Cases

Cite as: 565 U. S. ____ (2012) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the

GRIFFIS, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. The Chancery Court of Madison County granted Randy Archie Springer’s complaint for adverse possession and to confirm and quiet title and denied Charles E. Stasher and Sarah Eula Stasher’s counterclaim to remove cloud on title and to quiet and confirm title by adverse possession.

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves the shifting legal landscape under the Voting Rights Act and its impact on Plaintiffs’ entitlement to attorneys’ fees. Leading up to the 2012 state Senate elections in Texas, Texas failed to gain preclearance of its recently enacted Senate redistricting plan as required under then-existing law. Because Texas’s new plan had

*1154ORDER Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472

671 F.3d 1052 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State

719 N.W.2d 804 (2006) Walter Norman KISTLER and Jean Ann Kistler, Appellants, v. CITY OF PERRY, Iowa, Appellee. No. 04-1459. Supreme Court of Iowa. August 11, 2006. Stephen V. Nielsen of Skinner & Nielsen, P.L.C. West Des Moines, for appellants. *805 Sarah M. Kouri and William L. Dawe III of Hopkins & Huebner, P.C.

675 F.3d 832 (2012) M.D., by next friend Sarah R. STUKENBERG; D.I., by next friend Nancy G. Pofahl; Z.H., by next friend Carla B. Morrison; S.A., by next friend Javier Solis; A.M., by next friend Jennifer Talley; J.S., by next friend Anna J. Ricker; K.E., by next friend John W. Cliff, Jr.; D.P., by next friend Karen J. Langsley; T.C., by next friend Paul Swacina, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Rick PERRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the Sta

Opinion NEEDHAM, J. Sarah Morrison appeals from a postjudgment order denying her motion for attorney fees under Civil Code section 1942.5 and Government Code section 12989.2 after the parties had resolved their dispute by settlement. We will affirm the order. *1257I. Facts and Procedural History On Januar

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SARAH PETERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-1207-BWD ) GRACE PETERSON, ) ) Defendant. )

[Cite as State v. Perry, 2021-Ohio-1748.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WOOD COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WD-20-025 Appellee Trial Court No. 2019CR0278 v. Keith B. Perry, III DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

POLSTON, J. We review the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch, 133 So.3d 1008, 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014), in which the Fourth District certified conflict with the decisions of the Second District in Irwin v. Irwin, 857 So.2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), and the Third District in Valdes v. Val

[Cite as State v. Perry, 2022-Ohio-2132.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 110764 and 110954 v. : DAVEION PERRY,

[Cite as State v. Perry, 2023-Ohio-3883.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 112548 v. : DAVEION PERRY, :

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1408 (Filed: 10 February 2025) ************************************** SARAH E. PRICE, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, *

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS John P., Petitioner Below, Petitioner FILED September 5, 2017 vs) No. 16-0602 (Tucker County 14-D-16) RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS In Re: The Marriage of: FILED October 13, 2017 Guy L. Brown II, RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK S

STRINE, Chief Justice: In this appraisal proceeding involving a publicly traded payday lending firm purchased by a private equity firm, the respondent argues that we should establish, by judicial gloss, a presumption that in certain cases involving arm’s-length mergers, the price of the transaction giving rise to appraisal rights is the best estimate of fair value. We decline to

ORDER REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. Shortly before the hearing of this appeal, the defendants-intervenors-appellants (“Proponents”) requested that I recuse myself under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and § 455(b)(5)(ni). Under § 455(a), I must recuse myself if “a reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts would conclude that [my] impartiality might reasonably be q

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY, May 5, 2017 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK Employer Below, Petitioner SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED August 11, 2016 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SARAH K. RHODES, SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS