⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Santiago v. Transportation”

District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014-09-25 · Published · cited 10× · 50 F. Supp. 3d 136
RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge. Plaintiff Samuel Santiago, an employee of the Connecticut Department of Transportation (“DOT”), alleges that Defendants, employees of the DOT, interfered with his rights by denying him leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and retaliated against him for exercising his rights under the FMLA by placing him on u
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012-08-14 · Published · cited 0× · 51 A.3d 181; 616 Pa. 546; 2012 WL 3290146; 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1791
ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 14th day of August 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED based on this Court’s decision in Mohamed v. PennDOT, 40 A.3d 1186 (Pa.2012).
Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2025-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I ALISHEANN SANTIAGO- CERTIORARI COLL; INA COLL procedente del Tribunal VÁZQUEZ; FRANCHESKA de Primera Instancia, ANAIS GONZÁLEZ COLL, Sala Superior de
Gilbert v. Santiagopublic domain
Superior Court of Delaware · 2025-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN R. GILBERT, JR., LEONA ) CRAVENS, and WOODROW ) GILBERT, by and through his ) Guardian Ad Litem, Leona Cravens, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) C.A. No. K23C-08-004 RLG RAMON E. SANTIAGO, PEAK ) PROPERTY AND CASUALTY ) INSURANCE CORPORATION, a ) Wisconsin corporation, NG
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-04-26 · Published · cited 21× · 294 A.3d 482; 2023 Pa. Super. 71
J-S38037-22 2023 PA Super 71 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA v. : : WILFREDO SANTIAGO : : Appellant : No. 940 EDA 2022 Appeal from t
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016-01-25 · Published · cited 26× · 811 F.3d 67; 2016 WL 285742
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Sheila Reyes-Orta alleges that she was stripped of various job duties and was ultimately terminated from her job at the Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority (“PRHTA”) because of her affiliation with the Popular Democratic Party (“PDP”). After striking certain exhibits, the district court granted summary judgment against her on her Firs
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011-12-23 · Published · cited 28× · 664 F.3d 792; 2011 WL 6739416
McKAY, Circuit Judge. This case comes to us on appeal for the second time and still involves a dispute over payment for transcripts of proceedings in the underlying case. After this court held that Appellant Jennifer Bean had no right to be paid for transcripts that Appellee Paul Livingston, attorney for the plaintiffs in the underlying action, did not order or obtain from her,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015-07-29 · Published · cited 6× · 795 F.3d 230; 2015 WL 4560122
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. The question presented is whether plaintiff Sonia Vélez-Vélez’s political discrimination claim was timely brought within the one-year statute of limitations for such 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions filed in Puerto Rico. We agree with the district court that the logic of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Delaware State College v. Ricks, 449 U.S.
Santiago v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2018-03-27 · Published · cited 5× · 181 A.3d 796; 458 Md. 140
Argued before Barbera, C.J., Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ. Getty, J. *798 **143 In this case, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred in
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024-08-19 · Published · cited 16× · 114 F.4th 1212
USCA11 Case: 22-12335 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 08/19/2024 Page: 1 of 36 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12335 ____________________ TAXINET CORP., a South Dakota corpo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-07-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT ISAK VAZQUEZ-SANTIAGO, : No. 54 MAL 2022 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-04-02 · Published · cited 39× · 2020 Ohio 1274
[Cite as State v. Flores Santiago, 2020-Ohio-1274.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108458 v. : ARCADIO FLORES-SANTIAGO,
Santiago v. Ricciopublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991-02-21 · Published · cited 1× · 170 A.D.2d 340
Order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.), entered March 15, 1990, which granted the petition to compel respondent to suspend alternate side of the street parking regulations on March 17, 1990, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the petition dismissed, without costs. At issue on this appeal is whether respondent properly declined petitioners’ request that regulations requiring parking on alternate sides of the street
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019-10-02 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 18-P-1109 Appeals Court COMMONWEALTH v
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 570 B.R. 123
OPINION & ORDER Brian K. Tester, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Before the court is Co-Defendant Moto-rambar, Incorporated’s Summary Judgment Motion (hereinafter “Motorambar”) [Dkt. No. 66]; PlaintiffiDebtor Shylene Marie Cox Santiago’s Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment DKT 68 (hereinafter “Cox Santiago”) [Dkt. No. 80]; Motoram-bar’s Tendered Reply to Opposition to Summary Judgment Mot
District Court, D. Oregon · 2003-03-03 · Published · cited 4× · 247 F. Supp. 2d 1208; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3192; 2003 WL 728956
247 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2003) Karen SHARR; et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, being sued as Norman Mineta, Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation and Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), in his official capacity; et al., Defendants. Civil No. 02-1513-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. March 3, 2003.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-05-12 · Published · cited 3× · 136 F.4th 1284
USCA11 Case: 23-10690 Document: 74-1 Date Filed: 05/12/2025 Page: 1 of 20 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10690 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2025-05-23 · Published · cited 0×
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES Panel VIII JEANNETTE SANTIAGO LUCERNA Certiorari Recurrida procedente del Tribunal de v. Primera Instancia MAPFRE-PRAICO INSURANCE KLCE202500314 Sala de COMPANY, FULANO DE TA
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 3× · 918 F.3d 223
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. After a jury trial, Nelson Santiago-Colon, a pastor, was convicted of three counts of transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity. 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (a). On appeal, he challenges his within-guidelines sentence
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2017-05-05 · Published · cited 25× · 198 P.R. Dec. 35
La Jueza Presidenta Oronoz Rodríguez emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Nos corresponde determinar si, conforme con lo resuelto en Pueblo v. Esquilín Díaz, 146 DPR 808 (1998), procede anular una sentencia dictada por un tribunal apelativo porque el apelante era un fugitivo al presentarse la apelación. A su vez, debemos resolver si presentar en evi-dencia armas no imputadas en la acusación, entre otra prue