Cases

Damien Gary Clark v. State of Maryland, No. 25, September Term, 2022 RIGHT TO COUNSEL – NO-COMMUNICATION ORDER – ACTUAL DENIAL OF ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – PREJUDICE – Supreme Court of Maryland* held that trial counsel’s failure to object to trial court’s order prohibiting communication between defendant and counsel during overnight recess in criminal trial, without any curative action, resulted in actual denial of assistance of counsel in violation of Sixth Amendment to United States Constitutio

Damien Gary Clark v. State of Maryland, No. 25, September Term, 2022 RIGHT TO COUNSEL – NO-COMMUNICATION ORDER – ACTUAL DENIAL OF ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – PREJUDICE – Supreme Court of Maryland* held that trial counsel’s failure to object to trial court’s order prohibiting communication between defendant and counsel during overnight recess in criminal trial, without any curative action, resulted in actual denial of assistance of counsel in violation of Sixth Amendment to United States Constitutio

Damien Gary Clark v. State of Maryland, No. 25, September Term, 2022 RIGHT TO COUNSEL – NO-COMMUNICATION ORDER – ACTUAL DENIAL OF ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – PREJUDICE – Supreme Court of Maryland* held that trial counsel’s failure to object to trial court’s order prohibiting communication between defendant and counsel during overnight recess in criminal trial, without any curative action, resulted in actual denial of assistance of counsel in violation of Sixth Amendment to United States Constitutio

HOTTEN, J. On June 30, 2010, William Siam Simpson, III, appellant, was indicted in connection with three incidents of arson occurring on November 15, 2009, April 4, 2010, and May 16, 2010. Specifically, those offenses included the following counts: (a) two counts of first-degree arson;1 (b) one count of second degree arson;2 (c) one count of first-degree burglary;

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge I. . INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND In 1995, Deon Patrick was convicted in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, of two counts of murder, two counts of home, invasion, and one count of armed robbery. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. [First Amended Complaint, Dkt

ACCEPTED 04-15-00474-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/28/2015 4:51:49 PM

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Clinton Howard, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas *810 corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 1 He argues that, during tw

The opinion of the court was delivered by KLEINER, J.A.D. Defendant appeals from his conviction of the purposeful and knowing murder of his wife. Defendant’s previous conviction for this same crime resulted in a reversal on appeal and a remand for a new trial. On this second appeal, defendant raises the following points of error: I. THE TRIAL COURT IMPOSED

126 N.J. 112 (1991) 594 A.2d 232 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL ERAZO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued January 29, 1991. Decided August 8, 1991. *116 Michael A. Priarone and Michele A. Adubato, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appella

13 F.3d 711 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 177 UNITED STATES of Americav.James PRICE, a/k/a "Squeezie," James Price, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Reginald REAVES, a/k/a "Reggie," a/k/a "R," Reginald Reaves,Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Joseph COBB, a/k/a "Gump," Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Leroy JACKSON, a/k/a "Skip," Leroy Jackson, Appellant.UNITED STATES

J.A.B. v. J.E.D.B., Case No. 519, September Term 2020. Opinion filed on April 27, 2021, by Berger, J. CHILD CUSTODY – GROUNDS AND FACTORS IN GENERAL – FACTORS RELATING TO PARTIES SEEKING CUSTODY – ABUSE OF PERSON OTHER THAN CHILD – COMMISSION OF CRIME – WELFARE AND BEST INTERESTS OF CHILD Where a trial court expressly finds that Mother was subjected to abuse by Father, the court is required to consider Md. Code Ann., § 9-101.1 of the Family Law Article in its custody determination. The trial c

OPINION BY LAZARUS, J.: James Lorenzo Brown appeals from his judgment of sentence, entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, after a jury convicted him of robbery 1 and possessing instruments of crime ("PIC"), 2 and the trial court convicted him of p

Easterly, Associate Judge, concurring in the judgment and joining in Parts I, III, and IV: At the time Michael Jones was shot and killed, there were people around him shooting guns at each other.1 Bernard J. Fleming may have been one of the individuals shooting at Mr. Jones and his companions. No witness ever saw and no vid*1185

In re: T.K., No. 60, September Term, 2021. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – CHILD IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE – REQUIREMENTS FOR EXERCISE OF DISCRETION UNDER COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS § 3-819(E). A juvenile court has discretion to award custody under § 3-819(e) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article if the juvenile court, by a preponderance of the evidence: (a) sustains allegations in a CINA petition that are sufficient to support a CINA disposition against one, but only one, parent; and (b)

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 12-CM-523 LEE CARRELL, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE.

SMITH, District Judge. Paul James Hansen was convicted after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts for his role in stealing a minivan and his responsibility for the armed robbery and killing that followed. He now appeals both his conviction and sentence, bringing no less than eleven claims of error. After careful review, we affirm. <

*581OPINION WENDY BEETLESTONE, DISTRICT JUDGE. This action arises out of incidents in May 2014, when Defendant Resultly, LLC (“Resultly”), in its efforts to earn commissions through Defendant VigLink, Inc.’s (“VigLink”) participation in QVC’s marketing affiliate program, crawled QVC’s website in a manner that QVC alleges overloaded its servers and ren

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KIM R. GIBSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction This matter comes before the Court upon cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (ECF No. 44) and Plaintiff Melody Stoops (ECF No. 56). These matters have been fully briefed (see ECF Nos. 44, 54, 55, 56, 61, 64, 65, 67, 68, 70, 76, 77) and are ripe for dispositio

718 A.2d 648 (1998) 123 Md. App. 363 BROADCAST EQUITIES, INC. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland et al. No. 1861, Sept. Term, 1997. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. October 2, 1998. *651 David N. Ventker (John C. Lynch and Huff, Poole & MaHoney, P.C., on the brief), Virginia Beach, VA, for appellant.<

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 12-CM-523 LEE CARRELL, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE.