
Armedilla v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Rodrigo Ilaw Armedilla, native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order sustaining the government’s *154appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting his application under 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4)(B) for a waiver of the requirement to file a joint petition with his for
Armedilla v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Rodrigo Ilaw Armedilla, native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order sustaining the government’s *154appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting his application under 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4)(B) for a waiver of the requirement to file a joint petition with his for
Dhillon v. Mukaseypublic domain
*470MEMORANDUM ** The facts and procedural posture of this case are familiar to the parties and we do not repeat them here. Petitioners appeal the revocation of their grants of asylum. Petitioners argue that (1) the immigration judge (“IJ”) lacked jurisdiction to reopen proceedings because they had adjustment of status applications pending before a De
Garcha v. City Courtpublic domain
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, purportedly to reverse a judgment of the City Court of the City of Beacon (Timothy G. Pagones, J.), rendered October 26, 2004, convicting the petitioner of one count of unlawfully failing to obey a traffic-control device in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1110 (a) and § 1111 (d) (1), the petitioner appeals from judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated July 18, 2005,
Kozlova v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Tatiana Kozlova appeals on behalf of herself and her two children, Alexei Zhouk and Anastasia Zhouk, from the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of her application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition in part, and deny it in part. Whether or not admission of the prehearing statement was
PetMed Express, Inc. v. MedPets.Com, Inc.public domain
336 F.Supp.2d 1213 (2004) PETMED EXPRESS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. MEDPETS.COM, INC. and Satwant Singh, Defendants. No. 03-62019-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 28, 2004. *1214 *1215 *1216 Kevin P. Jacobs and Francisco Sanchez of Homer &am;
Sidhu v. Ashcroftpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Charanjit Sidhu, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a May 29, 2003, order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her motion to reconsider1 the Board’s December 17, 2002, order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s denial of her application for asylum and withholding of removal. Sidhu’s brief argues only that
Singh v. Holderpublic domain
658 F.3d 879 (2011) Hoshiyar SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 07-70500. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 2011. Filed July 21, 2011. *882 Robert B. Jobe (argued), Lina Baroudi, Law Office of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for
Garcha v. City of Beaconpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Satwant Singh Garcha, proceeding pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McMahon, J.), dismissing his complaint sua sponte. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the procedural history, facts, and issues on appeal. We hold that the district court, in its order dated April 19, 2006, proper
Raleigh v. Rampublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Roda Ram and Satwant Singh appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated August 4, 2008, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Ordered that the order is rever
Teja v. Saranpublic domain
Mohinder Singh Teja appeals an adverse judgment, alleging as error the trial court's refusal to disqualify the respondent's attorney on the basis of a conflict of interest. We find that a conflict existed, but affirm the judgment. Teja was a former client of the respondent's attorney, Satwat Singh Pandher. Teja was jailed on a domestic violence charge in January 1988. During Teja's confinement, he consulted and retained Pandher to represent him in that action. Pandher also repr
Janda v. Madera Community Hospitalpublic domain
16 F.Supp.2d 1181 (1998) John P.S. JANDA, M.D., Plaintiff, v. MADERA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Robert C. Kelley, Ronald Castonguay, M.D., Mohammad Arain, M.D., Kenneth Bernstein, M.D., Kanwal J. Singh, M.D., David B. Kaye, M.D., Theodore Nassar, M.D., Satwant Samrao, M.D., Louis Hernandez, M.D., David Berry, Anna Dasilva and Georgia Baker, Defendants. No. CV-F-98-5021 OWW DLB. United States District Court, E
Government Employees Insurance v. Annamanthadoopublic domain
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, or, alternatively, to direct that Karen Annamanthadoo and Dylawatie Bharat provide the petitioner with medical authorizations and copies of all relevant medical records in their possession, and to submit to physical examinations before the arbitration, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated November 27, 200