Cases

OSCN Found Document:MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCS OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

688 F.Supp.2d 980 (2010) Harry COTA; Gilda Garcia; Allie Jo Woodard, by her guardian ad litem Linda Gaspard-Berry; Harry Cota; Sumi Konrai by her guardian ad litem Casey Konrai; Ronald Bell by his guardian ad litem Rozene Dilworth, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. David MAXWELL-JOLLY, Director of the Department of Health Care Services, State of California, Department of Health Care Services, Defendants.</

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1409 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK, by his next friends and parents; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM SILVAINE, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HEALTH PLAN FOR TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLO

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1409 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK, by his next friends and parents; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM SILVAINE, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HEALTH PLAN FOR TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLO

22-1426-cr United States v. Maxwell In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2023 No. 22-1426-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, also known as Sealed Defendant 1,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10416 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:16-cr-08202- ROS-1 SARAH MELISA COX, AKA Sarah Cox, AKA Sarah Cunningham, Defendant-Appellant.

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D23-0750 LT Case No. 2020-31188-CICI _____________________________ CAROL ANN KULZER, Appellant, v. SARAH MARIE WAY and GREENLEAF TRUST, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. Mary G. Jolley, Judge. Michael J. Korn, of Ko

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1721 Doc: 130 Filed: 04/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 147 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1721 MAXWELL KADEL; JASON FLECK; CONNOR THONEN-FLECK; JULIA MCKEOWN; MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR.; C.B., by his next friends and parents; SAM

NO. 12-22-00065-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS SARAH MICHELLE DEMARET, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEX

Judgment rendered August 11, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,022-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** J. PATTON MABRAY, JR.

OSCN Found Document:MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCS OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Maurice Maxwell was charged with possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine. The analyst from the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory who originally tested the substance seized from Maxwell retired before trial, so the government offered the testimony of his co-worker instead. The co-worker did not personally analyze the substance herself, but conclu

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) ECCI-C METAG, JV ) ASBCA Nos. 58833, 58863, 59029 ) 59031, 59672, 60413 ) Under Contract No. W5J9JE-10-D-0007 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael A. Richard, Esq.

253 S.W.3d 309 (2008) Kenneth J. MAXWELL, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-05-248-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. March 13, 2008. *312 David L. Richards, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Tim Curry, Crim. Dist. Atty., Charles M. Mallin, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., Chief of Appellate Section, Sylvia Mandel and

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) ECCI-C METAG, JV ) ASBCA Nos. 58980, 59027, 60414 ) Under Contract No. W5J9JE-10-D-0007 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Casey J. McKinnon, Esq. Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC Wa

PER CURIAM. Inmates Robert Maxwell and Princess Smith appeal the district court’s1 dismissal *700of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit following an evidentiary hearing. Upon careful review of the record and of appellants’ arguments, see Choate v. Lockhart, 7 F.3d 1370, 1373 & n. 1 (8th Cir.1993) (reviewing factual findings for cle

[Cite as State v. Maxwell, 2026-Ohio-1961.] IN THE OHIO COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STARK COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO Case No. 2025CA00124 Plaintiff - Appellee Opinion and Judgment Entry -vs- Appeal from the Stark County Court of

572 Submitted March 29, reversed June 30, 2021 In the Matter of B. D., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. W., Appellant. Douglas County Circuit Court 16JU07326; Petition Number 1600312;

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 254.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MAXWELL, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Maxwell, 2002-Ohio-2121.] Criminal law—Sex offenses—Pandering obscenity involving a minor—Proper reading of R.C. 2907.321(A)(6) demonstrates the clear intent of the General Assembly to impose strict liability on the act of bringing child pornography into the state—R.C. 2907.321, cons

Moyer, C.J. {¶ 1} Responding to information regarding a thirteen-yeaf-old girl named Sarah, officers of the Worthington Police Department on August 20,1998, learned that appellee Mark W. Maxwell had contacted Sarah via the Internet and that she had agreed to meet him at a store in Worthington that afternoon. Sarah disclosed to the police officers that she and appellee, who had identified himself as a nineteen-year-old male,