Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sarah Lee Brown”
Brown v. Hookpublic domain
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 13th of March 2018 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th of March 2018."
Lee v. Christianpublic domain
ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, CHIEF JUDGE Presently before the Court is Defendant Harold Paul Christian’s (“Christian”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 68). Further, Defendants Carl Boyette (“Boy-ette”), Tommy Lowman (“Lowman”), and Mayor Tom Davis (“Davis”) have filed a joint Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 69). The motions have been fully briefed and are ripe for decision. For the reasons state
Walro v. Lee Group Holding Co. (In re Lee)public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JEFFREY J. GRAHAM, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Michael J. Walro’s (the “Trustee”) Motion for Summary Judgment on his Complaint against The Lee Group Holding Company, LLC (the “Lee Group”), Lester L. Lee (“Debtor”), Brenda R. Lee, Debra Jo Brown, Melinda Gabbard and Larry L. Lee and on the [Cross-JMo
Lee v. Christianpublic domain
ORDER LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief Judge. All of the Defendants, except Harold Christian, have filed Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs Original and Amended Complaints. Dkt. Nos. 10, 14, 27, 29. It is those' Motions that are before the Court presently. Upon due consideration, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are DENIED. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Deborah Lee wo
Salsman v. Brownpublic domain
*893OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: Appellants, Ronald Brown and his wife, Sarah Brown (the Browns), appeal from the order granting a petition to enforce settlement agreement filed by Ap-pellees, Joanne Gail Salsman, executrix of the estate of Vera Salsman, and Douglas Howard Salsman (the Salsmans). Upon review, we reverse and remand for proceedings consis
State v. Brownpublic domain
280 Kan. 65 (2005) STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ERIC BROWN, Appellant. No. 91,727. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed September 9, 2005. Sarah Ellen Johnson, assistant appellate defender, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. *66 Lee J. Davison, assistant attorney general, argued the cause
Se. Pain Specialists, P.C. v. Brownpublic domain
Peterson, Justice. *362These companion appeals raise questions about when a jury considering a medical malpractice case might also be instructed on issues of ordinary negligence. Sterling Brown Sr. sued the defendants individually and on behalf of his wife, Gwendolyn Lynette Brown, after she suffered catastrophic brain damage, allegedly from
WARD & LEE, P.L.C. v. CITY OF CLAREMOREpublic domain
ROBERT D. BELL, Judge. T1 Plaintif{/Appellant, the law firm of Ward & Lee, P.L.C., appeals from the trial court's order denying the firm's petition for declaratory relief brought pursuant to the Oklahoma Open Records Act, 51 0.98.2011 § 24A.1 et seq. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL
Perry v. Brownpublic domain
*1154ORDER Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472
Perry v. Brownpublic domain
671 F.3d 1052 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State
Trevor Adamson v. Sarah E. Grovepublic domain
11/30/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 17, 2022 Session TREVOR ADAMSON v. SARAH E. GROVE, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumner County No. 83CC1-2020-CV-906, 83CC1-2020-CV-616, 83CC1-2020-CV-818 Joe Thompson, Judge
Sarah Jenkins v. Kyle C. Keownpublic domain
Doyle, Presiding Judge. Following an automobile collision, Sarah Jenkins and her adult daughter, Regina Jenkins, sued the other driver, Kyle Keown, who allegedly rear-ended their vehicle, injuring them. After voluntarily dismissing that action, the Jenkinses filed the instant case as a renewal action. GEICO Indemnity Company, the alleged uninsured motorist carrier for Sarah, filed an an
Lee v. Ohio Educ. Ass'npublic domain
JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *981Pending before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by 1) Defendants Craig Zimpher, Aaron Schmidt, and Richard Lumpe (Doc. 35); 2) Avon Lake City School District (Doc. 36); and 3) Avon Lake Education Association, National Education Association, and Ohio Education Association (collectively
Estate of Stuckey v. Brownpublic domain
OPINION ON APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR REHEARING OR FOR CLARIFICATION AND APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC WOLF, Judge. Appellee’s motion for rehearing and motion for rehearing en banc are denied. The motion for clarification is granted to the extent that we clarify our reasoning for reversing the trial court’s order granting a new trial. Appellees assert that this court has applied a
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-01758-COA SARAH ELIZABETH DOMKE (CHAMPLIN) APPELLANT v. ROBERT EDWARD DOMKE III APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/26/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHNNY LEE WILLIAMS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAMAR COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR
Lee Ardrey Harris v. Alena Marie Allenpublic domain
01/11/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 19, 2023 LEE ARDREY HARRIS V. ALENA MARIE ALLEN Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-23-0389 JoeDae L. Jenkins, Chancellor No. W2023-01794-COA-T10B-CV The
Stockton v. Brownpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN STOCKTON; RICHARD No. 24-3777 EGGLESTON, MD; THOMAS T. D.C. No. SILER, MD; DANIEL MOYNIHAN, 2:24-cv-00071- MD; CHILDREN’S HEALTH TOR DEFENSE, not-for-profit corporation; JOHN AND JANE DOES, MDs 1
Sarah Speed v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.public domain
GILMAN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which GRIFFIN, J., joined and STRANCH, J., joined in part. STRANCH, J. (pp. 407-15), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. These seven consolidated cases are among the many that have been filed nationwide against the manufacturers of both the prescription drug Regl
LEE v. BUENOpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:LEE v. BUENO OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets Leg
Misun Lee v. Radpublic domain
In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), entered October 16, 2014, as granted the separate motions of the defendants Cyrus K. Rad and Kayhan Sarab pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them for failure to prosecute. <